Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Firefox seg faults
by Rob Kampen 20 Mar '09

20 Mar '09

Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkampen@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkampen@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386 One machine (home) works fine on my web page www.ndgonline.net/ndg/ the other (work) seg faults - I guess it is due to the godaddy link on the bottom of the page, as plain old google loads fine. I started this debacle by removing firefox, flash and the plugin directories on my work machine under /usr/lib/mozilla and /usr/lib64/mozilla as my page loads were very slow (only the godaddy bit) and also any video content (flash based I think) failed to play, yet all this works fine on the home machine. I guess there is some common lib somewhere that is corrupt, any ideas of where to start looking? I did have nspluginwrapper installed on the work machine, however this is no longer installed and is not installed on the home machine. Do not see what this provides, as I have more success playing multimedia content at home than at work...... Heading away from the work machine, thus ability to check if any changes work will be limited until I am in front of the screens tomorrow, however I can ssh and check packages etc. Thanks for your help. Rob

3 9

w command about user
by chloe K 20 Mar '09

20 Mar '09

Hi I use w command to get user is "2 users" but I only have connection one ls any process dead? But I check other centos machine is same How can I check it? Thank you [root@host ~]# w 7:22:26 up 20 days, 23:20, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT chloe pts/0 dsl-203-18-20-82. 7:22 0.00s 0.09s 0.09s sshd: chloe [priv] --------------------------------- Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now!

2 1

Bug with cron ?
by MOKRANI Rachid 20 Mar '09

20 Mar '09

Hi, Is there a bug under cron on CentOS 5.2 x86_64 ? kernel 2.6.18-92 Something is strange on my system. I have a simple shell script to run on many computers . When I run this script by hand, everything works fine on all workstations. But if I start this script via crontab vmplayer is never install with no errors. Any ideas ? Best regards. #/usr/bin/yum -e 0 -d 0 -y remove VMware-Player.x86_64 #/usr/bin/yum -e 0 -d 0 -y install VMware-Player-2.5.1-126130.x86_64 #/usr/bin/vmware-networks --stop #/usr/bin/vmware-networks --migrate-network-settings /vmware/virtualmachine #/usr/bin/vmware-networks --start #/sbin/chkconfig --level 345 vmware on __________________________ Ce message (et toutes ses pièces jointes éventuelles) est confidentiel et établi à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme à sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'IFP décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message. This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. IFP should not be liable for this message. Visitez notre site Web / Visit our web site : http://www.ifp.fr __________________________

4 8

Re: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification
by russ＠vshift.com 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

Are these on the same ip, but different ports? I suggest setting up two different hostnames. Russ ------Original Message------ From: dnk Sender: centos-bounces(a)centos.org To: CentOS Mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list Sent: Mar 19, 2009 6:53 PM Subject: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into the system behind the FW. Now if i connect to the IP (sine the public one is shared), anytime i connect to the other system, I get the host verification failed error and have to remove the IP from the known_hosts file. What is the best (secure) way to get around this? I know i can disable the check, but that is not my preferred way. Thanks. d _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

2 1

ssh - alternate ports, and host verification
by dnk 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into the system behind the FW. Now if i connect to the IP (sine the public one is shared), anytime i connect to the other system, I get the host verification failed error and have to remove the IP from the known_hosts file. What is the best (secure) way to get around this? I know i can disable the check, but that is not my preferred way. Thanks. d

2 2

Fwd: broken lame/mp3 output (was: Re: Problem with ecasound on CentOS 5.2, x86_64)
by MHR 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

I posed a question about this a while back, and Kai found the problem and sent this workaround: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kai Vehmanen <kvehmanen(a)eca.cx> > Date: Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM > Subject: broken lame/mp3 output (was: Re: Problem with ecasound on CentOS 5.2, x86_64) > To: MHR <mhullrich(a)gmail.com> > Cc: ecasound-list(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > Hi, > > : > > Fortunately, a workaround is easy, just add: > > --cut-- > ext-cmd-mp3-output = lame -b %B -s %S -r --little-endian -S - %f > --cut-- > > ... to your ~/.ecasound/ecasoundrc and ta-daa it works. > This works nicely, so if anyone else was having this problem, here's the fix. mhr

1 0

Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow
by sumit agarwal 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad . i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300 evrey thing seems to be running very slow. any help would be welcome thanx Sumit

4 8

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:0358 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) evolution - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2009:0355 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) evolution and evolution-data-server - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2009:0354 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) evolution-data-server - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:47:31 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)centos.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0358 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) evolution - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090318204730.GS23300(a)centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0358 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0358.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/evolution-1.4.5-25.el3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/evolution-devel-1.4.5-25.el3.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/evolution-1.4.5-25.el3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/evolution-devel-1.4.5-25.el3.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored

1 0

SELinux - different context on subdirectories
by Marcus Moeller 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

Hi all, I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context: system_u:object_r:var_t Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a different context. So I tried to set e.g.: semanage fcontext -a -t samba_share_t /srv/samba /sbin/restorecon -v /srv/samba but the context is always reset to: system_u:object_r:var_t What am I missing? Best Regards Marcus

2 4

5.3 and ext4
by Jerry Geis 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe? I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4? Has this already been fixed? What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4? Thought maybe today we would start seeing 5.3 showing up... Looking forward to it. Jerry

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss