Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34753 discussions

stream 8 or stream 9 for new server
by Jon LaBadie 13 Feb '22

13 Feb '22

I'm replacing my ancient desktop home server (CentOS 7, email, dns, backup) with a new mini-server. I've been running stream 9 on the new toy for a couple of weeks and I find there are still a lot of incomplete or missing things. Enough to delay full implementation. Unless I do some workarounds or compile from source. On the other hand I've read there will be no migration path from stream 8 to stream 9. It will require a complete reinstall. Any guesses as to when the stream 9 repos (including epel) will be fairly complete? Just trying to decide whether to wait a bit or go with stream 8. Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie jcu(a)labadie.us

4 5

kernel e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1 Reset adapter unexpectedly
by Hooton, Gerard 13 Feb '22

13 Feb '22

The Ethernet interface stops working intermittently, once a day. I get the following message in /var/log/messages Feb 13 04:19:47 pc001 kernel: e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Reset adapter unexpectedly I ran the following command : ethtool -i eno1 driver: e1000e version: 4.18.0-365.el8.x86_64 firmware-version: 0.4-4 expansion-rom-version: bus-info: 0000:00:1f.6 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: yes supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: yes ======= lspci : 00:1f.6 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (11) I219-LM I have CentOS 8 Stream. -- Gerard Hooton.

2 1

CentOS Plus 8-stream support?
by Dan West 12 Feb '22

12 Feb '22

Are the centos-plus packages for 8-stream no longer supported? I noticed that all of the repositories have removed the packages, but I have not heard any announcement that said they were going away. For example: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/centosplus/x86_64/os/Packages/ <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/centosplus/x86_64/os/Packages/> http://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/centos/8-stream/centosplus/x86_64/os/Package… <http://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/centos/8-stream/centosplus/x86_64/os/Package…> http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/centos/8-stream/centosplus/x86_64/os/Packages/ <http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/centos/8-stream/centosplus/x86_64/os/Packages/> I first noticed this when running updates and received the following message: ``` Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'centosplus': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: No URLs in mirrorlist ``` The last mention of the centos-plus repos I can find in the mailing list was from November 18th and was just addressing the final release of CentOS 8: ``` Note that older content, obsoleted by newer versions of the same applications are trim'd off from repos like extras/ and centosplus/ ``` While CentOS 8 EOL’d at the end of December, my understanding is that CentOS 8-Stream will be supported until May 31st 2024. Does that include CentOS Plus for 8-Stream? I really just need CentOS Plus for the kernel-plus package for Wireguard support. The alternative would be to build it into kernel after each release myself, but that isn’t easily maintainable with multiple servers. Let me know if anyone has any insights. Thanks, Dan West

2 1

sdl not useable / are there any limits number of harddisks?
by Ralf Prengel 11 Feb '22

11 Feb '22

Hallo, I ve a system with disks sda to sdk runing as a nexus repo for docker an d kubernetes. Every repo-type has an own disk Everything is working fine. The problem: A new disk sdl can t be uses. fdisk doesn t recocnize the disk. Same problem using parted. The hardware (a vm) is ok because a) booting gparted from a iso gives me full acches b) while booting sdl is shown Centos 7 is in use. Thanks for hints Ralf

3 2

Any downside to mount -o noatime?
by Kenneth Porter 11 Feb '22

11 Feb '22

I'd like to reduce the wear-and-tear on my SSDs and eliminate the unnecessary metadata writes on my backup media that only slow down the backup process. So I want to add noatime to all my mounts. Is there any downside to this? At one time I remember atime being useful for tmpwatch, which removes files in /tmp that haven't been accessed in a week or two. But I can live without that feature.

5 12

Re: [CentOS] Any downside to mount -o noatime?
by Joshua Kramer 11 Feb '22

11 Feb '22

You may get just as much SSD "savings" by putting /var/log and /tmp into a RAM disk. I do this with all of my Raspberry Pi's, since SD cards burn through pretty quickly, and I have several that haven't had their SD cards replaced in a couple years. On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:10 PM Kenneth Porter <shiva(a)sewingwitch.com> wrote: > I'd like to reduce the wear-and-tear on my SSDs and eliminate the > unnecessary metadata writes on my backup media that only slow down the > backup process. So I want to add noatime to all my mounts. Is there any > downside to this? > > At one time I remember atime being useful for tmpwatch, which removes > files > in /tmp that haven't been accessed in a week or two. But I can live > without > that feature. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

1 0

[CentOS Stream 8] Update of IPA server broken - bind-dyndb-ldap needs to be rebuilt?
by Mathieu Baudier 10 Feb '22

