automotive-sig December 2024

automotive-sig@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4 discussions

Request new git repos
by Alexander Larsson 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

Hi, I'd like to request two new git repos: https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/src/auto-boot-check and https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/rpms/auto-boot-check -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc alexl(a)redhat.com alexander.larsson(a)gmail.com

3 2

Request new git repos
by Alexander Larsson 17 Dec '24

17 Dec '24

1 0

Please create fusa-gcc-plugin repo
by Martin Perina 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hi, could you please create fusa-gcc-plugin repo under https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/src ? This repo should be used to upstream fusa-gcc-plugin source code. The package will become part of AutoSD as soon as packaging is finished. Also could you please give maintainer permissions to Mark Kemel and Pavel Odvody? Thanks a lot, Martin -- Martin Perina Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

3 3

Creating an Automotive SIG doc group
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 03 Dec '24

03 Dec '24

Good Morning Everyone! Until now the documentation of the SIGs have been a little bit maintained by everyone, as they saw fit and as they had time or interest in doing so. I've been contacted by a team at Red Hat who is used to working and maintaining documentation and who has offered to take the lead with our documentation. So we discussed created a dedicated Automotive SIG documentation team which would have its own group and would be in charge of the SIG's docs. In this spirit, I have asked yesterday the creation of the group: https://accounts.centos.org/group/gitlab-centos-sig-automotive-docs-maintai… Which is mapped in gitlab to: https://gitlab.com/groups/CentOS/automotive/groups/automotive-docs-maintain… and has been made maintainer of: https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/sig-docs/ I realize now that it would have been good of me to announce/offer this idea up for discussion before moving ahead with this, I apologies for this. I didn't remove access to the entire SIG, so at the moment except for a new group, nothing has changed. I do think though that it would make sense, down the line, to make the automotive-sig group be developer (rather than maintainer) for the sig-docs project and only have the automotive-docs-maintainers group be maintainer. That being said, I think we should do that only once the group who is looking at our documentation has started communicated on this list about their ideas and plans :) Thoughts and feedbacks most welcome! Thanks, Pierre

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

automotive-sig December 2024