Discuss May 2008

discuss@lists.centos.org

268 participants
281 discussions

problem of building stardict
by cjzjm100 18 May '08

18 May '08

Hi guys! today i tried to install the latest stardict. When i configure it.The result is : [cjzjm100@localhost stardict-3.0.1]$ ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --mandir=/usr/share/man checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2 checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking for intltool >= 0.22... 0.36.2 found checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for XML::Parser... ok checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E checking for g77... no checking for xlf... no checking for f77... no checking for frt... no checking for pgf77... no checking for cf77... no checking for fort77... no checking for fl32... no checking for af77... no checking for xlf90... no checking for f90... no checking for pgf90... no checking for pghpf... no checking for epcf90... no checking for gfortran... gfortran checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... yes checking whether gfortran accepts -g... yes checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 98304 checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok checking for objdir... .libs checking for ar... ar checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for strip... strip checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no configure: creating libtool appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool checking for ld used by g++... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking for g++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if g++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if g++ static flag -static works... yes checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no checking for gfortran option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if gfortran PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if gfortran static flag -static works... yes checking if gfortran supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the gfortran linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking for library containing strerror... none required checking for gcc... (cached) gcc checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3 checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... (cached) yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... (cached) yes checking dependency style of g++... (cached) gcc3 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking for getpagesize... yes checking for working mmap... yes checking locale.h usability... yes checking locale.h presence... yes checking for locale.h... yes checking for LC_MESSAGES... yes checking libintl.h usability... yes checking libintl.h presence... yes checking for libintl.h... yes checking for ngettext in libc... yes checking for dgettext in libc... yes checking for bind_textdomain_codeset... yes checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for dcgettext... yes checking if msgfmt accepts -c... yes checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for ENCHANT... yes checking for GUCHARMAP... no configure: error: Gucharmap library not found or too old. Use --disable-gucharmap to build without gucharmap plugin. I dont want to disable the gucharmap. I know i should install the newer gucharmap package.what other packages i should install?By the way ,can you tell me the function of these packages? should i pay attention to the result like this: checking for g77... no? If i install the software from source code,how can i uninstall it?

3 2

howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1
by Jerry Geis 18 May '08

18 May '08

Is there a way to use kvm-amd on centos 5.1? I dont want to mess with XEN. I want the hardware virtualization that is on my AMD chip. I played with putting 2.6.24 and centos 5.1 on my AMD laptop, got kvm-amd and that works. However I want to put this on my desktop that is running 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5. Is there a way or do I just wave to use 2.6.24 or 25. Thanks, Jerry

4 5

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability
by Les Bell 18 May '08

18 May '08

Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos(a)br-online.de> wrote: >> I don't think the OpenSSH devels really do care about that - there is no discussion whatsoever on the secureshell list or on the devel list. No idea about our upstream, but I don't think so either. << Correct: all that needs to be said was said years ago, by Dr. Robert E. Coveyou, of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (now NIST): "The generation of random numbers is to important to be left to chance". Best, --- Les Bell, RHCE, CISSP [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 9451 1144 FreeWorldDialup: 800909

3 2

CentOS-DS
by Jason Ross 18 May '08

18 May '08

Hey all, I am looking at deploying a directory server in a small network. Currently looking at Fedora-ds and I noticed that CentOS is currently working on one. Does anyone know if the CentOS-DS is working well at this point? I noticed a how to is up on the wiki and was wondering if maybe it was preferable to Fedora-ds at this point. Thanks, Jason Ross

6 8

Fedora IRC
by James Bunnell 18 May '08

18 May '08

There is a IRC channel in the Freenode network for #fedora-newmexico users, if interested.

