[CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

[Tru Huynh]

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> >
> >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back
> >>> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
> >>
> >> So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your
> >> idea of doing things faster?
> > who is everyone?
> 
> I might throw some time and equipment at it if I knew I wasn't 
> re-inventing square wheels (or even round ones for that matter).  And I 
> suspect that others smarter than I am would do the same and maybe even 
> improve the approach by coming up with ways to predict the build 
> environment needed to reproduce a given binary to reduce the 
> trial-and-error time.
Same answer for you than I made for Dag, volonteer to coordinate, build, 
write scripts, publish *your* work and you will be helping your fellows.
>  But I don't see this happening if the process 
> stays closed any more than I think there would be a useful Linux today - 
> or most of the packages comprising Red Hat's product - if development 
> had not been open and shared.
I only see wasted time talking, no actions. I will be happy to be proven wrong.

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110411/b4de355d/attachment.sig>