Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

unsubscribe
by Nyarai Tunjera 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Nyarai Tunjera ICT Director Gateway Primary School Box EH 121 Emeraldhill Zimbabwe www.gatewayprimary.co.zw Forever God is Faithful Be exalted oh GOD above the heavens Let your Glory fill ALL the earth. Great is OUR God -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

13 24

Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
by John R Pierce 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: > I've been buying from the Smart-UPS and Back-UPS range. Those should be ok, > shouldn't they? SmartUPS, OK. BackUPS, cheap consumer junk. I've had to toss out dozens of various BackUPS units, mostly in the 450-600VA range... They act like they have a dead/weak battery, so I replace the battery with a brand new one, and the unit is dead. They are typically 2-3 years old at this point, so hardly worth bothering with.

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
by John R Pierce 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: > Oh, didn't know about Best Power. Is that something like Eatons budget-line > brand or something? > Best Power made the excellent midsized FerrUPS units 10+ years ago. washing machine sized 7kva kinda stuff. built like a tank, very serviceable. Eaton also acquired Sola, and AFAIK, PowerWare was built from a merge of Best Power and Sola.

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
by Les Mikesell 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: >> >>> Marking words: "used" to be best? Which is the best now then? APC is >>> apparantely not an option as they suck bigtime IMO, so what's? Powerware and >>> APC are the two biggest and most wellknown UPS-manufacturers I know of. >> APC does make a full line of units. Perhaps you aren't buying the right >> ones if they aren't serving you well. > > I've been buying from the Smart-UPS and Back-UPS range. Those should be ok, > shouldn't they? That depends on how important it is to never fail. If it is extremely important, you might want something with redundant components like the Symmetra line. These are designed to keep working with some failed components and to allow you to replace parts with the equipment on bypass but still running. > All in all about a handfull of them. They're quite pricey... 90% > of them suffered some kind of a circuit board failure. Not what you'd usually > expect from a UPS, rather you'd expect the battery to give up first. I bought > them over a few years, so it shouldn't be a bad batch or something like that. You might blame one or two on bad components, but this sounds like something is wrong with the input power at your location. I assume they are lasting at least through the 2 year warranty period. We have at least a few dozen of them and haven't noticed any pattern of problems other than aging batteries. Are you tracking the in/out power levels on the smart units to see what they have to deal with? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

4 3

java 1.3.1 for CentOS
by Indunil Jayasooriya 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Hi List, I am looking for java java 1.3.1 RPM for CentOS 4.5. I googled. I found below URL for it. http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/5773889/com/IBMJava2-JRE-1.3.1-… R u okay with it. Your ideas Pls? -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya

3 2

Linux HA or Heartbeat IP address question
by Devraj Mukherjee 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Hi all, I am following the guide on HowToForge to get Heartbeat going for two Apache web servers (http://www.howtoforge.com/high_availability_heartbeat_centos) a quick question for anyone who might have a similar setup. Do I have to assign the service IP to either of the NICs or does Heartbeat do that automagically? Thanks -- "The secret impresses no-one, the trick you use it for is everything" - Alfred Borden (The Prestiege)

2 1

Redistributing CentOS
by James Bensley 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Hey Listees, Just a quick question. I hope this isn't received incorrectly by everyone as I do mean the best for the CentOS project; I am wondering if it would be frowned upon to upload CentOS to my RapidShare account. I understand I can freely distribute CentOS but to what extent? In its simplest form I only really want to upload CentOS 5.2 to my RapidShare account for speed. I had to download it twice this weekend at two difference remote sites and sometimes the mirror was a bit slow. Generally they are quite fast but I mean with RapidShare I can get 50Mbps compared to normal 6-10Mbps from some mirrors. I understand it depends on the line I am downloading from and the load on the mirror etc but because fools like myself and many others have paid RapidShare accounts we can download things super quick with a vary reliable supplier. I am wondering why I can't find CentOS on there already as that was the first place I looked hoping I could download the DVD install straight from there in 20 minutes? Is it because this is either frowned upon or just straight up wrong? Does anyone have any suggestions about the right way to go with this? Thanks for reading people. Regards, James ;) -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--> C++>$ U+> L++> B-> P+> E?> W+++>$ N K W++ O M++>$ V- PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP t 5 X+ R- tv+ b+> DI D+++ G+ e(+++++) h--(++) r++ z++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

3 2

OT: procmail recipe question
by James Pifer 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

I'm trying to use procmail and I'm having trouble getting it to set some headers. I have one mailing list that sets Newsgroups: in the header and I want to remove it. I have the following test recipe: :0 * ^Subject:.*\<testing * ^(Mime-Version:|Content-) | formail -IMime-Version: -IContent- If I understand it correctly, it should remove the Mime-Verion and Content headers. The recipe gets matched but then doesn't deliver correctly: procmail: Match on "^Subject:.*\<testing" procmail: Match on "^(Mime-Version:|Content-)" procmail: Executing "formail,-IMime-Version:,-IContent-" procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=formail -IMime-Version: -IContent-" procmail: Notified comsat: "test@:/home/jep/formail -IMime-Version: -IContent-" >From jep(a)obrien-pifer.com Mon Feb 2 11:43:03 2009 Subject: testing Folder: formail -IMime-Version: -IContent- 1010 It looks like it's trying to put it in a folder starting with formail. I tried putting the mail file on the next line (/var/mail/test), which is the same way I do it on my kid's procmailrc's, but it seems to ignore it. Where does procmail get the LASTFOLDER thing from? Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? Thanks, James

2 2

boot problem with centos
by fabian dacunha 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Dear All, I have a Centos 5.2 server used as a squid proxy server for quite sometime and was workin fine after a power failure the system refused to boot i jus see the grub boot load screen n then hangs so using the space bar n with the arrow keys i selected my earlier kernel and it booted fine i think that the latest kernel file i have that isvmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5xen is corrupted. how could i restore it back will yum upgrade solve the problem appreciate ur help regards fabian -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

3 2

Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
by Les Mikesell 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Marking words: "used" to be best? Which is the best now then? APC is > apparantely not an option as they suck bigtime IMO, so what's? Powerware and > APC are the two biggest and most wellknown UPS-manufacturers I know of. APC does make a full line of units. Perhaps you aren't buying the right ones if they aren't serving you well. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss