Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34753 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Why EPOCH ?
by Petr "Qaxi" Klima 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

Hello Does anybody know why is there so much packages with EPOCH cca? What is it good for? Petr Klima

2 1

Re: [CentOS] problem with install of centos 3.4 on i386
by alte17-centos＠yahoo.fr 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

--- Martin Hamant <mh(a)accelance.fr> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:59:26 +0200 > Martin Hamant <mh(a)accelance.fr> disait: > > > > > [...] > > # md5sum CentOS-3.4-i386-disc1.iso > 8f87f5b9d0eda10e91b5c67cac985626 > CentOS-3.4-i386-disc1.iso > > > -- > Martin > i have the good md5sum on the iso file ! (i already tested that at home on the 3 CD) i'll test mounting the CD1's iso file this evening at home. i think it's just a burning problem ! it would be the first time it happens but ... with the bandwidth at work, there's nothing i can do ! thank you ! __________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

1 0

Re: [CentOS] problem with install of centos 3.4 on i386
by alte17-centos＠yahoo.fr 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

--- Martin Hamant <mh(a)accelance.fr> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:32:31 +0200 (CEST) > <alte17-centos(a)yahoo.fr> disait: > > > hello, > > > > let me explain my problem : > > i've downloaded centos 3.4 on i386 > > the md5sum of CD1's iso file is OK > > i burn it on a CD with NERO and i have this > problem in > > CD1 of centos 3.4 for i386 : > > > > ---------------------------- > > > > # file perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm > > perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: RPM v3 bin i386 > > perl-5.8.0-88.9 > > > > # rpm -qlp perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm > > erreur: perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: signature V3 > DSA: > > BAD, key ID 025e513b > > > > # rpm -qpi perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm > > erreur: perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: signature V3 > DSA: > > BAD, key ID 025e513b > > > > ------------------------- > > SO : > > > > do you see the same thing ??? > > is it a problem of Nero or CentOS ??? > > It seems the system you are issuing these commands > from doesn't has the > right GPG Key installed for these RPMs ? > > -- > Martin i found this problem because i had a problem with the install : the install fails and i have this message : "There was an error installing perl-5.8.0-88.9 This can indicate a media failure, lack of disk ..." i also tested if there was other problems : --- # for i in *.rpm; do rpm -qlp $i 1>/dev/null 2>&1 ; [ $? -ne 0 ] && echo $i; done perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm # --- so there is a problem only with perl ! and not with signatures. i give you here the md5sum of perl's package. can you tell me if you've got the same : --- # md5sum perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm e561c02bcba657378082f0a96c02e686 perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm --- __________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

2 2

problem with install of centos 3.4 on i386
by alte17-centos＠yahoo.fr 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

hello, let me explain my problem : i've downloaded centos 3.4 on i386 the md5sum of CD1's iso file is OK i burn it on a CD with NERO and i have this problem in CD1 of centos 3.4 for i386 : ---------------------------- # file perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: RPM v3 bin i386 perl-5.8.0-88.9 # rpm -qlp perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm erreur: perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: signature V3 DSA: BAD, key ID 025e513b # rpm -qpi perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm erreur: perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: signature V3 DSA: BAD, key ID 025e513b ------------------------- SO : do you see the same thing ??? is it a problem of Nero or CentOS ??? __________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

2 1

Apache and TCP Wrappers
by ryanag＠zoominternet.net 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

I'm trying to lock down Apache and SSH by using TCP Wrappers. I put /etc/hosts.allow to be httpd: IP#1 IP#2 127.0.0.1 sshd: IP#1 IP#2 127.0.0.1 and hosts.deny ALL: ALL This seems to work great for ssh, and not at all for httpd. Does anyone know why this would be? thanks

3 2

Automatic disk check
by centos.org_list＠000a.com 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

You know how if you do an improper shutdown and then boot up, the server prompts you to run a file system check if you press "Y" within 5 seconds? Well, this is great but sometimes not practical in remote access situations when we call our datacenter to say reboot a hang server and they have no monitor or keyboard hooked up to the system. Is there a way to have the system forced to automatically fo the filesystem check every time it boots up, if there's a need for it, ie: WITHOUT hitting "Y"? I couldn't find the answer to this one in docs or FAQs. If I missed it, a simple pointer to the source would be of great help. Thank you, Chris

6 8

OpenGroupware.org Tests
by Pedro Silva 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

After the initial question on this list about OGO and CentOS 4, here's what I've done. I installed CentOS 4 on a qemu image and setup a yum repo pointing to download.opengroupware.org/packages/fedora-core3/releases/ . I did this based on the assumption that FC3 packages work on RHEL4/CentOS4. yum install ogoall With this command, OGO user and database was created (Postgresql was detected and used), database structure was uploaded to pgsql. So far so good, http://localhost/OpenGroupware returns a 404. service httpd restart Same url, Apache Server Internal Error. Ok, what's wrong? system-config-services, the ogoall installation creates 4 new services, enables them as default but DOESN'T start them. Upon starting those 4 services, http://localhost/OpenGroupware worked sucessfully, straight to OGO Administration. I really didn't test it much, but, just by browsing some links on it, OGO seems to be working. Best regards, Pedro

1 0

Re: [CentOS] OpenGroupware.Org
by Dave Hornford 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

Pedro Silva wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm thinking on installing OGO on CentOS 4. I've been to > download.opengroupware.org but I didn't find any CentOS/RHEL 4 > specific rpm packages. I'm wondering, since RHEL4/CentOS4 is based on > Fedora Core 3, can I use these packages safely? Has anyone ever tried > installing OGO on CentOS 4? Has anyone ever used ogoall-...rpm ? Pedro, I have installed OGO on several different Linux versions as part of an evaulation. I would suggest starting with the Fedora RPMs available at: http://download.opengroupware.org/packages/fedora-core2/releases/ I have not looked at OGO since Dec/Jan, but the directions for installation are perhaps the worst I have ever seen. Hopelessly outdated & supersceded directions were prominenet and current directions buried away. By starting with the Fedora RPM you can be pretty confident you haven't missed something on the dge of the documentation. We ended up going with eGroupWare regards Dave www.HornfordAssociates.com

1 0

Re: [CentOS] simply question (NEVERMIND)
by Steven Vishoot 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

--- Steven Vishoot <sir_funzone(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > hello, > > i have a simple question that i can not figure out > because it is so simple i am over thinking it. but > my > ? is: > Difference between application processes and > operating > system processes? > > and no this is not a homework question? ;-), i am > just > making a simple question into a hard one for myself. > > thanks > > Steven > > > "On the side of the software box, in the 'System > Requirements' section, it said 'Requires Windows or > better'. So I installed Linux." > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second > dates. > http://personals.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > it is 3am and i should get to sleep before i become dangerous and stupid at the same time!!!!ugh sorry for the stupid post Steven "On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section, it said 'Requires Windows or better'. So I installed Linux." __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest

1 0

simply question
by Steven Vishoot 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

hello, i have a simple question that i can not figure out because it is so simple i am over thinking it. but my ? is: Difference between application processes and operating system processes? and no this is not a homework question? ;-), i am just making a simple question into a hard one for myself. thanks Steven "On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section, it said 'Requires Windows or better'. So I installed Linux." __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss