Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

OFF-TOPIC: Job opportunity in Augusta Georgia
by Jim Perrin 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

WAY Off topic here, but if anyone's in the Augusta, Georgia area and wants to work as a web developer(css, html, flash, php, photoshop and the other usual goodies), we've got a job opening. If you like abuse, long hours, low pay, and lots of stress, we have the perfect job for you. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell

5 5

system-config-cluster problem
by Doug Tucker 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

I have a 2 node cluster that has been running for a year, and is still up and working fine. However, a yum update at some point broke system-config-cluster and it cannot load the management tab anymore, because it *thinks* the node is not part of a cluster, yet, all of the definions are there and I can modify them and save, but cannot publish the changes to the cluster using the tool. Has anyone else experienced this problem, or know what may be wrong?

1 2

Linuxtag 2008 - call for meeting
by Ralph Angenendt 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

Linuxtag 2008 in Berlin is coming closer by the minute (May 28th to May 31st 2008) - and we are going to be there. And so can you - either as a visitor or with us at the booth we have there! See <http://www.linuxtag.org/> for more information about the event. To coordinate this event, there is going to be a "Meeting" in the IRC channel #centos-social on the freenode IRC network (<http://freenode.net/using_the_network.shtml> for more information). The meeting will take place on Sunday, March 4th 2008 at 22:00 CEST (that's 20:00 UTC). Just connect to irc.freenode.net with an IRC client and /join #centos-social then. So if you want to be part of Linuxtag 2008: Be there on sunday! Or at least drop us a mail. As this mail goes to centos-devel(a)centos.org *and* centos(a)centos.org, please make sure that you only answer to both lists when you are subscribed to both lists. Best thing would be if you could subscribe to centos-promo(a)centos.org and discuss matters there. See <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-promo> for subscribing via the web. Cheers, Danke, Thank you in advance, Grüße, Ralph

2 2

f/oss routing solution?
by Rogelio 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

I'm looking for an open source router solution, and someone from the list recently recommended zebra (www.zebra.org) I haven't yet identified all my needs, but I'm guessing that it will do all my routing needs for a, say, class C set of IP addresses, particularly if I ever have to do anything BGP-related. Anyone have any pointers before I delve in? Or possibly a recommendation for another open source routing solution? Yeah, I know about Cisco stuff, but I'm hoping to limp along on a shoestring budget until I get a few more things in place, then I'll rethink everything.

6 5

Re: [CentOS] DVD reader: Hardware problem or OS glitch?
by Lanny Marcus 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

On 29 April 2008, Alan Bartlett ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com wrote: > > 2008/4/29 William L. Maltby <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com>: > > > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 19:24 +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote: <snip> > > in >boxes #1 & #2 the drives behaves as you want, in box #3 the > drive >misbehaves. Have you tried the test of swapping the drives in - > say - boxes >#2 & #3 and seeing if the problem moves with the optical > drive or stays with >box, #3? OK. I am going to try to swap the DVD readers, between my box and my daughters box, tomorrow morning, and see if the problem goes with the DVD reader that is now in my daughters box, when I install it in my box, or, if it persists in her box, with the DVD reader I now have in my box. Also, our Desktop boxes all have GNOME and KDE installed on them. The problem is *not* limited to GNOME. KDE also sees the DVD media as blank, when the FC6 Install DVD is in the drive.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] DVD reader: Hardware problem or OS glitch?
by Lanny Marcus 29 Apr '08

29 Apr '08

On 29 April 2008, MHR mhullrich at gmail.com wrote: > > ______________________________________________________________________ > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Lanny Marcus <lannyma at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29 April 2008, MHR mhullrich at gmail.com wrote: > > > > >Can you access the contents of the DVD from a command line at all? If > > >so, have you tried doing the rpm install from the command line? > > > > Yes. I installed the kdeedu RPM awhile ago. Using the command line, I > > can mount and access the DVD, without any problem. > > > > Then it seems that your immediate problem, installing another rpm from > that DVD, is solved - use the command line. Mark: Yes. That rpm has been installed. :-) However, I would like to eliminate this problem. The main user of that box is 7 1/2 years old and I can't give her root access or expect her to know how to use the CLI. She has been using Linux boxes for several years, but with a GUI. > I am a firm believer in command line usage, so I'm really not at all > clear on what the importance of being able to access the DVD via > Nautilus is. Yes, it's an annoyance if you can't get at files that > way, but this is Linux - there are many ways to skin the cat, and you > have one that is arguably the best one available. > > That said, if you can access the disk from the command line, then this > is almost certainly not an OS problem but more likely a GNOME problem. > Have you tried asking on the GNOME list? No, and I believe that is a GOOD idea and I will post on the GNOME list and hope someone there has run into this and has a cure for this. Someone else here on the CentOS list replied to this thread, that he also has this problem, on an HP box. Also, I'm going to try Alan's idea and swap the DVD readers between the problematic box and my box and see if the problem moves with the DVD reader that is now in my daughters box, or, whether it is with that box itself. Thanks for the idea of posting on the GNOME list. I will do that! Lanny

1 0

Re: [CentOS] DVD reader: Hardware problem or OS glitch?
by Lanny Marcus 29 Apr '08

29 Apr '08

On 29 April 2008, Alan Bartlett ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com wrote: 2008/4/29 William L. Maltby <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com>: > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 19:24 +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote: > > 2008/4/29 Lanny Marcus <lannyma at gmail.com>: > > [root at dell1602 ~]# grep ^hdc /var/log/dmesg hdc: DV-516D, > > ATAPI > > CD/DVD-ROM drive hdc: ATAPI 50X DVD-ROM drive, 256kB Cache, > > UDMA(100) > > [root at dell1602 ~]# > > > > Good(-ish). The optical device is there but it's an old combo > > CD/DVD-ROM drive. > > > > > > > > >Then looked at the symbolic links? ls -l /dev/ | grep hdc > > > > > > [root at dell1602 ~]# ls -l /dev/ | grep hdc > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 29 12:30 cdrom-hdc -> > > hdc > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 29 12:30 dvd -> hdc > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 29 12:30 dvd-hdc -> > > hdc > > brw------- 1 lanny disk 22, 0 Apr 29 12:30 hdc > > [root at dell1602 ~]# > > When I do that, I get nothing. But, this is promising (BTW, my prev > ide-cd thingy was left over from another CentOS box. It's not effective > on this one.). > > ]# ls -l /dev|grep -i "dvd\|cd" > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 cdrom -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 cdrom-hda -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 cdrw -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 cdrw-hda -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 cdwriter -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 cdwriter-hda -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 dvd -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 dvd-hda -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 dvdrw -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 dvdrw-hda -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 dvdwriter -> hda > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 26 17:52 dvdwriter-hda -> > hda > > And > > # ls -Ll /dev|grep -i "dvd\|cd" > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 cdrom > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 cdrom-hda > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 cdrw > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 cdrw-hda > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 cdwriter > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 cdwriter-hda > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 dvd > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 dvd-hda > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 dvdrw > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 dvdrw-hda > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 dvdwriter > brw------- 1 wild-bill disk 3, 0 Apr 26 17:52 dvdwriter-hda > > I popped a CentOS DVD in, got one image on the desktop and one mount > listed from the mount command and one nautilus box popped up.. > > I removed that and inserted a Mark Knopfler DVD and totem automatically > popped up to do it's usual bitch about plugins. > > Mount showed one on /media/SHANGRILA and desktop had one ICON for it. >So what does grep ^hda /var/log/dmesg tell you about your optical drive >Bill? >Being a Unix user of 25 years, I'm always a little suspicious of these >new-fangled things like desktops. ;-) >However, if you're using Gnome then please have a look at System --> >Preferences --> Removable Drives and Media I will do that, ASAP. We have a neighbor using that box, at this time. >I know that there is a difference in the automount of a data CD/DVD when the >user is root (basically it doesn't, you would have to right-click on the >icon and select mount manually) and when the user is a normal user >(automount err automounts). >Lanny or Bill - Sorry I'm loosing track. One of you has three boxes; Lanny is the one with three boxes used as Desktops. We also have a headless router and a backup router. :-) > in >boxes #1 & #2 the drives behaves as you want, in box #3 the drive >misbehaves. Have you tried the test of swapping the drives in - say - boxes >#2 & #3 and seeing if the problem moves with the optical drive or stays with >box, #3? That would be a PITA, however, I will *probably* do it, someday when I'm in the house alone and can concentrate on the task. Good idea! >The hd{a|b|c|d}=ide-cd kludge certainly isn't required with the CentOS 5 >2.6.18-series kernels. I last came across it with a 2.4.8-* IIRC. Bill posted (above) that he had that left over from a prior installation. >Just a few more of my thoughts, for now. Greatly appreciated!

1 0

load level?
by Jason Pyeron 29 Apr '08

29 Apr '08

I have a server holding a 2.5-4.0 load level consistently, where should I start debugging it? top - 13:32:01 up 167 days, 5:45, 6 users, load average: 2.87, 1.83, 1.51 Tasks: 111 total, 1 running, 110 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.2% ni, 99.8% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 895728k total, 871996k used, 23732k free, 190612k buffers Swap: 1802232k total, 216k used, 1802016k free, 63776k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1 root 16 0 4756 556 460 S 0 0.1 0:35.34 init 2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:02.83 migration/0 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:27.27 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:05.03 migration/1 5 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:22.88 ksoftirqd/1 6 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:03.15 events/0 7 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:01.98 events/1 8 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper 9 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/0 10 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/1 11 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd 66 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:16.14 pdflush 67 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 2:30.44 kswapd0 68 root 15 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0 69 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/1 213 root 22 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod 450 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0 451 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/1 452 root 6 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ata_aux 456 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0 457 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_1 465 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_2 466 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_3 494 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 4:03.36 kjournald 542 root 16 0 24192 596 416 S 0 0.1 0:36.55 ypbind 595 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod 596 root 18 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 lockd 775 apache 15 0 185m 40m 3628 S 0 4.6 0:00.59 httpd 1832 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kedac 1904 root 16 0 10828 1072 856 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 pppd 1973 root 6 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kauditd 1998 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_4 1999 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 3:10.72 usb-storage 2176 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.01 kjournald 3070 root 15 0 3632 552 440 S 0 0.1 1:08.11 syslogd 3074 root 15 0 2540 372 296 S 0 0.0 0:00.04 klogd 3087 root 16 0 2552 300 200 S 0 0.0 0:30.06 irqbalance 3155 root 15 0 2916 488 256 S 0 0.1 0:00.97 smartd 3215 root 15 0 8716 776 612 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 xinetd 3293 root 16 0 40836 2672 984 S 0 0.3 1:07.23 sendmail 3303 smmsp 16 0 33504 2108 812 S 0 0.2 0:00.99 sendmail 3313 root 16 0 4180 324 244 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 gpm 3323 root 16 0 175m 35m 9064 S 0 4.0 0:13.24 httpd 3332 root 16 0 57092 976 560 S 0 0.1 0:50.01 crond 3353 xfs 16 0 10020 1472 756 S 0 0.2 0:00.17 xfs -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

8 12

Re: [CentOS] DVD reader: Hardware problem or OS glitch?
by Lanny Marcus 29 Apr '08

29 Apr '08

On 29 April 2008, Alan Bartlett ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com wrote <snip> > > ______________________________________________________________________ > 2008/4/29 Lanny Marcus <lannyma at gmail.com>: > > > [root at dell1602 ~]# grep ^hdc /var/log/dmesg > > hdc: DV-516D, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive > > hdc: ATAPI 50X DVD-ROM drive, 256kB Cache, UDMA(100) > > [root at dell1602 ~]# > > > Good(-ish). The optical device is there but it's an old combo CD/DVD-ROM > drive. > > > > >Then looked at the symbolic links? ls -l /dev/ | grep hdc > > > > [root at dell1602 ~]# ls -l /dev/ | grep hdc > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 29 12:30 cdrom-hdc -> hdc > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 29 12:30 dvd -> hdc > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 29 12:30 dvd-hdc -> hdc > > brw------- 1 lanny disk 22, 0 Apr 29 12:30 hdc > > [root at dell1602 ~]# > > > Good. That's o.k. also. > > > > > > I just updated the hal rpm on the box with the problem and I did a > > restart of the box after that. > > > > hald (pid 2069) is running... > > > Good, again. > > > > >I don't know if this will be any use - > > >http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/HAL > > > > Alan: I will check that out! Thanks much! Lanny > > > > > Did I see that you are still running a very out of date kernel? Of the > 2.6.18-8.m.n series? Any particular reason? We didn't have ADSL before and I have been selectively updating rpms. That box is now running kernel 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 :-) The problem still exists, after the kernel update, and as someone else suggested, I will probably post on the GNOME list for any ideas someone there might have. Neither of the GNOME modules mentioned in the TipsAndTricks/HAL article that you mentioned above are available for update: (a) gnome-volume-manager and (b) gnome-mount When I updated the kernel, I also updated hwdata and kudzu. If we knew what is causing this to happen, there could be a fix, but it remains a mystery. Thanks much! Lanny

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: Extra icons on desktop
by Ross S. W. Walker 29 Apr '08

29 Apr '08

Boot and root should be ok, but misc is probably causing problems with file managers querying fstab and hal. -Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org <centos-bounces(a)centos.org> To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> Sent: Mon Apr 28 18:30:00 2008 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: Extra icons on desktop On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Ross S. W. Walker <rwalker(a)medallion.com> wrote: > > tune2fs -L "" /dev/XXX > Thank you! mhr _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.

3 18

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss