automotive-sig October 2025

automotive-sig@lists.centos.org

2 participants
3 discussions

Repository request
by mengel＠redhat.com 29 Apr '26

29 Apr '26

Hi everyone, I would like to request a new repository to be created: https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/src/selcraft This repository will host a project for generating selinux policies for automotive based on a configuration. I intend to move the contents of https://gitlab.com/mengel1/custom-qm-policy as soon as the repo is created. Regards, Michael Engel

3 3

Custom kernel build fails: rsync: Argument list too long
by Sebastian Hetze 02 Mar '26

02 Mar '26

Hi *, when trying to build the centos-stream-9 main-automotive kernel for the x86_64 architecture as described in the automotive sig documentation <https://sigs.centos.org/automotive/building/building_an_os_image_that%20use…>, it fails. The failing command appears to be /usr/bin/make -s 'HOSTCFLAGS=-O2 -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64-v2 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection' 'HOSTLDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 ' -j12 ARCH=x86_64 V=1 'TARGETS=bpf cgroup mm livepatch net net/forwarding net/mptcp netfilter tc-testing memfd drivers/net/bonding iommu cachestat drivers/net' SKIP_TARGETS= FORCE_TARGETS=1 INSTALL_PATH=/home/she/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-automotive-5.14.0-570.518_at.el9iv.x86_64/usr/libexec/kselftests VMLINUX_H= DEFAULT_INSTALL_HDR_PATH=0 install with the error make[3]: Entering directory '/home/she/Workspace/centos-stream-9/redhat/rpm/BUILD/kernel-5.14.0-570.518_at.el9iv/linux-5.14.0-570.518_at.el9iv.x86_64/tools/testing/selftests/bpf' Auto-detecting system features: ... llvm: [ OFF ] make[3]: rsync: Argument list too long make[3]: *** [Makefile:768: test_progs-no_alu32-extras] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/she/Workspace/centos-stream-9/redhat/rpm/BUILD/kernel-5.14.0-570.518_at.el9iv/linux-5.14.0-570.518_at.el9iv.x86_64/tools/testing/selftests/bpf' make[2]: *** [Makefile:233: install] Error 2 This is the unmodified main-automotive branch of the current centos-stream-9 kernel on a current centos-stream-9 system. Setting ulimit -S -s unlimited for ARG_MAX 6291456 does not make any difference. It looks like the actual problem is not with the rsync command line. Any hint what is going wrong and how to proceed? Beste Grüße Sebastian Hetze -- Principal Software Engineer Red Hat GmbH. Niederlassung Berlin Leipziger Platz 16, 10117 Berlin Mobil: +49 173 8914205 E-Mail: she(a)redhat.com Registered seat: Werner von Siemens Ring 14, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Germany Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen/Munich, HRB 153243,Managing Directors: Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross

3 2

CI failure notifications?
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 26 Jan '26

26 Jan '26

Good Morning Everyone, In the sig-docs [1] repository we have a CI job that runs daily and builds, runs and checks a number of images [2]. When those builds/runs/checks fail there is usually a good reason that we should go and check. Currently I believe I'm the only one being notified about those failure. As part of https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/sig-docs/-/merge_requests/441 I'd like this list to be notified, but I don't want to do this without asking before. So what do you all think? Is anyone against this? If not, then I'll go ahead with the change and if it starts to be too annoying/noisy we can always revisit later :) Looking forward for your feedback :) Pierre

1 1

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

automotive-sig October 2025