1 0

OOM condition with file-4.17-9.0.1.el5
by John 18 May '08

18 May '08

Hello all, We just encountered several serious Out of Memory Problems caused by the file 4.17-9.0.1.EL5 utility on our mail Gateway. CentOS 5.1 kept it self alive by killing it parent process Amavisd-new. Manually restarting Amavisd-new and flushing the mail queue caused same problem. Disabling file for the moment, caused Amavisd-new to fail, and also defer all mail. My quick and dirty solution was the download the Fedora Core 9's file.4.23-5.src.rpm. and rebuild it on CentOS 5 After upgrading file, restarting Amavisd-new and flushing the Postfix queue, all mail was delivered without problems. Because our mail system went down, it didn't have the time to trace the message causing the problem. But I want to share here that the Redhat / CentOS EL5 file utility has problems and provide a quick workaround for the problem. Regards, John The Netherlands

6 8

Centos Freezing
by Robert Spangler 17 May '08

17 May '08

Hello, For some reason at different times Centos will freeze and not allow me to do anything. This doesn't happen while I'm working on the system but after I have locked my session and then return. It could goes days without a lockup and then the next time I try to log in it'll be frozen. I would like to know if anyone else has seen this or knows of a fix or where I could start to look to find out if there is a process or something causing this. I normally have the same programs running so I don't think it could be caused by me starting and then leaving something new running. Thanks for your help. -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org

5 8

ext3 errors
by Les Mikesell 17 May '08

17 May '08

I recently set up a new system to run backuppc on centOS 5 with the archive stored on a raid1 of 750 gig SATA drives created with 3 members with one specified as "missing". Once a week I add the 3rd partition, let it sync, then remove it. I've had a similar system working for a long time using a firewire drive as the 3rd member, so I don't think the raid setup is the cause of the problem. I may have had problems with the drive power connectors initially but I think that is fixed now and I can't see any hardware errors being logged (the system/log files are on different drives). About once a week, I get an error like this, and the partition switches to read-only. --- Feb 24 04:48:20 linbackup1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md3): htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory #869973: directory entry across bloc ks - offset=0, inode=3915132787, rec_len=42464, name_len=11 Feb 24 04:48:20 linbackup1 kernel: Aborting journal on device md3. Feb 24 04:48:20 linbackup1 kernel: ext3_abort called. Feb 24 04:48:20 linbackup1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md3): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal Feb 24 04:48:20 linbackup1 kernel: Remounting filesystem read-only Feb 24 04:48:33 linbackup1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md3): htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory #4212181: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offse t=0, inode=4054525677, rec_len=1183, name_len=121 ---- 'fsck -y' seems to fix it up, but it keeps happening. Is this likely to be leftover cruft from the hardware issues or are there problems in ext3/raid1/sata drivers? The way backuppc stores data with millions of hardlinks in the archive it isn't really practical to copy it off, reformat, and start over. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

4 10

xen kernel showing only one processor on SMP machine
by gen2 17 May '08

17 May '08

Hi there, I'm running an ibm xseries 345/dual Xeon 2.66GHz, 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5xen #1 SMP, and cat /proc/cpuinfo shows me only one processor. Apparently something strange happening with ACPI. What am I doing wrong? Thank you! Selected bits from dmesg: ------------------------- Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information SMP alternatives: switching to UP code ACPI: Core revision 20060707 CPU 1 irqstacks, hard=c0728000 soft=c0708000 CPU 2 irqstacks, hard=c0729000 soft=c0709000 CPU 3 irqstacks, hard=c072a000 soft=c070a000 ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code Initializing CPU#1 Initializing CPU#2 Brought up 4 CPUs ACPI Exception (acpi_processor-0681): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20060707] ACPI: Getting cpuindex for acpiid 0x3 ACPI Exception (acpi_processor-0681): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20060707] ACPI: Getting cpuindex for acpiid 0x1

1 0

RE: [CentOS] clustered mail server?
by Rajeev R. Veedu 17 May '08

17 May '08

-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Chan Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:02 PM To: centos(a)centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server? > Thank you for your input. I can't justify exchange (and don't want MS) > for 10 users. I do want IMAP though, and the calendar & address book > would be nice. This IMO has nothing todo with CentOS though, but at the > same time it shouldn't be limited to which Linux distro I'm using. As > you have said I may need to look at file system clustering instead, but > have never attempted it, so I don't know where to begin even. I know a > lot of MTA's can support a central user DB, but that won't sync the > emails. And this won't be a commercial installation either, it's for a > for a project in a rural community about 700km's from me, so it's more a > matter of if 1 server dies / crashes / packes up, and I can only get to > it 5 days later, the mail server still works :) > > If you are looking exchange like functionality use POSTPATH. It comes with almost all features in exchange except the webmail. We are using it for the last 5 months, and look good so far. It can do load balance and clustering. You can download a 12 user version form www.postpath.com Thanks Rajeev _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
29
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss May 2008