Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Need GLIBCXX-3.4.9 for /usr/lib64/libstdc++
by Scott R. Ehrlich 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

I am trying to compile an application on a CentOS 5.0 64-bit machine that gives me the error: /usr/local/bin/myprog: /usr/lib64/libstdc++: version `GLIBXX.3.4.9' not found (required by /usr/local/bin/myprog) I have gcc 4.2.3. I've performed a yum install compat-* and glibc* What am I missing? Thanks. Scott

2 1

remote access info please
by Gary 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

Hi ya'll, I built a new CentOS 5.1 server for a client, housing a Lotus Notes / Domino server, and various other virtualized IBM software server guests, and soon will have to physically move that server to another distant location. My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high port, but I am sure just about any program will allow this to be manually configured. Thanks for your help and input. -- Regards, Gary

10 14

linux rescue on usb thumbdrive
by Jerry Geis 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

I believe the same issue I see with running "linux rescue" on a USB drive is the same issue I am having why the thumb drive wont boot. When installing I have to use expert mode I just cant install directly as the USB disk is not seen. What happens extra in expert mode? some delay somewhere??? When doing a linux rescue it looks for existing installations and finds none. This is because the USB disk is not yet ready. If I do "fdisk -l /dev/sda" from the shell given it is not there, wait a couple second do it again and NOW the fdisk -l /dev/sda shows the device... Its just like when you stick a USB disk in a working machine. takes a few second to be mount-able. So the big question is how do I get the USB disk to be recognized a FEW second later? The boot is happening tooo fast and I think and my USB disk is not yet ready. That is why it cant find my ext3 file system on the disk. I am so close to getting this thing running. Any suggestion/comments on what I am finding and how to get past it? Thanks guys. jerry

1 1

can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"
by Rudi Ahlers 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

Hi all I've just installed CentOS 5.1 x64, from the 1st CD (minimal installation) and then tried to install Apache, but keep on getting this error: [root@cacti ~]# yum install apache Loading "installonlyn" plugin Repository centosplus is listed more than once in the configuration Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do Some extra info: rpm -qa --qf="%{n}-%{v}-%{r}.%{arch}.rpm\n" '*yum*' yum-metadata-parser-1.0-8.fc6.x86_64.rpm yum-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.5.noarch.rpm yum-updatesd-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.5.noarch.rpm Doing a "yum upgrade", I got this: Dependency Installed: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5.noarch 0:1.3-1.2.el5.rf perl-Digest-SHA1.x86_64 0:2.11-1.2.1 Updated: lftp.x86_64 0:3.7.3-1.el5.rf mtr.x86_64 2:0.72-1.el5.rf rsync.x86_64 0:3.0.2-1.el5.rf syslinux.x86_64 0:3.63-1.el5.rf Complete! Does anyone know how to fix this? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff

4 5

YUM and installing older versions of software.
by James B. Byrne 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

How does one specify a particular version of a software package to yum to install? Is this even possible? What happens to superceded pacjkages in repos? Are they simple removed/discarded? yum install package-X.Y.Z-A.el5 ??? The reason I ask is if a yum update goes awry for some reason then how does one revert to the previous (working) version? I seem to recall that up2date had a feature whereby one could locally archive superseded packages and rollback to a previous version was required. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

4 3

struggling with simple webdav
by Craig White 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

Normally I use authzldap to authenticate LDAP users but in this case, I have a client that wants non-LDAP users to be able to use DAV. The twist is that there are several virtual hosts on this server and perhaps that is confusing things... anyway, my httpd.conf has... <Location /webdav> Dav On AllowOverride None Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AuthType Basic AuthName "DAV-ADV" AuthUserFile /var/www/html/passwd/user.passwd # require valid-user <Limit PUT POST DELETE PROPFIND PROPPATCH MKCOL COPY MOVE LOCK UNLOCK> Require user craig </Limit> </Location> and my user.passwd works because I can login fine. but when I try to save a file - say with OpenOffice to... http://www.example.com/webdav/test.odt I get this error (always)... Error saving the document Untitled1: The object cannot be created in http://www.example.com/webdav/. but the directory has suitable permissions I would think... # ls -ld webdav drwxrwsrwx 2 apache apache 4096 Jun 19 08:33 webdav so I changed the group on this folder... # chgrp users-all webdav # ls -ld webdav drwxrwsrwx 2 apache users-all 4096 Jun 19 08:33 webdav which craig is definitely a member of and still the same error... Anyone? Craig

1 0

New to Centos, and linux in general
by Michael 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

I've installed DSL linux -- no problem My expertise is in the HP3000 (non windows, non unix) environment. When I boot from Centos CD#1 I get a Panic error..... I'm thinking hardware is the issue so I try a different machine, same thing. I've tried 'linux rescue', 'linux mem=256' still the same error, which is mostly unreadable to me because most all the messages roll off the top of the screen. I am willing to buy new hardware, what hardware will just work right out of the box? Or are there other boot options? -- Michael Anderson, J3k Solutions Sr.Systems Programmer/Analyst 832.515.3868

3 2

question about expert install for 4.6
by Jerry Geis 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

At the boot: install prompt for 4.6 there is a i586 option. there is also an expert option. If you use expert mode can you also specify i586 somehow? Jerry

1 0

centos 5.1 install failure
by Monty Shinn 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

Greetings. I am attempting to install 5.1 x86_64, but it is dumping out during the post-install section. I was able to send a debug to a remote system. I've never looked through an install debug log before, but everything seems to be in order until after the "tar" install, at which point I get the following error: error: db4 error(-30977) from dbcursor->c_put: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery This db4 error runs until the system finally notices a crash. This box ran centos 4.x for over a year without a problem. Supermicro motherboard Intel 3.2 gig Xeon procs, x2 8 gigs memory 3ware 9550 12port SATA 3ware 8006 2 port SATA No other pci cards. I also ran memtest with no errors. It ran for approx. 15 hours. I tried to install with the 5.0 discs as well, but that install failed as well. I turned of ACPI in the bios after the second failure. This didn't help. I have been using the graphical install. I am about to try the text-based install. Any thoughts? Thanks, Monty

1 0

Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin
by ceejay cervantes 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

Thanks. ----- Original Message ---- From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 20:54:09 Subject: Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin ceejay cervantes wrote: > Hi, > > Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin. I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter any problems. I used priority=1 and protect=1 on base and updates (addons,extras protect=1 ; set no priorities) for the CentOS-Base repo and on the rpmforge repo I used protect=0 and did not set any priority. Should I enable only one (protect base or priorities) and not both? Thanks. > Just for the record, basically protectbase is priorities with only 2 settings (0 and 1) So, if you have both installed, protectbase will override the priorities. So, you should pick one or the other, but not both. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss