Discuss October 2013

discuss@lists.centos.org

179 participants
157 discussions

hung nfs mount
by Les Mikesell 16 Oct '13

16 Oct '13

What is the best approach when an nfs mount hangs on a client but the server is OK? I have mount options of: rw,bg,soft,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 but whatever it did was not interruptable and would not shut down. There were some: Oct 15 09:08:32 dev-ngf-l-01 kernel: INFO: task gnome-settings-:19169 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Oct 15 09:08:32 dev-ngf-l-01 kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. messages on the console and /var/log/messages. Is this a bug or there a way to avoid it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

3 3

Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question
by SilverTip257 16 Oct '13

16 Oct '13

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Steve Clark <sclark(a)netwolves.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we are running 51 ipsec vpns on an Atom D510 at 1.66ghz and the load > average is .07. > @Steve: Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator and the CPU is handling all the crypto. Correct? @Terre: I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in terms of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors. And there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine. AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an integrated crypto accelerator [2]. If it wasn't for your web proxy requirements, etc an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded OS - think Voyage Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're researching right now though. [0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp [1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm [2] http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3 > > HTH, > Steve > > On 10/15/2013 02:13 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > > I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it. > > > > Thanks for the info. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf > > Of SilverTip257 > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter < > tporter(a)webpage-builders.com > >> wrote: > >> I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at > >> building a new one. > >> > >> The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with > >> Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients). > >> > >> I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am > >> unsure if this will work. > >> > > You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to run > > simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web. > > > > > >> I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W > Eight-Core > >> Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ? > >> > > Seems like overkill to me. > > > > I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system. One of > those > > mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts. > > > > Just my two cents. > > > > > >> Any thoughts? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Terre > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CentOS mailing list > >> CentOS(a)centos.org > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > > > > > > > -- > Stephen Clark > *NetWolves* > Director of Technology > Phone: 813-579-3200 > Fax: 813-882-0209 > Email: steve.clark(a)netwolves.com > http://www.netwolves.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //

5 5

xorg updates hose GUI with Nvidia driver
by B.J. McClure 16 Oct '13

16 Oct '13

Just a heads up that once again an xorg update has removed the link in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions that points to libglx.so.325.15 in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia thus breaking X. This should only effect those with nvidia proprietary driver. One of the following packages is the culprit but I have not tried to narrow it down. I have done updates and downgrades several times and it is quite reproducible. Oct 15 17:53:01 Updated: xorg-x11-server-common-1.13.0-11.1.el6.centos.1.x86_64 Oct 15 17:53:03 Updated: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.13.0-11.1.el6.centos.1.x86_64 Oct 15 17:53:03 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-mga-1.6.1-8.el6_4.x86_64 Oct 15 17:53:04 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.6.2-11.el6_4.1.x86_64 Oct 15 17:53:04 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-mach64-6.9.3-4.1.el6_4.x86_64 Cheers, B.J.

4 7

PXE: xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
by Riccardo Castellani 16 Oct '13

16 Oct '13

My network installation via PXE breaks when graphical installation starts, here my program.log: Running... /bin/mount -n -t auto -o ro,loop=/dev/loop0 /tmp/install.img /mnt/runtime 07:51:29,617 INFO : Running... ['udevadm', 'trigger', '--action=add', '--subsystem-match=net'] 07:51:29,660 INFO : Running... ['udevadm', 'trigger', '--action=add', '--subsystem-match=block'] 07:51:29,812 INFO : Running... ['udevadm', 'settle', '--timeout=300'] 07:51:30,454 INFO : Running... ['udevadm', 'trigger', '--action=add', '--subsystem-match=net'] 07:51:30,494 INFO : Running... ['udevadm', 'settle', '--timeout=300'] 07:51:33,182 INFO : Running... ['metacity', '--display', ':1', '--sm-disable'] 07:51:33,689 ERROR : Window manager warning: 0 stored in GConf key /desktop/gnome/peripherals/mouse/cursor_size is out of range 1 to 128 07:51:35,442 INFO : Running... ['xrandr', '-q'] 07:51:35,458 INFO : Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024 07:51:35,458 INFO : default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm 07:51:35,459 INFO : 1280x1024 60.0* 75.0 07:51:35,459 INFO : 1280x960 60.0 07:51:35,459 INFO : 1280x854 75.0 60.0 07:51:35,459 INFO : 1280x800 75.0 60.0 07:51:35,459 INFO : 1152x864 75.0 60.0 07:51:35,460 INFO : 1280x768 75.0 60.0 07:51:35,460 INFO : 1280x720 75.0 60.0 07:51:35,460 INFO : 1024x768 75.0 70.0 60.0 07:51:35,460 INFO : 1024x576 75.0 60.0 07:51:35,461 INFO : 960x600 60.0 07:51:35,461 INFO : 832x624 75.0 07:51:35,461 INFO : 960x540 60.0 07:51:35,461 INFO : 800x600 75.0 72.0 60.0 56.0 07:51:35,462 INFO : 768x576 60.0 07:51:35,462 INFO : 720x576 60.0 07:51:35,462 INFO : 856x480 60.0 07:51:35,462 INFO : 848x480 60.0 07:51:35,462 INFO : 800x480 75.0 60.0 07:51:35,463 INFO : 720x480 61.0 07:51:35,463 INFO : 640x480 75.0 73.0 67.0 60.0 07:51:35,463 INFO : 720x400 70.0 07:51:35,463 INFO : 640x400 72.0 07:51:35,464 INFO : 512x384 60.0 07:51:35,464 INFO : 400x300 60.0 07:51:35,464 INFO : 320x240 61.0 07:51:35,464 INFO : 320x200 71.0 07:51:35,464 ERROR : xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default 07:51:37,200 ERROR : Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x80000d (CentOS Ins) 07:51:37,201 ERROR : Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed. I tried to change monitor but I got the same result.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] no group package selection via PXE network installation
by Scott Robbins 16 Oct '13

16 Oct '13

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:26:35PM +0200, Riccardo Castellani wrote: > I'm trying to install centos 6.4 on my server A (which has 512 MB ram and no > cdrom) by PXE. You need more than 512 MB of RAM to do a graphic installation, I've forgotten the exact requirement. As for text install, RedHat has crippled it--you cannot choose packages or disk layout. Apparently Anaconda developers decided to focus upon the graphic install, and so, the only way to customize a text based install is to use a kickstart file. So, your options are to increase the RAM so you can get a GUI installation, use a kickstart file, or use an operating system where the developers still think like system administrators rather than smart phone users. (Yeah, I know that's unfair and FUD, but it is aggravating for something that is supposed to be a server O/S.) -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

3 3

installing on second drive
by Steve Clark 15 Oct '13

15 Oct '13

Hello list, I have two drives - the first drive currently has F14 on it. The second drive is empty. If I select custom partition and only partititon and format the second drive, will CentOS install on the second and not touch the first drive? This is using the installer from the CentOS 6.4 Live DVD. Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark(a)netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com

5 7

setuid or other ideas
by Gregory P. Ennis 15 Oct '13

15 Oct '13

Everyone, I am working on a Centos 5.9 system. I have an need to be able to activate a piece of software from /etc/smrsh that is activated when sendmail delivers the e-mail to this piece of software. I would like this piece of software to take on the user and group identities that are different than 'mail' which is what happens now. I want to use a user and group that is not root), so that the piece of software will be able to write (concatenate) to a file. I have never used setuid, but it appears that this will only allow a piece of software to be set to root. I really do not want to give that kind of privilege to this piece of software. Any ideas? -- Greg Ennis PoMec Corporation www.PoMec.Net

3 3

no group package selection via PXE network installation
by Riccardo Castellani 15 Oct '13

15 Oct '13

I'm trying to install centos 6.4 on my server A (which has 512 MB ram and no cdrom) by PXE. I exported installation tree 'CentOS-6.4-i386-bin-DVD1.iso' via http on server 'Z', all according to Centos howto (copied vmlinuz, pxelinux.cfg, initrd.img , started tftpd+dhcpd services) Boot process is OK (in text mode! I think it's a memory problem); it's required keyboard type, time zone, network parameters, disk partitions, ... but no installation type is required (basic, minimal, server, ...) and no packages selection ! Installation goes on installing the packages but without choosing them! I'd like to choose type of installation and the details of packages, any options as I used directly installation dvdrom1. I don't want to use kickstart file ! My 'pxelinux.cfg/default' file: timeout 9000 default menu.c32 menu title ########## PXE Boot Menu ########## label 1 menu label ^1) Install CentOS 6 kernel centos64/vmlinuz append initrd=centos64/initrd.img repo=http://a.b.x.y/centos6 devfs=nomount ramdisk_size=152000 label 2 menu label ^2) Boot from local drive localboot What do you think ?

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 104, Issue 6
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 15 Oct '13

15 Oct '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2013:1421 CentOS 6 glibc Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:24:43 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1421 CentOS 6 glibc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20131014192443.GA65354(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1421 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1421.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4c811ca786013f6bd60d6eae101388eecbbdca862a22b2732a934612bd3fe877 glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm b419d1396f986e664d8119a01bf88f0108fc45ebe91a1651ca25c5a39efe3c9e glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm 532559adc4274c2fe89bf4d0699f416a6797656a9639deddcd54b83a8ce9a996 glibc-devel-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm 8553a4f2592492b8612d46eaa62e0f545bf05ee189388cfc10ee0272866655b7 glibc-headers-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm 9706e0a295c60f0dab4b889e8004ef9d570bdd5906f9bb4cbf640e0f6cb399d3 glibc-static-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm 144d1d0770ce82615399e1feacd70091c7f8ebfe95462f5c30bad0e2b41ac85d glibc-utils-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm 38d2d152916ebec32c112477b4b22dcb4054d70c197a1d2965acf42761121998 nscd-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm x86_64: 4c811ca786013f6bd60d6eae101388eecbbdca862a22b2732a934612bd3fe877 glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm 7dbb14b789c218baa5687cada508519a3d37f4fbd3a7beac332dcec7db33789e glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm 18a8620b6432a0aed14af936b953ee190f41711e82f5db6b28118d2f7211f2c8 glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm 532559adc4274c2fe89bf4d0699f416a6797656a9639deddcd54b83a8ce9a996 glibc-devel-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm f7819f61defc6d6c34deca6e620fdde350c42de8246fb92f369d61e2e7c95567 glibc-devel-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm a3265156925c1543c78291d8fd5a9f922bdd84e5e792f35667ff48f01f983e20 glibc-headers-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm 9706e0a295c60f0dab4b889e8004ef9d570bdd5906f9bb4cbf640e0f6cb399d3 glibc-static-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm e1885832e42718c5c2f34c6d808d86465a5e40338fccdf56d5af08e18ea44ecd glibc-static-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm 441ed8250632fd3a32b577de20e7b5de90f20c28c41909c63703ed9425ceb5b6 glibc-utils-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm d667954bcc7dcc96158e51277570f6c64b172d8bbb71f9b0a5f0cf4dc2e9b6b8 nscd-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm Source: a0ca8e634128441fd60351d481300e9e974e86212b87816a2f2f979063c2718b glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 104, Issue 6 ***********************************************

1 0

yum checksum for updates fails
by Strimpakos Giorgos 15 Oct '13

15 Oct '13

Hello, this is my first time sending to this list. I tried to found the most appropriate place to ask my question, and the most matching list was this. I hope not to be off-topic. Today, I tried to make a yum update to my centos machines, and I got an error for the updates channel. The error was: Metadata file does not match checksum Is there an issue on this?

3 5

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
16
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss October 2013