Discuss May 2005

discuss@lists.centos.org

221 participants
344 discussions

Re: ReiserFS3 Support
by Lance Lucas 04 May '05

04 May '05

Along the lines of the recent discussion about ReiserFS support, I was wondering if it is compatible with SELinux? I know there are some file system support issues regarding it... Another random question: is there a way to get/use Disk Druid under a running installation? This would make adding new disks, RAIDs, LVM management, etc. a breeze compared to what it can be like sometimes currently. It's all there and very easy to use during the install, but I haven't found an easy way to add software raid-1 pairs w/LVM2 to a currently running installation. Regards...

1 0

Compiling Kernel Modules
by Maciej Zenczykowski 04 May '05

04 May '05

Hi, Here'a a question - is it possible to compile a single module (distributed in the kernel source tree) for the current CentOS kernel (2.6.9-5.0.5) without recompiling the entire kernel and all other modules. I basically need reiserfs3 (nb. why is it disabled? it's a module, you use it, it doesn't wreck anything...) and I don't really want to change the rest of the kernel, and I'd like to have the minimum amount of fuss on future kernel upgrades. Now I know external modules can be compiled without recompiling the kernel - question is how to do it for an internal kernel module. What I've tried: I've installed the kernel source code, copied over the kernel settings (the entire /usr/src/kernels/2.6.... dir) onto it. run make menuconfig and selected modular reiserfs. A diff of the new and old configs shows only reiser module (and suboptions for selinux) has been enabled. So no other changes have been made. Now a make fs/reiserfs/ almost works, but it borks on some sort of .tmp_versions/reiserfs.mod problem (file not present). The resultant reiserfs.o doesn't work as reiserfs.ko (not sure if it should, though).. I can't run make modules_install without first compiling all the other modules... Should I just grep through the .config file and replace all (except reiser) =m with =n's (and rerun make oldconfig to make sure it's still consistent)? And then run make modules modules_install? Any ideas? Basically all I want is reiserfs3 for the current CentOS4 kernel... Cheers, MaZe.

6 12

User Mode Linux and the CentOS 4.0 Kernel
by Bill Bydder 04 May '05

04 May '05

Does anybody know where I might find a stock standard ready rolled binary CentOS Kernel (2.6.9-5.0.5.EL) rpm package BUT with the skas mode uml (user mode linux) patch applied ? If not I will try and build one myself......gulp.... ;-) Is there any good howto's out their on how to do this? It all appears very different with CentOS 4.0 and the 2.6.9-5.0.5.EL.src.rpm. Cheers Bill

1 0

Re: [CentOS] rebuilding anaconda for centos 4.0
by David Thompson 03 May '05

03 May '05

Johnny Hughes wrote: > >David, I rebuild with the included anaconda every respin :) > >Here is the latest and greatest build script I used for making a 4.1Beta >set of ISOs. > >http://centos.hughesjr.com/testing/build.sh Ahhhh. I had some incorrect usage on genhdlist/pkgorder that was causing the problems. Referencing these and tweaking a couple things has resolved the problem. Thanks much! Dave

1 0

CentOS 4 - problem with remote X application
by Petr Klíma 03 May '05

03 May '05

Hello i have a problem on CentOS 4 with starting remote x application on remote CentOS 3 od Solaris 9 boxes. The problem is: When I run it from CentOS 3 it's OK form CentOS 4 I cannot find a bad word in logs ... My local machine stoping firewall [root@klima-pc ~]# service iptables stop [root@klima-pc ~]# iptables-save [root@klima-pc ~]# SELinux is OFF I am connecting by ssh with Xforwarding enabled to - Centos 3 box [09:32 root@tux:root]# gvim --sync The program 'gvim' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter)'. (Details: serial 287 error_code 5 request_code 20 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) [09:33 root@tux:root]# -Solaris 9 box root@sun bin# gvim --sync Gdk-ERROR **: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) serial 364 error_code 5 request_code 20 minor_code 0 Gdk-ERROR **: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) serial 365 error_code 10 request_code 102 minor_code 0 root@sun bin#

2 1

RE: Vacation forwarder - syntax of .forward file - FIXED
by Nigel Kendrick 03 May '05

03 May '05

Sorted!! Looks like I started to play around with my user account while still logged in as root, and .vacation.db in my home directory was owned by root:root - changing it to nkendrick:root has fixed the problem. Regards, Nigel

1 0

Vacation program
by Nigel Kendrick 03 May '05

03 May '05

Is anyone else running the 'vacation' mail forwarder on Centos 3? When I 'make install' I get the following error: strip: /usr/bin/vaclook: File format not recognized When I try and use vacation (with postfix), it 'goes through the motions' but inbound mail bounces with <nkendrick(a)munged.home.local>: Command died with status 1: "/usr/bin/vacation -a nkendrick(a)munged.com nkendrick" I have sent a mail to the postfix list too but I thought I'd see if anyone here has any ideas too. Thanks Nigel

1 0

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 Software Raid1 questions
by Lee Parmeter 02 May '05

02 May '05

--- Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic(a)pbl.ca> wrote: > Lee Parmeter wrote: > > I did not mark the parition type to FD so apparently > the > > kernel or mdadm just executes and looks in the > ndadm.conf > > file. > > > > When trying to start the raid manually, I found that > the > > raid would fail unless I passed the partion assignments > on > > the commandline to mdadm. However, when the DEVICE and > > ARRAY are defined in the mdadm.conf, the partion info > was > > not required, just the device name, "/dev/md0". So, I > think > > the raid failed to start at boot due to not enough > > information being available for it to startup, thus the > > mdadm.conf file being required. > > > > Anyway, that's what my experince told me! > > OK, but have you attempted to mark the partition as type > fd (linux raid > autodetect)? No. Since /dev/md0 is loading OK in fstab, I have not messed with it further. My guess is, if you did, the kernel would > bring it up as > soon as raid* device drivers are loaded. The information > in superblocks > at the end of each partition should be more than enough. I will be creating another raid1 in the next week or two and will try you suggestion then. > -- > Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic(a)pbl.ca> Pollard > Banknote Limited > Systems Administrator 1499 > Buffalo Place > Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276 Winnipeg, > MB R3T 1L7 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin http://www.linXos.com Linux Registered User #337161 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a Republic! God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

[ANNOUNCE] Areca SATA RAID drivers for CentOS 4.0
by Matt Dainty 02 May '05

02 May '05

Hi, To follow up my CentOS 4.0/Areca SATA RAID driver disk I created a month or two ago, I have now created kernel-module-arcmsr RPMs containing just the kernel module to track the kernel updates. This means: a) No need to patch, rebuild and maintain customised kernels for Areca support b) Keep everything maintained with RPM I've taken the latest 1.20.00.07 kernel driver source as found in the 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel, and built it for all variations of the i586/i686/x86_64 2.6.9-5.0.5.EL CentOS 4.0 kernels. I've also updated the driver disk so it now has the same kernel driver, but built for all of the i586/i686/x86_64 2.6.9-5.0.3.EL kernels used on the installer. There is also a nosrc RPM for the various utilities Areca offer, but you'll have to build that one yourself as I don't know what license they're released under. As before, you can get them from here: http://www.bodgit-n-scarper.com/code.html#centos I only have an x86_64 machine with an Areca card, so if anyone is using these packages on an i586 or i686 machine, please drop me a note so I at least know they work. Thanks Matt

1 0

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 Software Raid1 questions
by Lee Parmeter 02 May '05

02 May '05

--- Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 12:20, Lee Parmeter wrote: > > > I did not find any information on the web concerning > the > > requirement of the mdadm.conf file and the relationship > to > > the auto start of the raid. I had to work a bit in the > dark > > to get it to work as I thought it should. > > I think if you set the partition type to FD with fdisk, > the > system is supposed to figure everything out automatically > at boot time. I have, however, had some trouble when > moving > pairs of disks built on one machine to a different one > and > would generally prefer to control it with a definition in > a > file if possible instead of having the system guess. If > you > have both, I'm not sure which wins. If you find > documentation > on the detection order or how to move devices, please > post > a link. I did not mark the parition type to FD so apparently the kernel or mdadm just executes and looks in the ndadm.conf file. When trying to start the raid manually, I found that the raid would fail unless I passed the partion assignments on the commandline to mdadm. However, when the DEVICE and ARRAY are defined in the mdadm.conf, the partion info was not required, just the device name, "/dev/md0". So, I think the raid failed to start at boot due to not enough information being available for it to startup, thus the mdadm.conf file being required. Anyway, that's what my experince told me! > -- > Les Mikesell > les(a)futuresource.com > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin http://www.linXos.com Linux Registered User #337161 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a Republic! God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss May 2005