Discuss March 2011

discuss@lists.centos.org

286 participants
250 discussions

OT: grep regex pointer appreciated
by Patrick Lists 07 Mar '11

07 Mar '11

Hi, My grep regex foo is not very good and googling is getting me nowhere so hopefully someone is kind enough to give me some pointers. Goal: grep (non .dbg) filenames and versions from a ftp dir listing and a raw html file: $ wget --no-remove-listing -O ftp-index.txt ftp://127.0.0.1/test/ $ wget --no-remove-listing -O index.html http://127.0.0.1/test/ The relevant parts of the files above (first one is ftp listing, second part is the html file, both copied to test_regex.txt) are: 2011 … [View More]

4 4

IPERF Server
by Matt 07 Mar '11

07 Mar '11

When starting IPERF with "iperf -s" or "iperf -sD" it seems to stop after client runs its first test. I would like to leave it running for a few hours to give someone a chance to run a few tests. Is there a way to leave it active on the server and kill it manually later?

2 1

Re: [CentOS] IP6 Anyone?
by sheraznaz＠yahoo.com 07 Mar '11

07 Mar '11

>> Always learning wrote: >> I always thought, mistakenly, IP6 was 6 segments, because it was IP6. IP4 had 4 segments. However IP6 is >actually IP version 6 and it has 8 segments. I don't think I ever heard IP6, but always IPv6. Counting segments might not be as meaningful. IPv6 has twice (8) segments compared to IPv4 however each segment is 2 octets making IPv6 address space 4 times (128 bits) compared to IPv4 (32 bits). Thanks Sheraz Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

9 15

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Marvell SAS/SATA drivers
by Chuck Munro 07 Mar '11

07 Mar '11

On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote: > >> >Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver >> >in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4 >> >Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards. > Are those the Mac/Windows Sonnet cards that go for less than $200? > > What kind of performance you seeing? Are you doing software raid on them? Yes, those are the cards which target Windows and OS-X, but they work fine on … [View More]

3 3

kernel NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
by sync 07 Mar '11

07 Mar '11

Hi , all : Sometimes my server network connection on Linux goes down with short message in syslog saying: "[localhost kernel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out" (or similar). By the way , I installed the CentOS 5.4 x86_64 bit and the kernel version was 2.6.18-164. Has anyone experienced this problem or is it the bug of the kernel ? I restart the network and that problem have resolved just now.

5 5

Gnu Screen - terminal issues
by Sean Carolan 07 Mar '11

07 Mar '11

I really like gnu screen and use it everyday but there's one thing that is a bit inconvenient, and that's the odd line wrapping and terminal size issues that seem to pop up. The problem crops up when I type or paste a really long command, and then go back and try to edit it; the text starts to wrap over itself and you have no idea what you are editing. Any fixes for this?

9 33

Updating hardware clock from cron
by Kenneth Porter 06 Mar '11

06 Mar '11

Is there a package to do this? Normally the hardware clock is set during shutdown if one is running ntpd. But if a long-running server shuts down unexpectedly, this isn't done, and the hardware clock might be off by a lot when it comes back up. So setting it periodically from a cron job could be useful. What do others do? Adding a one liner to /etc/cron.daily that invokes /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpd would do it but it seems heavyweight to restart ntpd. Alas, the script doesn't export just the sync_hwclock function.

5 5

Problem burning dvd's
by Jimmy Bradley 06 Mar '11

06 Mar '11

I have a question on burning dvd iso's, using k3b. I have a sony dvd rw, and I've burned cd's with now problem, including iso's. The problem I'm having is, when I burn a dvd iso, k3b says it's a success, but then when I re-insert the disk, the drive tries to read the disk, but the read/write light just stays on, and the drive can't access the disk. Am I leaving a step out, or something? I burn cd iso's all the time. Thanks Jim

1 0

[Fwd: Re: Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?]
by James B. Byrne 05 Mar '11

05 Mar '11

On Fri, March 4, 2011 14:12, aurfalien(a)gmail.com wrote: > On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > >> --On Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:11 AM -0500 Digimer >> <linux(a)alteeve.com >> > >> wrote: >> >>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in >>> CentOS 6 when it is released? >> >> A new Ruby > > +1 I solved this problem on my 5.5 servers in the following manner: login: … [View More]

1 0

Will CentOS become obsolete now because of the changes Red Hat is implementing?
by Rudi Ahlers 05 Mar '11

