Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

5 participants
34752 discussions

RPMS's rebuilt or upstream one's used
by Jim Smith 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

RPMS's rebuilt or upstream one's used Hi I got a cleanly reinstalled 4.2 workstation. However i still needed to build the following SRPMS from Mandriva/Fedora :- - Chkrootkit - Logcheck - Tripwire - Xboard & Gnuchess - Rkhunter I needed to use the upstream versions of :- - OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 - RealPlayer Gold - Acrobat Reader I needed to tweak Bind chroot to log queries and adopt a BSD style UID>1000. All redhat-based systems come with the inevitable tonne of services on by default. Is this the same situation with everyone else? I know Karanbir produces some home made rpm' but obviously not all of the above. Dag's repo is also cool but not as extensive as Fedora Extras. Are there any plans to provide goodies like - pup - yumex/yum utils now that Fedora has dropped Up2date? __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/

4 7

x86_64 box need to compile and link program for i386
by Jerry Geis 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

I have an x86_64 box. I have a program I need to compile with the 32 bit compiler and linker. Are there directions explaining how to do that somplace? Or can someone provide details. THanks, Jerry

2 1

yum vs rpm
by Bowie Bailey 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

If I have a local rpm file, what is the difference between running "rpm -i" and "yum localinstall"? When I do "rpm -i", I can still see the info via "yum info", so is there a difference? -- Bowie

3 2

Unknown CUPS Signature
by Darren Young 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

Updating a 3.6 installation and during the CUPS update I get: "The package cups-1.1.17-13.3.34 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue?" Said no for the moment. Safe to ignore this one? ------------------------------- Darren Young Senior UNIX Admin University of Chicago Graduate School of Business -------------------------------

2 1

weird problem with outgoing connections
by Roger D Vargas 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

After migrating to centos 4, Im having a weird connection problem with online games, Planeshift and Anarchy Online. Im using my own firewall script, that was working fine before installing Centos. I disabled default firewall. Can somebody give me an idea about whats happening? -- Roger D. Vargas http://dsgp.blogspot.com | Linux, programación, juegos ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es

4 4

cyrus idled not in the cyrus-imapd rpm?
by sophana 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

Hi I successfully installed cyrus + postfix on my centos 4.2 box. When trying to make imap idle working, I noticed that there is no idled executable in the rpm. Do I have to recompile cyrus from source to get idled working? Thanks

5 6

Kerberos and Winbind both needed for Active Directory??
by Doug Long 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

When configuring CentOS 4 to authenticate (for all things, such as ssh and samba shares) against Active Directory is it necessary to check both the Kerberos and Winbind options under "Authentication," or is Winbind alone sufficient (since winbind uses kerberos)? When I have attempted to get this working, I was only able to do it with both kerberos and winbind selected. The other problem I had was that I had to have a local account with the same username. I am sure it is something very small that I am missing, but I just can't figure it out. Any comments or suggestions are highly appreciated.

10 27

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 10, Issue 12
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA:2005-1229-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 libtool - bugfix update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA:2005-1229-1 CentOS 4 i386 libtool - bugfix update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:31:49 -0600 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA:2005-1229-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 libtool - bugfix update To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <1135873909.3574.130.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1224-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 libtool - Bugfix Update This CEBA fixes the following bug: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1156 The following files are uploaded and syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: libtool-1.5.6-4.EL4.1.c4.i386.rpm libtool-1.5.6-4.EL4.1.c4.x86_64.rpm libtool-libs-1.5.6-4.EL4.1.c4.x86_64.rpm src: libtool-1.5.6-4.EL4.1.c4.src.rpm

1 0

RE: [CentOS] Version download problem?
by Young, Darren 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

> The oldest kernel that we released with CentOS-3 was 2.4.21-9.0.1. That > was at 3.1 which was the oldest official release. I found an EL rpm for 2.4.21-4.0.1 on RHN, seems to be one of the first 3.x kernels, maybe even *the* first. > I can build you a 2.4.21-4.0.1 kernel ... and maybe even a 2.4.21-4.0.1 > install CD if you absolutely need that (I don't have a CentOS-3 build > environment for spinning CD though, I do CentOS-4) ... IF all (or most) > of the rest of the 3.1 level stuff would work. Many thanks for the offer, I can build a new one if necessary but I'm really trying to avoid it. I'm installing 3.6 into VMware right now to find out how picky the various IBM installers truly are. I do know some of them are 'pickier' than others. > BUT ... if you need all stuff before EL3 update 1, that would be fairly > hard. (In fact it would be building a whole new point release :) Yea, I'll just use "the other" EL if it comes down to that. I think WS will work for what I'm doing, it's just a reference build/environment and not production. It will be interesting to see if CentOS can in fact be used for Tivoli Storage Manager, not so much on the OS side, but if IBM's products actually detect the fact that it's not the "real thing". One thing I did find with their Integrated Solutions Console (ISC) was that it seems to read /etc/redhat-release to determine something... Wasn't paying attention to the system calls all that closely, but I did see open(), fseek() and close() on it.

2 1

Building PHP PECL modules
by Aleksandar Milivojevic 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

I'm attempting to build some PECL modules on fully updated CentOS 4.2 system. Preferably pack them into nice RPM packages. However, seems I'm missing something. For example, this is what I get for sqlite module: $ pear makerpm SQLite-1.0.3.tgz `phpize' failed The php-devel package is installed (so I do have phpize command). It's just that it is failing. If I unpack the files into directory, and do "pear build" or "pear install", I'm getting a bit more verbose error: $ pear build running: phpize configure.in:9: warning: underquoted definition of PHP_WITH_PHP_CONFIG run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal configure.in:32: warning: underquoted definition of PHP_EXT_BUILDDIR configure.in:33: warning: underquoted definition of PHP_EXT_DIR configure.in:34: warning: underquoted definition of PHP_EXT_SRCDIR configure.in:35: warning: underquoted definition of PHP_ALWAYS_SHARED acinclude.m4:19: warning: underquoted definition of PHP_PROG_RE2C configure.in:65: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. `phpize' failed I do remember being able to build and install couple of PECL modules some time ago on different CentOS 4.2 system. Howerver, I'm failing to see why the builds are now failing. The two systems look more or less the same (except hardware, the old one was i686, the new one is i586). I'm not an automake/autoconf expert, the above message looks to me more or less like names of Spanish vilages (in other words, I'm completely culeless here). While on the topic of PECL/PEAR, packaging PEAR modules into RPMs kinda works. The "pear makerpm" produces unusable spec files most of the time, but with a bit of editing of those spec files, I got my RPMs. Mostly documentation, "ugly" package names, and by default files get installed outside of PHP/Pear search path (easy to fix manually in spec file). Known bug in pear or am I doing something awfully wrong? Anyhow, any help would be geately appriciated.

4 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss