Discuss May 2014

discuss@lists.centos.org

165 participants
146 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Sorry
by Chris Weisiger 19 May '14

19 May '14

I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post, but I believe this thread has gone on way to long. Lets drop it and get back to what this mailing list is all about. I would rather read posts about the same technical things over and over again that have been asked hundreds of times. But when questions like that get asked, alot of times people reply by saying "search the archives" or have you searched google yet. Where as the top/bottom posting question I believe should be answered with the search the archives or search google answer. This is just my 2 cents. Now back to your regularly scheduled questions. -----Original Message----- From: "Dave Stevens" <geek(a)uniserve.com> Sent: ‎5/‎17/‎2014 7:07 PM To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos(a)centos.org>; "Alexander Dalloz" <ad+lists(a)uni-x.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Sorry Quoting Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists(a)uni-x.org>: > Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning: >> >> Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200 >> lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters. > > False argument. > +1 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

4 3

setting the device queue_depth
by axel.weber＠cbc.de 19 May '14

19 May '14

Hi, Due to limitations of our Storage we need to set the device queue_depth to 4. I did this with a script that basically does this: echo 4 > /sys/block/sdft/device/queue_depth. But after a few minutes it starts to grow until it reaches 32 again. What could cause that behavior? Furthermore the system doesn' t load my qlogic options. I have set them to: cat /etc/modprobe.d/qlogic.conf alias scsi_hostadapter1 qla2xxx options qla2xxx ql2xmaxqdepth=4 But the max queue depth is cat /sys/module/qla2xxx/parameters/ql2xmaxqdepth 32 Any help would be appreciated. Centos: CentOS release 6.3 (Final) Storage: DDN 9900 Qlogic: 2560 (using distri firmware) Cheers Axel

2 1

Samba4 questions
by Steve Campbell 19 May '14

19 May '14

I'm a little new to Samba when used as more than just a simple place to mount a single user to a single share, but we're now getting ready to replace our Netware servers with Samba, and I guess that means Active Directory DC. As I read more and more about this beast, I keep finding pages that indicate the samba4 rpms supplied with the Centos/RH distribution are not the full version and that I should get them from either samba.org or certain other sources that provide complete versions. These pages are a little dated, but not that old. Can anyone provide insight into what they've done in this situation and whether the samba rpms are now full versions? Most of what I have found on the web is dated around when samba4 just came out of beta through a little later. There doesn't seem to be much documentation on this subject on the web or through Amazon, so half of my time is spent searching instead of reading. A good source for reading would be appreciated as well. I can find plenty examples, just not definitive manuals. steve campbell

9 17

Re: [CentOS] Samba4 questions
by Alain Péan 19 May '14

19 May '14

Le 22/04/2014 22:14, Reindl Harald a écrit : >>> not perhaps, for sure >>> >> >>> >>samba-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64 >>> >>samba-client-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64 >>> >>samba-common-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64 >>> >>samba-libs-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64 >>> >> >> > >> >I notice it is "samba-common-4....", so samba 4 will be the default in RHEL 7, not samba 3.6.x? > samba 3.x is dead > Fedora did the swicth to 4.x long ago > RHEL7 is based on Fedora 19 / Fedora 20 > Thanks for the information. Samba 4 domains are a very different beast than samba 3.x ones (NT4 style). A samba 4 (AD style) includes its own DNS, its own LDAP etc... Alain

4 5

CENTOS and GlusterFS
by Alessandro Baggi 19 May '14

19 May '14

Hi list, I'm planning to setup a two-node "cluster" with file replication and samba. I've used drbd in the past with success, but now there isn't drbd on the official repo but only from elrepo. I want follow centos Line and than switch to GlusterFS. Said that, I'm new to GlusterFS. I have two hosts with a 2tb disk space for replica. I've ridden that glusterfs is not compatible with smb/cifs/nfs and that for this purpose I must mount locally the volume and share it with samba and the hosts must act as client and server at the same time. It is possibile shares a mounted disk on /data with samba, and apply a replica volume on /data without using glusterfs export? Example: [Host1] [Host2] /data -> smb /data -> smb gluster_replica<---------------->gluster_replica Ip and services will be managed from corosync+pacemaker. There will be problems and complication with this configuration about replication/sync? Thanks in advance. Alessandro.

4 3

firefox-29.0-5.1.el6
by Νικόλαος Γεωργόπουλος 17 May '14

17 May '14

New compilation of firefox (v. 29.0) build with 1) devtools-2 (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/readme) 2) python27 (from SCL) ( http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.5/i386/external_products/… ) 3) icu-last-50.1.2 from remi (http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/) https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B9RlkKQB1POSOXk1OG5KODJNWFk&export=download https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSNW9YaWxBVWR6UVk/edit Sources: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSems0VXNIWXVuSjg/edit?usp=shari… https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSY0RJQTFQWlk0N3M/edit?usp=shari… Waiting for comments ngeorgop

1 0

Pionee red
by lsatenstein＠yahoo.com 16 May '14

16 May '14

<input type="hidden" name="henugu" value="was reaching the end of his life And despite Rons frequent complaints that Scabbers was both "><p></p><h5>i left you a confidential message</h5><p></p><a href="http://107.183.122.235/?xo=ne&jerixipo=&id=Y2VudG9zQGNlbnRvcy5vcmc=&wotelar…" >Display full email content</a>

1 0

Re-mount a drive using its label name
by Raghuv Adhepalli 16 May '14

16 May '14

Hello everybody, I would like your opinion on the following question, why this happens in centos and how to fix this (or a possible work around). I have a drive with no partitions and formatted with xfs filesystem. I give the drive a custom label "mydrive" and I mount it under /dev/mountpnts/mydrive. Then, I add a corresponding entry to fstab. These, are the steps I followed, mkfs.xfs -L mydrive -f /dev/sdf mkdir /dev/mountpnts/mydrive mount -L mydrive /dev/mountpnts/mydrive/ cat /etc/fstab, LABEL=mydrive /dev/mountpnts/mydrive xfs noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier,logbufs=8 0 0 These steps mount the drive under the mount point specified. If I remove the drive and insert it back in after a while, the drive doesn't mount, even though I have the required entry in fstab. `mount -a` doesn't seem to work and provides me the following output, mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdj, missing codepage or helper program, or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so If I restart my server, the drive gets mounted in the correct mount point and works fine. Can someone please shed some light on why a restart is required to re-mount a drive and if there is way to mount the drive without a restart. Thanks, Raghuv Adhepalli.

5 8

What just got updated
by Wes James 16 May '14

16 May '14

I checked for updates and it had 5 to do so I started that, left and came back and the update panel was gone. Is there a way to check what was updated? (centos 6.5) Thanks, -wes

4 4

Re: [CentOS] Repo w/ chrome?
by James B. Byrne 16 May '14

16 May '14

On Thu, May 15, 2014 12:57, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: > > On May 13, 2014, at 1:27 PM, Darr247 <darr247(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 13 May 2014 @15:12 zulu, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: >>> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please? >>> >>> >> >> Hmmmm... how to find Richard Lloyd's script? >> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Install+Chrome+on+CentOS+6 >> >> Ah! There it is - http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/ >> Now, why does Google's algorithm put all those other sites above his in >> the results when they all reference his site/script? > > Maybe Googles (search algorithms are) not _that_ smart after all. > Perhaps it is because he is not paying Google anything for his listing? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss May 2014