10 Feb '22

Hello, We are testing an IPA/IDM infrastructure which is a mix of RHEL 8 and CentOS Stream 8 environments. The configuration has been completed since last summer, and it is working fine between updates. Currently, the CentOS Stream 8 IPA servers cannot upgrade. I put the whole error message below, but after analyzing a bit, it seems to be that the problem is between: bind-dyndb-ldap (for which there is no new update) and bind-libs-lite (for which a new update is available) $ sudo dnf upgrade bind-libs-lite* Error: Problem: problem with installed package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 The update bind-libs-lite (32:9.11.36-2) seems to offer: /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1115 while bind-dyndb-ldap (11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b) seems to still require precisely: /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1112 $ sudo dnf provides */libdns.so* ... bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 : Libraries for working with the DNS protocol Repo : @System Matched from: Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1112 Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1112.0.2 ... bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 : Libraries for working with the DNS protocol Repo : appstream Matched from: Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1115 Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1115.0.3 ... $ sudo dnf list bind-libs-lite bind-dyndb-ldap Installed Packages bind-dyndb-ldap.x86_64 11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b @appstream bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.11.26-6.el8 @appstream Available Packages bind-libs-lite.i686 32:9.11.36-2.el8 appstream bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.11.36-2.el8 appstream Please note that, of course, the module stream idm:DL1 is enabled: $ sudo dnf module list idm* CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream Name Stream Profiles Summary idm DL1 [e] adtrust, client, common [d], dns [i], server The Red Hat Enterprise Linux Identity Management system module idm client [d] common [d] RHEL IdM long term support client module Also, as can be expected, these updates are not yet available on the *RHEL 8* IPA servers: $ sudo dnf list bind-libs-lite bind-dyndb-ldap Updating Subscription Management repositories. Installed Packages bind-dyndb-ldap.x86_64 11.6-2.module+el8.4.0+9328+4ec4e316 @rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.11.26-6.el8 @rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms Available Packages bind-libs-lite.i686 32:9.11.26-6.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms So, is there any workaround, or should we simply wait for the IPA/IDM server DL1 module stream to be updated? (there are updates of the ipa packages which are pending there, juts not bind-dyndb-ldap) Also, should I rather send such reports of our CentOS Stream testing to another mailing-list? (devel?) Or book them into Red Hat's bugzilla? Thanks in advance for your comments! Mathieu ## Full error log when trying to update a CentOS Stream 8 IPA/IDM server $ sudo ipactl status Directory Service: RUNNING krb5kdc Service: RUNNING kadmin Service: RUNNING named Service: RUNNING httpd Service: RUNNING ipa-custodia Service: RUNNING ipa-otpd Service: RUNNING ipa-dnskeysyncd Service: RUNNING ipa: INFO: The ipactl command was successful $ sudo dnf upgrade --refresh CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream 13 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00 CentOS Stream 8 - BaseOS 26 kB/s | 3.9 kB 00:00 CentOS Stream 8 - Extras 15 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00 Error: Problem 1: package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1115()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 Problem 3: package ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch requires bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1115()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-libs-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 Problem 4: problem with installed package ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch - package ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch requires bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 requires bind-license = 32:9.11.26-6.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 requires bind-license = 32:9.11.26-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 requires bind-license = 32:9.11.26-4.el8_4, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and bind-license-32:9.11.26-3.el8.noarch - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and bind-license-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

3 4

Email Notification of updates which are available to be applied on CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)
by Kaushal Shriyan 09 Feb '22

09 Feb '22

Hi, I am running the below open source components on CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) 1. nginx service 2. mysql service 3. php framework 4. pph-fpm service 5. composer A Dependency Manager for PHP Is there a way to notify via email if there are any new security updates available for CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 along with the above open source components which are running? Currently, I am manually running the *yum -y update* command to update the OS along with the above open source components. I have tried for yum-updatesd - Update notifier daemon but it is not available for CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core). Thanks in advance. I look forward to hearing from you. More info:- https://linux.die.net/man/8/yum-updatesd Best Regards, Kaushal

5 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 202, Issue 3
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 09 Feb '22

09 Feb '22

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2022:0473 Important CentOS 7 aide Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 23:31:43 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2022:0473 Important CentOS 7 aide Security Update Message-ID: <20220208233143.GA28824(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2022:0473 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0473 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: e00e4e27e76a7ce874a947e6df6282be03c80787552e9101d00197dc467c0182 aide-0.15.1-13.el7_9.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 9a2c3381dea205aafa6593afa062b62b7659783b72f822cd20909cf80b4a524b aide-0.15.1-13.el7_9.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)libera.chat Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 202, Issue 3 ***********************************************

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 202, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 08 Feb '22

08 Feb '22

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2022:0442 Important CentOS 7 log4j Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 16:47:44 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2022:0442 Important CentOS 7 log4j Security Update Message-ID: <20220207164744.GA17797(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2022:0442 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0442 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 1b461b4e217ac5f51d8990aad583c7f189e73fd3220a54053124772b83c42eba log4j-1.2.17-18.el7_4.noarch.rpm e4950b148639895cb3ed78b8a00c0708abe4685bd380e0003ebeb947ea1edc42 log4j-javadoc-1.2.17-18.el7_4.noarch.rpm 7bbf77456d5e310210c4bd541fee70097c26568f34f44184c878e5874e2b57f1 log4j-manual-1.2.17-18.el7_4.noarch.rpm Source: c4224181672eede65a1b3d8f829c9ed475cade9b7234f58c03994f39459ca732 log4j-1.2.17-18.el7_4.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)libera.chat Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 202, Issue 2 ***********************************************

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss