Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

I thought Y2K was over with?
by Gilbert Sebenste 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

Apparently not. On a command line, type: date '+%G' First Spamassassin's bug (now fixed, type "sa-update" as user root), and now this... ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** *******************************************************************************

3 3

questions on debuginfo.centos.org
by Ryan J M 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

Recently I add a debuginfo repo into my /etc/yum.repos.d/ <start> [debuggery] name=CentOS-$releasever - DebugInfo baseurl=http://debuginfo.centos.org/$releasever/$basearch/ priority=1 <end> then yum update and list shows <start> kdiff3.i386 0.9.92-14.el5 epel kding.i386 0.4.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge kdirstat.i386 2.5.2-2.el5.rf rpmforge kdnssd-avahi.i386 0.1.3-0.1.20060713svn.fc6 base kdnssd-avahi-debuginfo.i386 0.1.3-0.1.20060713svn.el5.centos debuggery kdnssd-avahi-devel.i386 0.1.3-0.1.20060713svn.fc6 base kernel-PAE.i686 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 updates kernel-PAE-debuginfo.i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus debuggery kernel-PAE-devel.i686 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 updates kernel-debug.i686 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 updates kernel-debug-debuginfo.i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 debuggery kernel-debug-devel.i686 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 updates kernel-debuginfo.i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus debuggery kernel-debuginfo-common.i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus debuggery kernel-doc.noarch 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 updates kernel-xen.i686 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 updates kernel-xen-debuginfo.i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus debuggery kernel-xen-devel.i686 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 updates kerneloops.i386 0.11-1.el5.rf rpmforge kexec-tools.i386 1.102pre-77.el5.3 updates kexec-tools-debuginfo.i386 1.102pre-21.el5 debuggery keychain.noarch 2.6.8-1.el5.rf rpmforge <end> I notice that the kernel debuginfo version mismatch with my currenting running kernel, then I go to the site http://debuginfo.centos.org/5/i386/ , and there do exist the following ones : <start> [ ] kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.el5.centos.plus.i686.rpm 01-Apr-2009 13:57 175M [ ] kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5.i686.rpm 30-Sep-2009 20:17 166M [ ] kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-164.6.1.el5.centos.plus.i686.rpm 04-Nov-2009 17:24 186M [ ] kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-164.6.1.el5.i686.rpm 04-Nov-2009 01:43 166M [ ] kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.centos.plus.i686.rpm 16-Dec-2009 19:28 186M [ ] kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm 16-Dec-2009 05:27 166M [ ] kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-164.el5.i686.rpm 03-Sep-2009 10:54 166M <end> Here comes my `uname -a` <start> Linux xas 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 15 21:04:57 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux <end> and my yum install log <start> root@xas~ > yum install kernel-debuginfo\* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * epel: ftp.kddilabs.jp * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel-debuginfo.i686 0:2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus set to be updated ---> Package kernel-debuginfo-common.i686 0:2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: kernel-debuginfo i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus debuggery 165 M kernel-debuginfo-common i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus debuggery 29 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 194 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): kernel-debuginfo-common-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos. | 29 MB 03:35 (2/2): kernel-debuginf (35%) 23% [==- ] 147 kB/s | 40 MB 14:36 ETA <end> So, Is it the problem of debuginfo.centos.org/5/repodata or I missed anything? Thanks and HAPPY NEW YEAR! -- FIXME if it is wrong.

1 1

need to free space on a root partition.
by Yan Yu 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

Hello, there, Happy new year everyone! I am puzzled here. Could some expert help me shed some light on this? this may not be a centos specific Q.. i have a linux machine. and the root partition (/) is full.. so I moved a dir from /data to /var (/var is on a different partition), and created a link from /data/fa to /var/xyz, the files under /var/xyz is about 8G, du /var/fa 8701248 /var/fa so I thought this should free some space for me, but when I used df, it gave me similar results before and after the move.. and my rpm installation would fail due to the lack of space.. Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/cciss/c0d0p6 15235040 15232452 0 100% / /dev/cciss/c0d0p8 other partitions have free space.... I was confused on why moving a 8G file to another partition did not free some space for me? and I did see that the disk usage for the destination partition/disk increases after the move.. any pointer is appreciated! yan

2 2

yum centos repo dependency hell for matlab loaddap
by Dave 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

I've got matlab installed: < M A T L A B (R) > Copyright 1984-2009 The MathWorks, Inc. Version 7.8.0.347 (R2009a) 64-bit (glnxa64) February 12, 2009 I want to install loaddap. I downloaded an rpm from http://opendap.org/download/ml-structs.html. # yum --nogpgcheck localinstall loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security Setting up Local Package Process[snip] --> Processing Dependency: libmex.so()(64bit) for package: loaddap --> Processing Dependency: libmx.so()(64bit) for package: loaddap --> Finished Dependency Resolution loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libmex.so()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libdapclient.so.3()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libdap.so.9()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libmat.so()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libmx.so()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libdap >= 3.8.0 is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libdapclient.so.3()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libmx.so()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libdap >= 3.8.0 is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libdap.so.9()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libmat.so()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libmex.so()(64bit) is needed by package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm) Apparently my libdap is too old: # rpm -q libdap libdap-3.7.8-1.el5.1 And it is current with the centos repos, # yum update libdap Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security [snip] No Packages marked for Update so I need a good rev source rpm

2 2

unsuscribe
by mvaras＠inf.utfsm.cl 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

unsuscribe

2 1

Tyan s4985 motherboard and lm_sensors
by Tom Bishop 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

Trying to get cpu temps from lm_sensors for a Tyan s4985 motherboard, just installed centos 5.4. Tyan release some lm_sensors conf files and other information which I have done, but I am not getting any cpu temps. I was wondering if anyone out there was running this board and if you have gotten temps working for your cpu, here is my output...Thanks in advance. w83627hf-isa-0c00 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) VCore 2: +1.55 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) +3.3V: +3.49 V (min = +2.82 V, max = +3.79 V) +5V: +5.24 V (min = +6.40 V, max = +5.54 V) ALARM +12V: +5.78 V (min = +12.28 V, max = +12.28 V) ALARM -12V: -6.93 V (min = +6.06 V, max = +5.65 V) ALARM -5V: -3.84 V (min = +2.49 V, max = +0.28 V) ALARM V5SB: +5.73 V (min = +6.69 V, max = +5.86 V) ALARM VBat: +3.09 V (min = +1.66 V, max = +0.82 V) ALARM fan1: 0 RPM (min = 10227 RPM, div = 2) ALARM fan2: 0 RPM (min = 6250 RPM, div = 2) ALARM fan3: 0 RPM (min = 2789 RPM, div = 2) ALARM temp1: +41°C (high = -54°C, hyst = -54°C) sensor = thermistor ALARM temp2: +43.0°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor temp3: +45.5°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor vid: +0.000 V (VRM Version 0.0) alarms: beep_enable: Sound alarm enabled

1 0

Re: [CentOS] which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better
by Les Bell 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

ann kok <oiyankok(a)yahoo.ca> wrote: >> Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by date? << The book "Perl for System Administration ", (David N. Blank-Edelman, O'Reilly, 2000) has a chapter on using Perl to analyse log files, rotate and compress them, etc. Luckily, this chapter is the "free sample" they provide online - see http://oreilly.com/catalog/perlsysadm/chapter/ch09.html Sorted. I mean, problem solved. Best, --- Les Bell [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 9451 1144

1 0

which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better
by ann kok 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

Hi I have apache log file around 7.6G and record half year Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by date? and finally I can remove that big file and still keep the record. I have problem when using vi and it uses up the server memory Thank you for your help __________________________________________________________________ Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane with All new Yahoo! Mail: http://ca.promos.yahoo.com/newmail/overview2/

4 3

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up
by Jerry Geis 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

lists-centos wrote: > What IPnumbers did you give the two new machines? What does your DNS > look like. > > >From the outside, mail will be delivered to the MX- (or if that > doesn't exist A-) record machine (based on the IPnumber in the DNS > record) for the FQDN on the message. > > - Rick > > ------------ Original Message ------------ > >> Date: Friday, January 01, 2010 02:27:12 PM -0500 >> From: Jerry Geis <geisj(a)pagestation.com> >> To: CentOS ML <centos(a)centos.org> >> Subject: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more >> > servers messes things up > >> Hi all, >> >> I had one server running centos 4.7 i686 everything was fine with >> incoming mail. >> >> I now added two more servers centos 5.4 x86_64 and gave them >> machine names all >> part of the same domain as machine 1. I noticed that incoming >> emails are being >> round robined to all three machines. At this time I really just >> want the one original machine >> to handle my incoming email... The other two new machines are for >> other purposes. >> >> How do I tell the two new machines that all incoming email send to >> machine 1. >> Is there an easy way to do that? At this point I just turned off >> the two new machines >> and all mail is coming into the original machine just like before. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jerry >> > All three machines have the same FQDN. something like A.mydomain.com, B.mydomain.com, C.mydomain.com The IP numbers are X.Y.Z.170, .171 and .172 All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain name. It is a big deal to request changes from the provider so I was hoping there was a way to just tell the two new machines that incoming email to them just send on over to the the first machine. Is there a way to do that - or am I going about this the wrong way? Jerry

6 7

Lost mdadm.conf
by robert mena 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

Hi, I lost my mdadm.conf (and /proc/mdadm shows nothing useful) and I'd like to mount the filesystem again. So I've booted using rescue but I was wondering if I can do a command like this safely (i.e without losing the data previously stored). mdadm -C /dev/md0 --level=raid0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 Where of course the raid devices and the /dev/x are the correct ones

6 18

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss