Hi CentOS Mailinglist,
we are using amavisd-new (with all dependencies) from Fedora/Redhat EPEL repo. Some packages from EPEL repo are very old. (amavisd-new, clamav, spamassassin)
What's the best way to remove all amavisd-new packages (and it's dependencies) from EPEL repo and reinstall it from rpmforge repo?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Morten
Greetings all,
I would like to set the use of bandwidth in my network per user or ip
address, is it possible using my linux box running Centos 5.1?
regards,
Damas
--
"If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door".
Says,
Makweba Sir
Hello all,
>From time to time (more often lately) all xen guests crash with all
process to 9999% CPU load.
All VM running with Fedora 8 OS (PV VM).
On host (dual socket Xeon Nocona R0 3GHz) run CentOS x86_64 with
hypervisor Xen 3.4.0
Have some similar experiences? Any ideas?
I just noticed that since the last updates, Firefox no longer does the
automatic spelling checking thing in text boxes.
I'm sure that it used to work and I'm not sure exactly when it stopped.
I just tried it on two different up-to-date Centos 5 machines with the
same results.
"Check my spelling as I type" is set.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
Hi all,
We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape
and now trying to disk but it's a complete nightmare as regards tape
management. The backup to file storage went ok for ages and now is stuck
'waiting for max storage jobs' which is odd as that's set to 20 and it's
the only backup running. That's totally typical of bacula.
Can anyone suggest a simple backup package for us? Essentially a single
server, full backup to tape every day. We don't need tape management as
we're fully capable of reading the written label on the tape ourselves.
Hi all,
I'm just curios and would like some input from the community on this
one. We're busy budgeting for a couple of new servers and I thought it
would be good to try out the Core i7 CPU's, but see the majority of
them don't offer VT-d, but just VT-x. Looking at the LGA1366 range,
only the "Intel lga1366 i7 980XE" (from the list of what our suppliers
stock) have VT-d, and it costs 4x more than "Intel lga1366 i7 930" or
2x more than "Intel lga1366 i7 960". From a budget perspecitve I could
purchase 4 more CPU's, which could translate to 40x - 80x more VM's
being hosted for the same capital outlay. Experience has shown that we
under-utilize CPU's by a great margin and memory / HDD IO is our
biggest bottleneck on any server.
So, if VT-d really necessary?
We mainly host XEN virtual machine for the hosting industry, i.e. we
don't need / use graphics rendering inside VM's, or need DAS on the
VM's, etc.
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
hi all,
I wish to just have secure browsing for my application.
no credit cards or anything like that just secure browser usage is the goal.
I can self sign a certificate (I already have) on my servers but for
"anyone" accessing the server
you see this "nasty" message about "untrusted sight " and all that.
This will all be intranet type usage for the server.
What is the best method to not see that "untrusted sight" and have the
certificate load without
and exception?
jerry
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce(a)centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request(a)centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 3 i386 samba - security and
bug fix update (Tru Huynh)
2. CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 samba - security and
bug fix update (Tru Huynh)
3. CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 4 i386 samba - security and
bug fix update (Tru Huynh)
4. CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 samba - security and
bug fix update (Tru Huynh)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:23:12 +0200
From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 3 i386 samba
- security and bug fix update
To: centos-announce(a)centos.org
Message-ID: <20100915132312.GA2862(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0697
samba security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0697.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.18.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.18.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.18.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-swat-3.0.9-1.3E.18.i386.rpm
source:
updates/SRPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.18.src.rpm
You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command:
yum update samba
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
currently reading the RHEL deployment guide and i have a short
question about ACLs that i can test on my centos 5.5 box.
here:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deploymen…
the manual clearly claims that, in order to use ACLs on a filesystem,
that filesystem must be mounted with the "acl" mount option, and even
shows a sample /etc/fstab entry that represents that.
however, i just verified that i can use setfacl to give my non-root
account read access to /etc/shadow so, clearly(?), the root filesystem
supports ACLs, but the mount entry for that filesystem in /etc/fstab
reads only "defaults" and, as i read it in the man page for "mount",
the "defaults" option is not listed as including the "acl" option.
can someone clarify this? is there a command that shows whether a
filesystem is currently acl-enabled? and is the mount man page
simply incomplete in that respect? thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================