Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

5 participants
34752 discussions

Yumex
by Paul Vandenberg 01 Jan '06

01 Jan '06

In case anybody is interested, I found a version of Yumex that will work with CentOS 4.2. It is from another RHEL clone, Scientific Linux. This is the URL. ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/42/i386/SL/RPMS/yumex-0.42-9… Cheers....Paul

1 0

noprobe boot option with askmethod and NFS install
by Jerry Geis 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

>insmod <module> should do it On 31/12/05, Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote: >/ />/ If you specify noprobe at boot can you then manually />/ specify to load the 8139too network module? If so how? />/ />/ Thanks, />/ />/ jerry I am trying to to boot with askmethod to do an nfs install I did the noprobe insmod 8139too and it did not load the network driver. Did I miss something? my command is "linux askmethod noprobe insmod 8139too" Thanks, Jerry /

1 0

noprobe boot option
by Jerry Geis 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

If you specify noprobe at boot can you then manually specify to load the 8139too network module? If so how? Thanks, jerry

2 1

RE: Intel Corporation 82573V Gigabit Ethernet Controller
by Gerald Waugh 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

> > Attempting to install CentOS on a new MSI MB (MS 9618), which > uses the subject controllers. > There are two controllers on the board, seems as though only > one can be used. > I have to manually init, using ifconfig eth0, to use it. > > I understand that the Ethernet controller drivers are not available. > Is there any news on this or a possible date when drivers > will be incorporated into the install. > > lspci reads; > 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573V Gigabit > Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 03) > 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573V Gigabit > Ethernet Controller (Copper) > > I find that on bootup the Intel boot loader indicates that > The Ethernet port is corrupted or not initalized, now I assume that > the boot loader is in the ROM, as it comes up early in the > boot process. > > Dmesg says; > ======================================================= > Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 6.0.54-k2-NAPI > Copyright (c) 1999-2004 Intel Corporation. > ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:03:00.0[A] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10 > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:03:00.0 to 64 > divert: allocating divert_blk for eth0 > e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection > ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:04:00.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:04:00.0 to 64 > e1000: 0000:04:00.0: e1000_probe: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid > e1000: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -5

4 4

audio and video streaming, equipment, and centos 4
by Robert Hanson 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

greetings... and a heartfelt happy upcoming new year to everyone! scenario: company wants to stream realtime audio and/or video streams of their meetings i have done "a decent amount" of research on the necessary server side software to integrate into centos. not sure i like all that i see though. since the company is on about a 1.5 meg circuit i would expect to hook the equipment into a small centos box at the church which would forward a single stream to a centos server i have at the pop and feed all the client streams from where the bandwidth is. that is, if i am understanding everything correctly. so i felt it best to check the wisdom of the list on those already doing this for the church or other private or commercial entities. may i enquire as to what you are using for the server software? and, may i ask what *specific* hardware for audio and video devices you are using to do this please? something reasonably affordable? any extra guidance or instructions i should be researching or studying to implement this? if you find this is too OT and you wish to reply off list i would be happy to post to the list at a later date the results of the research and implementation i thank you in advance and kind regards, - rh -- Robert Hanson - Abba Communications Computer & Internet Services (509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net

1 0

3ware error
by Denis Croombs 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

I am getting this error:- 3w-9xxx: scsi0: ERROR: (0x03:0x0104): SGL entry has illegal length:address=0x3744A000, length=0xFF, cmd=X. In dmesg it finds the controller OK:- 3ware 9000 Storage Controller device driver for Linux v2.26.02.001. ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:06.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 scsi0 : 3ware 9000 Storage Controller 3w-9xxx: scsi0: Found a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller at 0xf2000000, IRQ: 11. 3w-9xxx: scsi0: Firmware FE9X 2.06.00.009, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.051, Ports: 8. Using cfq io scheduler Vendor: AMCC Model: 9500S-8 DISK Rev: 2.06 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03 SCSI device sda: 781137920 512-byte hdwr sectors (399943 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back, no read (daft) sda: sda1 sda2 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Any clues ? It is a Centos 4.2 I386 system (fully updated) and it appears to be working with no problems except this error. (The controller has 6 x 80Gbyte 7200 SATA drives attached in raid 5 config) Thanks Denis

3 2

Missing GPG sigs on Centos 4.2 SRPMS
by Maciej Żenczykowski 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

Howdy folks, $ cd /opt/mirrors/centos/4.2 $ find -type f | grep "\.rpm" | while read i; do rpm -K "$i"; done | egrep -v ": $sha1$ dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK\$" centosplus/SRPMS/reiserfs-utils-3.6.19-2.1.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK extras/SRPMS/drbd-0.7.14-1.centos4.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK extras/SRPMS/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#db42a60e) updates/SRPMS/ethereal-0.10.13-1.EL4.1.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK The previous packages seem to lack gpg signatures (and ipvsadm seems to have a signature unlike all the other packages...) Cheers, MaZe.

3 3

RE: [CentOS] RPMS's rebuilt or upstream one's used
by Bowie Bailey 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > Quoting Jim Smith <jim_smith2006(a)yahoo.com>: > > > Ah yes something else i forgot about(which i build > > from upstream) was the fedora-rpm tools, which allow > > you to build rpm's as non-root. > > You don't need any additional tools to build RPMs as normal user. You just > need to create .rpmmacros file in your home directory. See below for an > example. You'll need to create ~/rpm/build and ~/rpm/tmp directories. When > you have those directories created and .rpmmacros file in place, you just > "rpm -ihv source.rpm" (as yourself, not as root) go to the > ~/rmp/pkgname-ver-rel directory and do "rpmbuild -options-here pkgname.spec". > > Example of ~/.rpmmacros file: > > %packager Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex(a)milivojevic.org> > > %_signature gpg > %_gpgbin /usr/bin/gpg > %_gpg_path /home/alex/.gnupg > %_gpg_name alex(a)milivojevic.org > > %_topdir /home/alex/rpm > %_tmppath %{_topdir}/tmp > %_builddir %{_topdir}/build > > %_rpmtopdir %{_topdir}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release} > %_sourcedir %{_rpmtopdir} > %_specdir %{_rpmtopdir} > %_rpmdir %{_topdir}/RPMS > %_srcrpmdir %{_topdir}/RPMS > %_rpmfilename %%{NAME}-%%{VERSION}-%%{RELEASE}.%%{ARCH}.rpm I just use this quick procedure: mkdir $HOME/rpm mkdir $HOME/rpm/SOURCES mkdir $HOME/rpm/SPECS mkdir $HOME/rpm/BUILD mkdir $HOME/rpm/SRPMS mkdir $HOME/rpm/RPMS mkdir $HOME/rpm/RPMS/i386 echo "%_topdir $HOME/rpm" >> $HOME/.rpmmacros -- Bowie

3 3

x window can't start. monitor out of range
by adrian kok 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

Hi all I change the monitor to LG LCD but x window couldn't start because of the "out of range" signal in the monitor How can I fix this problem Thank you

3 3

RPM conflicts - help!
by Benjamin Smith 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

I'm building a database/application server with a Dual-Opteron 64 bit system. I need to run PHP4, Apache, and Postgres 8.1, but I'm having conflicts with Postgres 8.1 and PHP 4 that comes with CentOS. History: 1) I installed Apache and PHP with yum. 2) I then installed PostgreSQL 8.1 RPMs from the PG website. 3) Then, I tried to install php-pgsql with yum - and it didn't work, complaining about pgsql.so.3. So, I installed with --nodeps and symlinked the /usr/lib64/libpq.so.4 -> /usr/lib64/libpq.so.3. Now, PHP and PGSQL work without any problems. But now, I can't do a yum update - it still complains about pgsql.so.3! What can I do to resolve this? Thanks, -Ben -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978

5 19

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss