Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

5 participants
34752 discussions

iPod on Centos 4
by Jesse 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

I'm having trouble getting my iPod working under Centos 4. I was hoping someone else using their iPod with Centos 4 could shed some light on this. When I attach my iPod via USB, I get these messages: 19:36:44 brahma kernel: usb 1-8: new high speed USB device using address 2 19:36:45 brahma kernel: Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... 19:36:45 brahma kernel: scsi2 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices 19:37:35 brahma kernel: usb 1-8: reset high speed USB device using address 2 19:37:51 brahma kernel: scsi: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery: host 2 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 I had no problems getting my iPod to work under Centos 3 (2.4.x kernel), once I had recompiled without the EFI partition option. In this case I don't think EFI is a factor though, as the device isn't even making it to the partition scanning stage. I tried using just the slower uhci_hcd but got the same results. Then I tried using the latest FC3 kernel (2.6.11-1.35_FC3), and surprise, the iPod mounts (with ehci) without any problems. Obviously I'd prefer to run the RHEL/Centos kernel though, even if it requires a small patch. At least then I know what's changed.

2 6

ftp firewall/iptables
by Dave 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

I just installed CentOS4 on my main server. It runs proftpd and is not NATted.. When I did the install I said to allow FTP and HTTP. I can ftp from windows dos ftp client. In IE I get "Unable to build data connection: No route to host" ncftp I get.. Data connection timed out. Falling back to PORT instead of PASV mode. List failed. Wget and FireFox just time out. Anything I need to add to the firewall rules? This is all it has related to FTP. -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m state -m tcp --dport 21 --state NEW -j ACCEPT

5 5

Re: Evolution rpm for CentOS?
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

From: Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> > My guess is that the sales rep simply explained the above policy poorly. Yeah, I honestly think that too. Sales reps have a nasty habit of doing that, not realizing what harm they actually cause a company. As Scott Adams was always fond of illustrating ... "Marketing: 2 Drink Minimum" -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

Evolution rpm for CentOS?
by Adrian Coman 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

Hi, Is there a CentOS4 rpm for Evolution 2.2.2 (I think that's the latest) ? Thanks, Adrian

10 12

Re: [CentOS] Backup Server with rsync methods
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

From: "scott.list" <scott.list(a)mlec.net> > My real, main objective is to be able to get a config working on a > local machine for FTP, Postfix, Apache, etc. then quickly getting a > remote server up and running with those configs in a quick fashion. I > would like to have my configuration "portable" so to speak so I may > change providers on a whim if desired, and to do minimal configuration > on the remote server to quickly get it to the stage and setup of my > main, home box. Then you should maintain all configuration and other system-specific files under CVS. That way you know what may or may not need to be changed, possibly with a couple of sed commands after checkout. This is the greater detail of "configuration management" in general, and not really specific to any backup scheme. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

Backup Server with rsync methods
by scott 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

Hi guys: I'm about to migrate a sever to a managed server facility. I've alwau=ys used tape to backup my server, now that's not an option. I've read abut using rsync to do backups and have several scripts to do same. I believe rsync is a good solution. I am missing some important nuiances though... I would like to have essentially a "mirror" server at my facility ( call it "master") that I can backup to, and from, completely from the other server (call it "hosted"). Obviously I have to have at least different IP addresses on "master" and "hosted", but other than that, I'd like them to be mirrors of each other. I would like to do all my configs, setup, etc. at my leisure on "master", where I have hands on control, then when ready, have "hosted" setup with a basic Centos server install, then configure it to rsync to my "master" and update the entire thing (updates and all) to my "master". 1. Which files tdo I need to exclude to avoid IP address and hostname changes? 2. What caveats do I need to be aware of? Are there other files such as 'live" libraries that I cannot sync to? 3. The "master" server at my facility and their server may have different hard drive architecture (i.e. IDS and SCSI drives, different processor, etc.). As long as I use a generic Kernel (i.e. stock) that supposts the hardware on both, this shoudl not be a problem, right? 4. Am I missing something, is there a better way? Thanks, Scott

5 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 5, Issue 3
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 3 ia64 php - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 4 ia64 php - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 3 i386 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 4 i386 php - security update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 php - security update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) php - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:36:04 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)iki.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:564 Important CentOS 3 ia64 php - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050707203604.GA23950(a)core.upi.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:564 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-564.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/php-4.3.2-24.ent.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.2-24.ent.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.2-24.ent.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.2-24.ent.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.2-24.ent.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.2-24.ent.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.2-24.ent.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/

1 0

Dual booting centos 4.1 and Solaris 10 express build 15
by mohamed yusuf 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

I have been trying to multiboot centos 4.1 and the current solaris express build 15. I have two hard drive s, the first one ( hd0 ) devoted to CentOS 4.1 and windows xp (no problems). The second drive (hd1) for Solaris 10 only. I tried to boot solaris from CentOS grub and got the following error messages: Booting Solaris 10 root(hd1,0) Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0Xbf kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot Error 17: can not mount selected partition press any key to continue.... I googled for error 17 and found out that "the partition exists but grub failed to recognize Solaris partition". That is odd because I had no problems triple booting windows,CentOs 4.1 and opensolaris build 16 and I don't get it, there is no partition difference between opensolaris 10 and solaris express. or is there ? Please somebody explain to me. Here is menu.lst for centos grub # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd0,5) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/hda7 # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/hda default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,5)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS (2.6.9-11.106.unsupported) root (hd0,5) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-11.106.unsupported ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.9-11.106.unsupported.img title CentOS (2.6.9-11.EL) root (hd0,5) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-11.EL ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.9-11.EL.img title Solaris 10 root (hd1,0) kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive makeactive chainloader +1 title Windows xp rootnoverify (hd0,0) chainloader +1 Note: This is my first post and I have learned a lot from your forum since I moved from mandrake 3 months ago. Thanks alot guys __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

3 3

ftp daemon problem
by Jeff Lasman 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

New install of CentOS 4.1; our first try at the 4.x. On previous 3.x installs we've used proftpd. On this one we're using (trying to use is a better statement of what we're going through) the default daemon, /usr/sbin/vsftpd. But we don't get anywhere. <snip> ftp> passiv Passive mode off. ftp> put ~/xorg.conf.work local: /home/jlasman/xorg.conf.work remote: /home/jlasman/xorg.conf.work 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV. 553 Could not create file. </snip> and <snip> ftp> pass Passive mode on. ftp> put ~/xorg.conf.work local: /home/jlasman/xorg.conf.work remote: /home/jlasman/xorg.conf.work 227 Entering Passive Mode (65,58,240,217,174,30) ftp: connect: Connection timed out </snip> When we turn off our firewall (which allows passive under CentOS 3 on a 2.4 kernel) we don't get the connection timeout on passive transfers, but we still get the 533. Any ideas where we should go from here? Perhaps install proftpd? I'm willing to, but I shouldn't have to. Thanks. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services 1254 So Waterman Ave., Suite 50, San Bernardino, CA 92408 Our blists address used on lists is for list email only Phone +1 909 266-9209, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"

2 3

Re: [CentOS] ftp daemon problem
by Jeff Lasman 08 Jul '05

08 Jul '05

On Thursday 07 July 2005 12:36 pm, someone wrote offlist: > how is the user logging in -- what username? and what are the > ownerships and permissions on /home/jlasman/ ? The user on my local desktop is jlasman. /home/jlasman is myself as a local user on my desktop system. Which is Mandriva 2005 LE. But I don't think that should matter. The remote server (running CentOS 4.1) user is test, set up as a standard user with adduser and passwd. But I did change the the default shell to "nologin". However nologin IS listed in /etc/shells, so my understanding is it should work. The file I tried to transfer is: -rw-rw-r-- 1 jlasman jlasman 2505 Jun 27 15:34 xorg.conf.work The permissions for /home/jlasman are: drwxr-xr-x 33 jlasman jlasman 4096 Jul 6 22:07 /home/jlasman/ Any help appreciated. (Though I know you wrote me offlist, the questions are good and helpful and I can only hope you won't mind my responding onlist in an attempt to get as much help as possible.) Thanks in advance. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services 1254 So Waterman Ave., Suite 50, San Bernardino, CA 92408 Our blists address used on lists is for list email only Phone +1 909 266-9209, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss