Discuss December 2006

discuss@lists.centos.org

209 participants
192 discussions

RE: [CentOS] courier authlib,courier-map,maildrop
by Bowie Bailey 02 Dec '06

02 Dec '06

Matt Hyclak wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:27:40PM +0800, dennis enlightened us: > > im using my box for mail server (CENTOS 4.4 ) is there any RPM > > packages for > > courier authlib,courier-map,maildrop for CENTOS 4.4 ,any link how > > to get it, any suggestion, > > > > Download the tarballs and run rpmbuild -ta on them, RPMs will be > generated for you. You can get the tarball from here: http://www.courier-mta.org/?download.php Instructions on building the rpms as non-root are here: http://www.courier-mta.org/FAQ.html#rpm -- Bowie

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Initiator for iscsi?
by Brian 02 Dec '06

02 Dec '06

Sorry for the top post, but yahoo is dumb. Maybe its just me though... Yes, we are running with iSCSI filesystems mounted. CentOS 4.4 iscsi-initiator-utils-4.0.3.0-4 GFS Performance using iozone (I don't have the test run data available, but it was acceptable given the redundancy and concurrent write operations GFS gives us) testing was good on the test systems, but we haven't done testing on the final production systems yet. I'm waiting to resolve mounting the third iSCSI partition properly on 2/4 of the cluster nodes before running an all-out test. Brian ----- Original Message ---- From: Peter Eisch <peter(a)boku.net> To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2006 12:18:12 AM Subject: [CentOS] Initiator for iscsi? Anyone running centos with an iscsi filesystem mounted? If so: What version of centos? Which iscsi package? What filesystem are you using on the mount? Does it perform like you'd expect? Thanks, peter _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Assuming write caching from CentOS 4.4 to iSCSI device
by Brian 02 Dec '06

02 Dec '06

Hi list, CentOS 4.4 connecting to Promise M500i iSCSI disk array. 2/4 servers connect fine with iscsi-initiator-utils-4.0.3.0-4. The other 2 servers have this in dmesg: SCSI device sdb: 1 512-byte hdwr sectors (0 MB) sdb: asking for cache data failed sdb: assuming drive cache: write through SCSI device sdb: 1 512-byte hdwr sectors (0 MB) sdb: asking for cache data failed sdb: assuming drive cache: write through sdb:<6>Device sdb not ready. end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 0 Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 0 Device sdb not ready. end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 0 Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 0 Device sdb not ready. end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 0 Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 0 Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 The drive does not allow connections after this failed attempt at guessing the write cache type. Is there a way to hard-code the write cache setting on the server? Anyone experience this with other hardware/iscsi/promise devices? Brian __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

win32:tenga on samba share
by David Milholen 02 Dec '06

02 Dec '06

I have a box set up for home use, but it was used as a massive file share for a bunch of friends. I only allowed 3 accounts to this share with password. I believe over time someone loaded a file that had the win32:Tenga virus on it. I usually clean the files and download what I need but I leave the files on the Share. I have lots of directories and files on this. I have been using Trend Micro from a remote windows box to clean them periodically but for some reason it rears it ugly head every once and a while. What can I do to permanently get rid of this annoying virus?? Thanks -- Wireless Etc David Milholen Lead Coordinator Phone:(501)318-1300 Email:dmilholen@wletc.com Web:www.wletc.com

2 1

Large disk support
by Kevan Benson 02 Dec '06

02 Dec '06

I have a 3.5 TB RAID 5 Array through a 3ware 9590SE 8 port card, and am running into what seems like quite a lot of problems trying to get the system installed correctly. The system is a running dual Opterons with 2 GB of RAM, and I'm attempting to install through the x86_64 ServerCD. First, grub refuses to install on the disk, as it's too large. I can get around this though by booting Fedora Core 6 in rescue mode and running grub, as it can deal with the disk size correctly. This might only be working when I attempt installs that don't utilize as much of the array as possible though (100 MB /boot, 2GB swap, 10Gb /, the rest left unallocated). Secondly, there seems to be a problem using msdos disk labels with large partitions, and I can't seem to find any solutions to this in the manuals or on the net. GPT labels are offered as a solution to this but only for Itanium systems. Am I missing some obvious solution to this? Are there some best practices for dealing with large disks anyone can share that may save me problems now or later? I'm open to suggestions, as all I've encountered so far are problems. -- - Kevan Benson - A-1 Networks

5 6

microcode_ctl
by Denis Machard 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

i'm running on vmware system and HP proliant DL360 G5 servers on wmware, on boot i have the following message: ----------------------------- Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" [OK] ----------------------------- and on a HP proliant DL360 G5 server , on boot i have too the following message: ----------------------------- Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" etc/rc3.d/S00microcode_ctl: microcode device /dev/cpu/microcode doesn't exist? [OK] ----------------------------- Why this message, warning ? Denis MACHARD <mailto:d@enst-bretagne.fr>

4 3

RE: [CentOS] Re: I've been hacked -- what should I do next?
by Mark Schoonover 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Scott Silva wrote: > Aleksandar Milivojevic spake the following on 12/1/2006 12:43 PM: >> Quoting Alfred von Campe <alfred(a)110.net>: >> >>> FWIW, the IP addresses are 172.178.63.167 (acb23fa7.ipt.aol.com) and >>> 61.43.153.30. There is no reverse entry for the latter, so I don't >>> know who to contact. I'll fire off an email to AOL (not that I >>> think anything will happen). >> >> You can use a whois database to find the info (for example, there's >> web interface on www.ripe.net). Info for 61.43.153.30 indicates >> that this IP address is alocated to an provider in South Korea. >> Contact addresses included: >> >> inetnum: 61.32.0.0 - 61.43.255.255 >> netname: BORANET-1 >> descr: DACOM Corp. >> descr: Facility-based Telecommunication Service Provider >> descr: providing Internet leased-ine, on-line service, BLL >> etc. country: KR admin-c: DB50-AP >> tech-c: DB50-AP >> status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE "status:" definitions >> mnt-by: APNIC-HM >> mnt-lower: MNT-KRNIC-AP >> changed: hostmaster(a)apnic.net >> 20000918 >> source: APNIC >> >> role: DACOM BORANET >> address: DACOM Bldg., 706-1, Yoeksam-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul >> country: KR phone: +82-2-2089-7755 >> fax-no: +82-2-2089-0706 >> e-mail: ipadm(a)nic.bora.net >> e-mail: abuse(a)bora.net >> e-mail: security(a)bora.net >> admin-c: EC115-AP >> tech-c: SIJ1-AP >> nic-hdl: DB50-AP >> remarks: IP address administrator group of NIC team, DACOM >> Corp. remarks: If related with spam, send mail to >> abuse(a)bora.net >> remarks: If related with security, send mail to >> security(a)bora.net remarks: Only for whois information >> correction, send mail to ipadm(a)nic.bora.net mnt-by: >> MNT-KRNIC-AP >> changed: jeonsi(a)bora.net 20041105 >> source: APNIC > Hacked from Korea! There is a surprise!! ;-D We're all assuming that the IP address wasn't spoofed... Mark

1 0

courier authlib,courier-map,maildrop
by dennis 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

hi to all, im using my box for mail server (CENTOS 4.4 ) is there any RPM packages for courier authlib,courier-map,maildrop for CENTOS 4.4 ,any link how to get it, any suggestion, thanks to all in advanced,any suggestion will appreciate. TIA, dennis

2 1

SAS Controllers
by Mark Snyder 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Hi All, first time post so please excuse any blunders We are specifying two servers using supermicro X7DBE+ MB and want to add on a SAS controller for Raid 10. We want to use the CentOS 4.4 X86_64 distro. We are currently considering an Intel CC SRCSAS144E SAS Raid Controller for the servers using 4 Fujitsu 147 GB SAS HDD, and a Adaptec SASC RAID 4805 8-port for the server using 6 Fujitsu 147 GB SAS HDD. Any feedback on this distro, the supermicro X7DBE+, or SAS controllers would be appreciated. Thanks Mark Snyder JMK Computerized TDIS

5 4

microcode_ctl
by Denis Machard 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

On vmware i have i386 kernel and with HP server a x86_64 kernel -----Original Message----- From: Wojtek.Pilorz [mailto:wpilorz@bdk.pl] Sent: mercredi 29 novembre 2006 12:33 To: Denis Machard Cc: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] microcode_ctl On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Denis Machard wrote: > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:42:20 +0100 > From: Denis Machard <dmachard(a)fr.netcentrex.net> > Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> > To: 'CentOS mailing list' <centos(a)centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS] microcode_ctl > > i'm running on vmware system and HP proliant DL360 G5 servers > > > on wmware, on boot i have the following message: > > ----------------------------- > Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" > [OK] > ----------------------------- > > and on a HP proliant DL360 G5 server , on boot i have too the > following > message: > > ----------------------------- > Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" > etc/rc3.d/S00microcode_ctl: microcode device /dev/cpu/microcode > doesn't exist? > [OK] > ----------------------------- > Do you have i686 kernel running (rather than i586) ? I had such message on Fedora Core 6 which installed i586 kernel on my PIII CPU. Wojtek

3 2

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss December 2006