On Mon 27 Sep 2021, 16:35 Jeffrey Osier-Mixon, jefro@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all - I'd be grateful to get some other voices in the mix. If anyone has any concerns about Gitlab, please let us know now before any work is done. Thanks!
Absolutely let's get the conversation flowing, this is all git under the hood so moving things is possible if not with some effort involved. I'd like us to balance that with the need to make a decision and not suffer from analysis paralysis. The main thing for me is getting code open and available for contributions and usage!
Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | jefro@redhat.com Red Hat Office of the CTO | Sr. Principal Community Architect, Automotive
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:14 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:50:22PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
Hey everyone,
This came up on the call yesterday to open a discussion about where we should host our code and I'd like to open it up here for transparency on the path forward. We have a lot of options in this sphere and all are
Git
based.
Historically, CentOS SIGs had their code hosted at
That's wired up to the CentOS Account system so users can login
seamlessly.
Some SIGs have opted to host on Github as well and use their own Github profile (which is not connected to their CentOS account).
Currently, CentOS Stream is being built in the open at gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream where community contributors can
create a
Gitlab account and interact with CentOS Stream. Gitlab is not currently wired into the CentOS Account system and the team is working to get that integration on the gitlab.com/CentOS project (which is currently
dormant).
The suggestion put forward by Pierre-Yves Chibon, who is leading the
effort
within Red Hat on creating the services and infrastructure for the SIG,
is
to base ourselves on Gitlab. We can create a gitlab.com/redhat/automotive-sig project and mirror it at gitlab.com/centos/automotive-sig so we can show people where we will
work
once we've resolved the authentication question. The drawback is the
need
to use a gitlab.com account, which, in time, we can merge into the
CentOS
Account when the integration is completed. The key benefit of having us base our code on Gitlab is the closeness to Stream from a codebase perspective and the potential to use similar tools and approaches as
their
development workflow.
While no formal decision on where the overall CentOS SIGs will host
their
code in the future has been made, the presence of Stream on Gitlab is potentially future proofing us against a migration.
Does the community have a strong preference for where we should base our repos? I'm going to suggest we leave this topic percolate for a week to have some dialog on the best path forward and then create our presence
on
the source forge of choice.
A week has passed and there hasn't been any strong preference voiced. We have checked Smooge's feedback and it looks like gitlab can do migration with redirect from the old location to the new one both at the http and the git level [1] so moving to the centos namespace as soon as it is available should be transparent.
So I have asked for the project : https://gitlab.com/redhat/automotive/automotive-sig to be created and we will soon be able to push to it :)
Pierre
[1] https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/repository/index.html#what-happens-w...
CentOS-automotive-sig mailing list CentOS-automotive-sig@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-automotive-sig
CentOS-automotive-sig mailing list CentOS-automotive-sig@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-automotive-sig