Discuss March 2011

discuss@lists.centos.org

286 participants
250 discussions

log monitoring and reporting software
by Janez Kosmrlj 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Hi folks, In the company where i work, we are implementing a security standard. A part of this is a log monitoring and reporting software. There are a few requirements, that the software must fulfil: - It must be capable of collecting logs from different devices (Linux machines, network equipment, ...). - it must be capable of sending alarms on security events - it has to generate daily (weekly, monthly) reports - it's a plus if it is easy configurable - it has to have a good support or at least a good community if it is an opensource product So what are you using or at least some recommendations would be nice. An opensource product would be nice, but it's not required. I know i could google it, but it's difficult to decide for a product just from online and marketing presentations. It would be nice to get some real world experience. Thanx

9 11

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6
by Always Learning 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:28 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > One can find the f word in this forum from last week --- perhaps you > can search it out and help restore some civility, being of a more > civilized society than some others folks, including yours truly :( Dear Larry, I have work to do. Lots of it. Yours sincerely, Paul. England, EU.

8 9

CentOS 4.9
by Matt 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

What are the significant changes from CentOS 4.8 to 4.9 on 32 bit? Anybody take the plunge already on a production box?

4 3

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 73, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 release of CentOS-4.9 (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2011:0318 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 libtiff - security update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2011:0318 Important CentOS 4 i386 libtiff - security update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2011:0307 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 mailman - security update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2011:0307 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 mailman - security update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2011:0305 Important CentOS 4 i386 samba - security update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2011:0305 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 samba - security update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CESA-2011:0313 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey - security update (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2011:0313 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey - security update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CESA-2011:0312 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird - security update (Johnny Hughes) 11. CESA-2011:0312 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 thunderbird - security update (Johnny Hughes) 12. CESA-2011:0310 Critical CentOS 4 i386 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 13. CESA-2011:0310 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 14. CentOS 3.9 is now gone (Tru Huynh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:37:36 -0600 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 release of CentOS-4.9 To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4D6EB8A0.7030508(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS 4.9 for i386 and x86_64. This release corresponds to the upstream vendor 4.9 release. Also released in the updates repository for CentOS-4.9 are all updates through March 1st, 2011. If you are currently using an older CentOS 4 version, using this command will upgrade you to CentOS-4.9: yum upgrade NOTE: The upstream provider did not respin media for the 4.9 release and therefore the CentOS project will also not respin our install media. Installs moving forward will be off the 4.8 media and an upgrade will move you from version 4.8 to version 4.9. We do this to maintain compatibility with 3rd party kernel drivers which are designed to be installed as part of the installation process. This is the last expected set of changes to add new functionality to the CentOS 4. We will continue to provide security updates and bug fixes for CentOS 4 until its End-of-Life scheduled for February 29, 2012. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Major changes for this version are: * The kernel-utils package provides microcode_ctl utility code and the microcode data itself ? supplied by Intel ? to assist the kernel in updating the CPU microcode at system boot time. This microcode supports all current Intel x86- and Intel 64-based CPU models and takes advantage of the mechanism built-in to Linux that allows microcode to be updated after system boot. When loaded, the updated microcode corrects the behavior of various Intel processors, as described in processor specification updates issued by Intel for those processors. In the CentOS-4.9 release the kernel-utils package has been updated with the 2010-09-14 version of Intel's microcode. * OProfile in CentOS 4.9 now supports Intel Xeon (formerly codenamed Nehalem) processor performance events. * The KornShell (ksh) package in CentOS 4.9 has been upgraded to the upstream release version ksh93t+. * CentOS-4.9 provides an updated coreutils package, containing checksum utilities for the whole SHA-2 family, allowing a user to easily count or verify SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512 checksums. * CentOS-4.9 features version 3.6.13 of the Mozilla Firefox open source web browser. * SystemTap in CentOS-4.9 has been updated to version 1.3. Most notably, this update provides support for the newer kprobe capabilities. * OpenOffice 2.0 is now included in this release as a Technology Preview. This suite features several improvements, including ODF and PDF functionalities, support for digital signatures and greater compatibility with open suites in terms of format and interface. In addition to this, the OpenOffice 2.0 spreadsheet has enhanced pivot table support, and can now handle up to 65,000 rows. For these and other changes, please see the CentOS specific release notes here: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS4.9 the detailed upstream release notes here: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/4/html/4.9_Relea… CentOS-4 Documentation is here: http://www.centos.org/docs/4/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- All previous released CentOS versions are available at: http://vault.centos.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- To stay current with CentOS: Visit our website at http://www.centos.org/ Join the CentOS mailing list at: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos HowTos and other items on the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/ Join various team members on IRC at irc.freenode.net #centos -------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: It may take a couple days for some of the external mirrors to catch up. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Enjoy, The CentOS Development Team

1 0

Samba quota for AD users
by system minami 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Can someone please help how to enable samba quota for Active Directory users' home directory automatically ? Many thanks, Michael

4 6

unable to assign static IPv6
by Lars Nordin 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

I'm having a problem permanently assigning a static IPv6 address to my CentOS v5.5 box. I have IPv6 enabled and the link local address is automatically brought up. I can manually ifconfig the address but when I configure it in ifcfg-eth0 and restart the network init script the IPv6 address is not assigned. Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0: IPV6INT=yes IPV6ADDR=fdca:fefe:dace:07b1:0000:0002:B339:2817 $ cat /etc/sysconfig//network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes $ lsb_release -a LSB Version: :core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1- noarch Distributor ID: CentOS Description: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Release: 5.5 Codename: Final

3 3

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 release of CentOS-4.9
by Barry Brimer 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Quoting Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org>: > The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS > 4.9 for i386 and x86_64. Outstanding! Thanks CentOS team for all your hard work!

1 0

Re: [CentOS] virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
by Les Mikesell 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

On 3/2/2011 2:06 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > >>> Differently put, we already do this with servers. One big& fast Quad >>> XEON can run many client's Virtual Machines, very easily. And many of >>> those Virtual Machines host a few hundred websites, thus saving a lot >>> on rack space, electricity, etc, etc. >> >> Servers are normally optimized with lots of disk spindles to spread >> multi-user use of the one remaining slow resource around. > > True, but in a one-user-one-drive (or 2 drives in RAID1) setup, the > disk I/O wouldn't be a problem, or the limiting factor. I thought some of your scenarios involved doing things in both os's at once. Which will make them want the disk head to be in different places at the same time. >> Give the VM its own disk and it won't have much impact on the host. >> You'll probably still want to run video-intense things natively, though. >> And if you aren't a developer doing throwaway tests, what's the point >> of using a VM for resource-intensive things anyway? > > > There are many reasons why one would do this kind of things. Just > thinking of my normal day-to-day work, I often start-up a new VM to > test certain functionality of some software package, without affecting > anything on my PC. If it is at work, why not park the VM on a server that is probably better equipped? > My laptop runs Windows 7 at this stage, purely for > Quickbooks and a few other Windows-only applications. So, in this case > it would be nice to have Windows running permanently on my PC which > will allow the accounts person to still access it remotely on her PC > and I can still do stuff in Quickbooks as needed. But, I would prefer > real-time access. Then why not run it as the host? It probably handles sleep mode and waking up on different networks better than Centos anyway. Or as a VM, park it on a server where everyone who needs access can reach it remotely. > I think the major problem here is that the tools at hand, i.e. XEN + > Virtual Machine Manager (or for that matter VirtualBox / VMWare / etc) > isn't yet optimized for this kind of usage. > > I guess we need better VGA-passthrough drivers, and / or a more > optimized interface. Accessing the VM's via VNC / Remote Desktop / XN > / etc is also probably also a possibility. Have you tried vmware player with vmware tools installed in the guest for comparison? Or NX connecting to freenx in the case of a Linux guest? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS] RFC: video call recommendations
by Davis, Spencer 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

It does voice and video chat. There is a pluggin for the chrome browser. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -----Original Message----- From: John R Pierce [pierce(a)hogranch.com] Received: Wednesday, 02 Mar 2011, 2:38pm To: centos(a)centos.org [centos(a)centos.org] Subject: Re: [CentOS] RFC: video call recommendations On 03/02/11 10:03 AM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: > I run CentOS at home, not just at work... Anyway, I've got a friend in > Chicago who recently mentioned that they'd like to do videocalling. Now, > I've heard of skype, but a quick google says there's some problems on > Linux. I also see ekiga, and aMSN. > > Anyone here run such a beast, and have any recommendations or comments? > Obviously, must work on CentOS, not Ubuntu, or Fedora, or > TheLatestCoolestDistroThisMonth.... I believe google chat aka google talk works on linux too, and it has a video option. can't say I've tried it. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

Error: Missing Dependency: libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) is needed by package 6:kdepim-3.5.10-2.el5.x86_64 (installed)
by Chris Ross 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Hi Y'All, Yum update on CentOS 5 has for the last week or so started giving me the following errors root@neodymium 16:03:46 ~ # nice yum upgrade Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net * base: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net * epel: mirror01.th.ifl.net * extras: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror01.th.ifl.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror01.th.ifl.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing: mirror01.th.ifl.net * updates: mirror.as29550.net Setting up Upgrade Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) for package: kdepim ---> Package gnokii.x86_64 0:0.6.29-1.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libical.so.0()(64bit) for package: gnokii --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) for package: kdepim ---> Package libical.x86_64 0:0.46-2.el5 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution 6:kdepim-3.5.10-2.el5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) is needed by package 6:kdepim-3.5.10-2.el5.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) is needed by package 6:kdepim-3.5.10-2.el5.x86_64 (installed) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest None of the three workarounds listed work. Is there any action I should take or should I just wait for the problem to be resolved "upstream"? Suggestions welcomed, I would be grateful for the benefit of your collective wisdom. Many thanks, Chris R.

3 7

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss March 2011