Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

ivtv
by Jason Pyeron 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

I have this old memory that the kernels used are a hodge podge of backports etc. So for a kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.9.EL should I use 0.4.10? Quoted from http://ivtvdriver.org/index.php/Download: The latest stable releases can be found here. Currently this is version 0.4.10 for kernels <= 2.6.15, version 0.6.7 for kernel 2.6.16, version 0.7.4 for kernel 2.6.17, version 0.10.6 for kernels >= 2.6.18 and <= 2.6.21.x and version 1.0.3 for kernels >= 2.6.22 and <= 2.6.23. Ps, anyone have any sugestion about dkms and ivtv? Jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Sr. Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

3 3

Ghostview
by James A. Peltier 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

Does anyone know where I can find good ol' fashion gv? It seems the only ghostview is kghostview or evince. -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-3610 Fax : 778-782-3045 Mobile : 778-840-6434 E-Mail : jpeltier(a)cs.sfu.ca Website : http://gruvi.cs.sfu.ca | http://scirf.cs.sfu.ca MSN : subatomic_spam(a)hotmail.com

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 32, Issue 15
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 3 i386 seamonkey - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 seamonkey - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) seamonkey - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2007:0813 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 openssl - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2007:0813 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 openssl - security update (Tru Huynh) 6. CESA-2007:0813 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 openssl - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 7. CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) thunderbird - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 8. CESA-2007:0813 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) openssl - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 9. CESA-2007:0975 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) flac - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 10. CESA-2007:0975 Important CentOS 4 ia64 flac - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:27:36 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 3 i386 seamonkey - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20071022122736.GA29988(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0980 seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0980.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update seamonkey\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

Centos 5.0 Intel G33/P35 Chipset Support (Asus P5K-VM, P5KC)
by Michael Rock 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

So the update is not on any mirror or anywhere else besides Dave's site on DVD? In otherwords to fix this there is no choice but to reinstall from DVD or CD through his ISO? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

3 4

Centos 4.5 - HP Hardware monitoring
by Tom Brown 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

Hi We have up until now been a Dell shop but are looking at HP. I would normally monitor hardware by installing OMSA from dell and then using nagios as the monitor. Are there tools for HP that would allow me to do similar? thanks

4 4

(no subject)
by MBernha＠bart.gov 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

I am forwarding this exchange from the BIND 9 list (I posted the question) because it seems relevant. any comment on this? Is it for the North American Linux Distributor to fix, or is it something the CentOS folks can do? > When my 64-bit Centos5 machine boots up, I see the following messages: > process `rndc' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT process > `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT This is an unfortunate linuxism. The kernel people put this warning in, but left SO_BSDCOMPAT defined in their header files, so you can't get around it by using #ifdef SO_BSDCOMPAT. BIND 9 has a linux kernel version check that's supposed to prevent it from setting that socket option on kernels that don't need it... but I guess it doesn't work on CentOS5, I've no idea why not. The proper fix would be for the linux people to stop issuing this warning in production kernels. In the meantime, you can shut it up by editing lib/isc/unix/socket.c and changing the function clear_bsdcompat() so it always sets bsdcompat to ISC_FALSE.

1 0

restrict network access
by Arne Pelka 22 Oct '07

22 Oct '07

Hi, I have two pc using centos 4, these machines need only access to the (big, class b) local network. Because of security reasons the network access should be restricted to this local network - mainly the users of these pc should not be able to access webpages outside of the local network. My problem is, that I have no own centos repository and therefore these two pc need access to the centos mirrors to get updates. What would be the best way to restrict the network access to the local network and allow the access to some external addresses (a centos mirror and maybe some other servers/websites). I was thinking about iptables but I'm not very experienced in this questions - maybe there is an easier way. The configuration with iptables seems to be very complex, I was skimming through some tutorials and the man pages. In thanks and with best reagrds, Arne

4 5

how does one remove bond1?
by J. Potter 22 Oct '07

22 Oct '07

Hi List, We're using bonding to create bond0 with 2 NICs, and noticing that CentOS 5 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 (and presumably older) creates bond1 as well. I'd like to remove bond1 from the system, so that our monitoring scripts don't pick it up, except for those machines that actually do have a bond1. So... how does one remove bond1? Thanks! Misc info below of configuration and what doesn't work. best, Jeff % cat /etc/modprobe.conf | grep bond alias bond0 bonding options bond0 max_bonds=2 miimon=100 mode=1 % find /etc/ -iname "*bond1*" | wc -l 0 % grep -r bond1 /etc/ 2> /dev/null | wc -l 0 % cat /sys/class/net/bonding_masters bond0 bond1 % echo "bond0" > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters -bash: echo: write error: Operation not permitted % id uid=0(root) gid=0(root) ...

3 4

Monitoring through SNMP
by Centos 22 Oct '07

22 Oct '07

Hello I have dell servers and just want to install its MIBs so I can monitor them through snmpwalk. is copying MIBs to /usr/share/snmp/mibs enough ? all MIBS in /usr/share/snmp/mibs has .txt extensions. should change the extension as well ? Thanks

1 0

Software RAID: on same IDE port or on different ones?
by Kai Schaetzl 22 Oct '07

22 Oct '07

I have a general question on software RAID performance. If using two IDE disks on RAID 1: is there much of a difference performancewise if I put both on one IDE port as master and slave or should I better put them on seperate ports. I remember from olde days that it was recommended to put CD and hard disk on different ports to maximize the throughput between them and as RAID1 is theoretically writing to both disks at the same time I guess putting them on different ports might be an advantage. Is it one or is it negligible? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

2 6

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss