[CentOS] Can we use gstreamer bad, ugly and ffmpeg packages ( installed using binary rpms) without any legal problems
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgWed Oct 20 13:36:47 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] Can we use gstreamer bad, ugly and ffmpeg packages ( installed using binary rpms) without any legal problems
- Next message: [CentOS] undefined reference when linking against libresolv
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On 10/20/2010 02:33 PM, praveenya kumar wrote: > we use these packages ( bad, ugly and ffmpeg) without any legal or > licensing issues? If No, Please tell the legal way of using them. The only person who can answer that question definitively is your lawyer; Also, it depends on where you are, where you machine is, where your code is and how/ what you are doing with it. So, speak to your lawyer. (S)He's the person who will need to prep your legal case should it ever come to that. - KB
- Previous message: [CentOS] Can we use gstreamer bad, ugly and ffmpeg packages ( installed using binary rpms) without any legal problems
- Next message: [CentOS] undefined reference when linking against libresolv
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list