05 Mar '11

This post appeared on another forum: Will CentOS become obsolete now because of the changes Red Hat is implementing? Red Hat has changed the way it distributes Enterprise Linux kernel code in an effort to prevent Oracle and Novell from stealing its customers, making it more difficult for these competitors to understand which patches have been applied where. Some have speculated that the change is designed to make it harder for Oracle as well as the open source CentOS project to build their … [View More]own Linux distributions. But Stevens says this is not the case. He says the change is meant to hamper Oracle and Novell's ability to offer support to customers who are already running Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). "We made the change, quite honestly, because we are absolutely making a set of steps that make it more difficult for competitors that wish to provide support services on top of Red Hat Enterprise Linux," Red Hat chief technology officer Brian Stevens tells The Register, before naming those competitors. "Today, there are two competitors that I'm aware of that go to our customers directly, offering to support RHEL directly for them...Oracle and Novell." In essence, Red Hat is trying to hide information from these competitors that is essential to providing support for RHEL specifically. "What we're trying to impede is competitors that come to customers who are already running RHEL under subscription from Red Hat and saying 'Don't pay Red Hat anymore, pay us, and don't make any changes to your systems'," Stevens says. He insists that the change does not violate either the letter or the spirit of RHEL's GPL open source license. "We were very careful that what we've done does not impede what our customers need to accomplish or what the community needs to accomplish." And he says that the change would not really hamper the development of other Linux distros, including CentOS. "We haven't at all restricted CentOS's ability to grab source code and recompile it and clean-out trademarks and package it. It's just some of the knowledge of the insides that we're hiding," he explains. One longtime CentOS developer agrees. "I'll not lose sleep on the matter," CentOS co-founder Russ Herold tells The Reg. In November, with the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, the company released its kernel package with all patches pre-applied. "In the past, we distributed the kernel as a base file and then a set of add-on patches that accompany it. Then when you did a build, the build process automatically applied all those patches to the kernel file," Stevens says. "Now, we integrate those patch files directly into that kernel. We do the first part of the build process prior to distribution." This was recently noticed by kernel-community member and LWN editor Jonathan Corbet, who took issue with the change, calling Red Hat's package "obfuscated" kernel source code. "Distribution in this form should satisfy the GPL, but it makes life hard for anybody else wanting to see what has been done with this kernel," Corbet wrote. "Hopefully it is simply a mistake which will be corrected soon." Others speculated that the move would undermine not only Oracle's Unbreakable Linux, but also CentOS. Both are based on RHEL. CentOS is meant to be a RHEL clone. Whereas the compiled bits of Red Hat Enterprise Linux are only available under a Red Hat paid subscription, CentOS is completely free. "The changes will make work harder for distributions such as CentOS, the community-built Linux distribution ... based on Red Hat's sources," H Online said. "CentOS is built from the RHEL source by a limited number of volunteers and Red Hat's change in policy will mean more work for them unless more volunteers or other companies step in and provide them with assistance." We heard similar noises from an experienced Linux kernel developer. He said that Red Hat's change was like shuffling all the cards in an old fashioned Dewey Decimal library file system – the card you want is still there, but finding it is no easy task – and that this would cause problems for CentOS, which is an economic threat to Red Hat. But CentOS founder Russ Herold insists the change is not a big issue. "Private local trial builds of the released RHEL 6 sources by me and others have proceeded with no major problems. I just do not see that the changes as some earth-shattering change. I just think [the patches will be] incrementally more difficult to figure out," he says. "Nothing in Red Hat's new approach prevents a person from running a local version-control system, containing the pristine kernel at point A, and the Red Hat variant which we might call point B. Then one runs a 'diff' in that version-control system between A and B, and starts reading the diffs to see what is happening. Over time, both the pristine kernel, and the patched Red Hat versions will vary, and one will get a sense for which 'diff' parts matter, and which are cosmetic cleanups." Other distros will not be affected, Red Hat's Stevens says, because the company distributes its kernel changes upstream as well. "The work that we've done should not impede companies from building their own versions of Linux and supporting those for their customers," he says. "All the code we deliver through RHEL is out there. In most cases, the changes that go into RHEL. We already distribute into the upstream kernel. We have an upstream-first policy, where we're developing openly and then later integrating into our tree and then delivering it. So it shouldn't at all impede the community or anybody that's in the business of competing on that." Red Hat, he reiterates, is trying to keep RHEL-specific knowledge away from Oracle and Novell. With past RHEL kernel-code distributions, the patches mapped to articles in Red Hat's knowledge base. "It makes competitors do heavy lifting," he says. "If you want to support RHEL, remove the trademarks, and do some heavy lifting. If nothing else, it causes competitors to have to invest." This won't hamper CentOS, he says, because CentOS isn't in the support business. "The code is still available. It's just more difficult to support the distro as a commercial entity. CentOS is not in the support business." Oracle and Novell are in the support business. And whatever collateral damage was caused by Red Hat's change in policy, one thing is for sure. On some level, it will indeed be more difficult for Oracle and Novell to pilfer the company's customers. Full story here : http://www.channelregister.co.uk/201...ode_packaging/ Can any of the CentOS team please comment on this? P.S. I don't want to put extra pressure on you guys seeing as the recent conversations about Centos 5.6 & CentOS 6 have done enough damage already, but it would be interesting to know what the future of CentOS is like with RedHat's change -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 [View Less]

9 9

← Newer
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss March 2011