[CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

[Steve Clark]

On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
>    
>> I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and
>> omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did
>> according to reports.
>>      
> 	At some point do you think perhaps you can learn how to trim
> 	replies to only that which is germane to the reply and not
> 	include all the cascade text and attributions which proceeded it
> 	as a courtesy to others on this list?
>
> 	It seems that nearly every release there are SRPMs that fail to
> 	make it to Redhat's public ftp server.  It happens during
> 	releases and it happens for normal updates and is nothing new.
> 	It's simple human error, not a conspiracy to harm CentOS or any
> 	other rebuilding effort.  Can you please keep the conspiracy
> 	nonsense to yourself?
>
>
>
>
> 							John
I thought the big thing made about bottom posting is so you can see the 
whole thread. If you cut out
a bunch then you might as well top post.


-- 
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Sr. Software Engineer III
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110218/dccc10f7/attachment.html>