Discuss July 2014

discuss@lists.centos.org

211 participants
225 discussions

How to have two interfaces with dhcp using networkd but taking the dns/ntp stuff from only one
by Mauricio Tavares 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

Ok, we can take both but needs to be in a specific order. So, we have two ethernet interfaces, A and B. And both are defined in /etc/systemd/network/ to use dhcp. How to guarantee that the crap provided by dhcp to A (dns, gateway, ntp) is the default? To use an example, /etc/resolv.conf should end up like nameserver IP.for.A.DNS nameserver IP.for.B.DNS domain A.domain.com Now, this must be done using only systemd stuff

2 2

CentOS 7 Anaconda GUI resolution
by Daniel Johnson 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings! I tried installing CentOS v7 (1406) to an old spare machine, and the video card apparently don't play well with X. It is incorrectly saying that either monitor I connect is only able to support 640x480, when one is 1024x768 and the other supports a higher (but now forgotten) resolution. In no way do I expect a fix to be added just to support my antique. :) What I'd like to find, or have added to future CentOS installation discs, is a way to force the GUI resolution. Alternately, if nothing below 800x600 will show the GUI properly perhaps the installer should just forcibly set that as the minimum, no matter what the hardware claims to allow? Details of the hardware and such follow, let me know if you need more. =-=-=-=-=-= Under the normal boot from the normal DVD, graphics-mode output is discolored and squashed to the left of the display. In the "Basic Graphics" troubleshooting mode the output is clear and proper, but still just 640x480. Server: Gateway E-9422R Video card: Matrox Graphics MGA G200e, PCI 102b:0522 I captured the output of lspci, dmidecode, /tmp, and /var/log in both Normal and Basic Graphics boot modes. The file is 1,692,776 bytes and has the following SHA1 checksum: f9cd800ced963e29d0bb3e4381596dc3b61a4c4c *CentOS7_InstallerResolutionProblem.tar.xz It can be downloaded from this link: http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=55151826488339350948 Daniel Johnson djohnson(a)progman.us -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO/N1gACgkQ6vGcUBY+ge+5CwCgnRG1En1ZORoj5Q8tKFyApX13 xukAoJ309KaZJjZAc69REBz9p0J9Yxum =iTJm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 in VirtualBox
by Wes James 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

On Jul 10, 2014, at 01:02 PM, Vojin Urosevic <vu(a)linuxusers.com> wrote: > What does ifconfig show? Is eth0 up, if not try to manually start it. > > vojin+++ On mac: enp0s3: with flags, mtu, ether, etc. lo: standard stuff -wes

6 9

CentOS 7 in VirtualBox
by Wes James 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

I installed CentOS 7 in VirtualBox in OS X Yosemite, but the NIC is not getting an IP address. So I thought it was a problem with the thunderbolt adapter. I then installed CentOS 7 in VirtualBox on a box with CentOS 6.5. The network doesn't work in the VM either. Anyone tried CentOS 7 in VirtualBox (latest version) and have the network working? Thanks, -wes

5 4

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 in VirtualBox
by Wes James 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Thomas Eriksson <thomas.eriksson(a)slac.stanford.edu> wrote: > > > On 07/10/2014 11:19 AM, Wes James wrote: > > I installed CentOS 7 in VirtualBox in OS X Yosemite, but the NIC is > > not getting an IP address. So I thought it was a problem with the > > thunderbolt adapter. I then installed CentOS 7 in VirtualBox on a > > box with CentOS 6.5. The network doesn't work in the VM either. > > Anyone tried CentOS 7 in VirtualBox (latest version) and have the > > network working? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -wes > > > I'm running CentOS7 in VirtualBox 3.4.12 on RHEL6.5 without issues. > Emulated network adapter is Intel PRO/1000 MT. > > Thomas Hmmm. I have windows 8.1, linux mint vm's on my centos 6.5 box and they all work with networking, but centos 7 vm doesn't have any networking. Do I need to install the VM tools for the network to work. I don't remember having to do that. In cents 7 vm's, I don't get the nat'd IP address that is usually there :( Thanks, -wes

2 1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 in VirtualBox
by Wes James 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:33 PM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Do you have the network set to "bridge" mode in virtual box? > > Thanks, > > andrew No. Nat. I tried bridging, but didn't get any IP there too. Thanks, -wes

1 0

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 on a USB stick
by Wes James 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard(a)alice.it> wrote: > I tried dd-ing the ISO onto a USB stick, as suggested in > <http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 >, > but it didn't boot. > Did anyone have better luck with this? I used this on my mac and it worked: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey I had to format the usb stick to fat with master boot record selected. I don't know why I had to do that first, but dd wouldn't work properly without doing that first. -wes

2 1

Searching for centos-release-7-0.1406.el7.centos.2.3.src.rpm
by Markus Steinborn 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

Hi, I'm searching for centos-release-7-0.1406.el7.centos.2.3.src.rpm. Id like to customize it for installations without internet available, so using our local private mirror. I did not find it on: http://vault.centos.org/7.0.1406/os/Source/SPackages/ http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/centos-release/20140704062900/7-0.1406… https://git.centos.org/log/!!!!rpms!centos-release.git/refs!heads!c7 nor anywhere else. Greetings from Germany Markus Steinborn

3 4

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?
by James B. Byrne 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

On Tue, July 8, 2014 08:09, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > > That presumes that your conservative attitude is the majority opinion > though. Systemd is one of the features that I have been looking forward > to in CentOS 7 because of the new capabilities it provides so while this > will surely drive some people away it will actually attract others and > if you think that this will lead to some sort of great exodus then I > think you are mistaken. Not everybody is this uncomfortable with change. > > Regards, > Dennis > > Well, while Linus Torvald is not everyone, he is certainly someone. And I do not believe, although I could be mistaken on the point, that Linus's current thoughts on Systemd would be considered printable in a public forum. At a guess, I would put it right up there with Gnome2 in his estimation -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

Re: [CentOS] UC Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?
by Rushton Martin 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

Wasn't there a TV series in the 1960s about a US soldier who got made up to general thanks to the accidental over punching of paper tape? Regards, Martin, >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On >Behalf Of Always Learning >Sent: 10 July 2014 11:43 >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ? > > >On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 10:33 +0530, Arun Khan wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:02 AM, <m.roth(a)5-cent.us> wrote: >> > >> > 'Ey! What'cho got 'gainst punch cards? >> > >> >> and let's not forget the punched tapes :) > >5 hole or 7 hole ? > > >-- >Regards, > >Paul. >England, EU. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England & Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com.

4 3

← Newer
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
23
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss July 2014