Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34732 discussions

help with xargs and mv
by James B. Byrne 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

I am trying to move a group of sendmail queue files into a special area and am developing s script to assist. The manual steps are: # Identify which messages to move mailq -qR<domain> > file1 # Select only lines with message ID strings grep '^[[:alpha:]][[:alnum:]]\{13\}' file1 > file2 # extract only the messages ID cut -b -14 file2 > file3 # prepend '*' to message IDs sed "s/^/\*/" file3 > file4 All of this works the way that I expect. What I now want to do is to mv all of the related files listed in file4 in the form "*messageid" to another directory. Using xargs I expected (naively) that the following construction would work: cat file4 | xargs mv /var/spool/mqueue/'{}' \ /var/spool/mqueue/offline (note that in the original this is all one line.) However, when I do this I get the error: mv: when moving multiple files, last argument must be a directory Try `mv --help' for more information. There is obviously something about xargs that I do not understand. In my imagination I see this xargs construction expanding to this: mv /var/spool/mqueue/*messageid1 /var/spool/mqueue/offline mv /var/spool/mqueue/*messageid2 /var/spool/mqueue/offline . . . mv /var/spool/mqueue/*messageidn /var/spool/mqueue/offline so that the qf and df files for each message are moved into the subdirectory offline. But this is obviously incorrect. Can anyone here point out to me what my misunderstanding is and how to get this to work? If this is not the forum for this kind of question then can someone with more experience point me to a mailing list that would be more suitable? Regards, JIm -- *** e-mail is not a secure channel *** mailto:byrnejb.<token>@harte-lyne.ca James B. Byrne Harte & Lyne Limited vox: +1 905 561 1241 9 Brockley Drive fax: +1 905 561 0757 Hamilton, Ontario <token> = hal Canada L8E 3C3

4 12

Apache 2.0.53 and Centos
by Michael Rock 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

Can someone tell me what configure options are needed to compile the latest Apache 2.0.53 to behave exactly like the latest apache 2.0.46 included with Centos 3.4? thx __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

4 10

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata: Updated mailman packages fix security vulnerability
by Tru Huynh 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-136.html refers updated files are :- updates/x86_64/RPMS/mailman-2.1.5-24.rhel3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/SRPMS/mailman-2.1.5-24.rhel3.src.rpm To update CentOS 3 to this new version run 'yum update mailman' CentOS 3.3 shipped with an earlier version of mailman - mailman-2.0.13-5 - in the extras repo. Details of the mailman upgrade procedure may be found at http://www.centos.org/mailman The 3.3 x86_64 updates repository already contained a mailman-2.1.5-23, so the upgrade was also provided for 3.3 and 3.4. Consider upgrading to CentOS 3.4 (http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=34) Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 x86_64 helper) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

CentOS-3 i386 errata: Updated mailman packages fix security vulnerability
by Lance Davis 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-136.html refers updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/mailman-2.1.5-24.rhel3.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/mailman-2.1.5-24.rhel3.src.rpm To update CentOS 3.4 to this new version run 'yum update mailman' CentOS 3.3 shipped with an earlier version of mailman - mailman-2.0.13-5 - in the extras repo. This version has not been supported since 3.4 was released, ( http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=34) however this version may be vulnerable to the exploit so it is recommended that all users upgrade. Details of the upgrade procedure may be found at http://www.centos.org/mailman Lance

2 1

silly cross posts
by Rick Graves 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

Russ, > Sorry for the cross post, but this is an important > one potentially affecting all recipients. Why be sorry? Did you break a rule? Where is the rule? It seems that there is a rule, but the rule gives if the matter is important enough. But you have to say "Sorry"? It seems that when a matter comes up that is important enough to inform everyone, one MUST cross post -- otherwise, you guarantee that lots of people will not get the message. Having to say "Sorry" to get a message out to everyone who needs to get the message seems silly to me. I would think that if the message is important enough and must get to everyone, one should be able to cross post without having to say "Sorry" -- saying "Sorry" is "silly". Rick

1 0

Mailman crons
by Henk van Lingen 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

Hi, The last RHEL3 update pack contains a mailman package. I'm using that on a new mailserver and found a little problem with cron when starting/ stopping the mailman service. RedHat moves the mailman crontab in and out every time, however, crond only notes the 'move in', not the 'move out. This is because the /etc/cron.d/ timestamp only changes by a 'move in'. My fix: add rm -f $DST_CRON_SCRIPT as the first line in the function RemoveCron() in /etc/init.d/mailman. Cheers, -- Henk van Lingen, Systems & Network Administrator (o- -+ Dept. of Computer Science, Utrecht University. /\ | phone: +31-30-2535278 v_/_ http://henk.vanlingen.net/ http://www.tuxtown.net/netiquette/

1 0

[centos 3.4] e1000 and installation problem
by Martin Hamant 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

Hello, I install Centos'es from PXE, with vmlinuz and initrd provided by images/pxeboot from the first CD of centos 3.4. The server is a PowerEdge 1850 with two integrated e1000 nic interfaces. So kernel is booting, then it comes to the screen which ask for one nic to do a dhcp query. I choose eth0, dhcp server reply well and then i get an ip address, dns'es, etc. And nothing else happen because the nic link is going down at this point !!! (no light, no way. ) I've tried with PXE install of centos 3.3, and all is working fine on this server.... Do you think there is a problem with the centos 3.4 "installation time" kernel ? I remember that centos 3.1 had problems about this nic too ... Any ideas ? Thank you ! -- Martin

3 5

full-d] Administrivia: List Compromised due to Mailman Vulnerability (fwd)
by R P Herrold 09 Feb '05

09 Feb '05

Sorry for the cross post, but this is an important one potentially affecting all recipients. This just crossed the Full Disclosure mailman moderated mailing list. It bears a careful read, and thought about whether a response is needed. The implication is that if there is any use of a mailman password in common with a password you 'care' about, you need to take appropriate action at once. Also some backends merge Bugzilla and mailman password stores, which can cause unexpected secondary effects. I have not seen a patch yet, and so one has to assume that the configs and passwords for all mailman moderated mailing lists are compromised. Once a fix issues, Mailman moderators will want to do a global password change, and local list modification. -- Russ Herrold ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:15:02 +0000 From: John Cartwright <johnc(a)grok.org.uk> To: full-disclosure(a)lists.netsys.com Subject: full-d] Administrivia: List Compromised due to Mailman Vulnerability Hi On 7th February 2005 I was notified of a number of potentially - compromised Full-Disclosure subscriber accounts. Following an investigation it appears that the Mailman configuration database was obtained from lists.netsys.com on 2nd January 2005 using a remote directory traversal exploit for a previously unpublished vulnerability in Mailman 2.1.5. Subscriber addresses and passwords have been compromised. All list members are advised to change their password immediately. There do not appear to be further signs of intrusion although investigations continue. The vulnerability lies in the Mailman/Cgi/private.py file: def true_path(path): "Ensure that the path is safe by removing .." path = path.replace('../', '') path = path.replace('./', '') return path[1:] A crafted URL fragment of the form ".../....///" will pass through the above function and return as "../", thus allowing directory traversal to occur using the following URL syntax to retrieve an arbitrary path. /mailman/private/<list>/<path>?username=<username>&password=<password> Expect vendor advisories nearer the end of the week, for now here is a suggested fix from Barry Warsaw: SLASH = '/' def true_path(path): "Ensure that the path is safe by removing .." parts = [x for x in path.split(SLASH) if x not in ('.', '..')] return SLASH.join(parts)[1:] This issue only affects Mailman installations running on web servers that don't strip extraneous slashes from URLs, such as Apache 1.3.x. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2005-0202 to this mailman issue. Cheers - John _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

4 6

Re: [Centos] help with xargs and mv
by James B. Byrne 09 Feb '05

09 Feb '05

Just a note that I caught and corrected the syntax error on my last example and that correcting it does not change the result at all. # cat workmv | xargs -i '{}' mv --Target-Directory=./mqueue/offline/ ./mqueue/'{}' vice # cat workmv | xargs -i '{}' --Target-Directory=./mqueue/offline/ mv ./mqueue/'{}' both give xargs: {}: No such file or directory Regards, Jim -- *** e-mail is not a secure channel *** mailto:byrnejb.<token>@harte-lyne.ca James B. Byrne Harte & Lyne Limited vox: +1 905 561 1241 9 Brockley Drive fax: +1 905 561 0757 Hamilton, Ontario <token> = hal Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

RE: CentOS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13
by Melinda Odom 09 Feb '05

09 Feb '05

>>> I have ecommerce stores on my server who use the same instantssl certificate without any problems. These particular certificates were migrated over from one plesk system to my new server with centOS 3.4 and plesk 7.5.1 reloaded. >>> We got it working. It was a custom config problem for that one site. Sincerely, Melinda Odom www.designhosting.biz 479-471-0891 -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-bounces@caosity.org]On Behalf Of centos-request(a)caosity.org Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:00 AM To: centos(a)caosity.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13 Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos(a)caosity.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-request(a)caosity.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-owner(a)caosity.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: CentOS 3.4 on Compaq Proliant (Troy Engel) 2. ssl certificate problem - one domain only (Melinda Odom) 3. CentOS-3 x86_64 errata : Updated Perl packages fix security issues (Tru Huynh) 4. Re: ssl certificate problem - one domain only (John Hinton) 5. Re: Samba print queues showing old jobs (Gavin Carr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:00:02 -0800 From: Troy Engel <tengel(a)fluid.com> Subject: Re: [Centos] CentOS 3.4 on Compaq Proliant To: CentOS discussion and information list <centos(a)caosity.org> Message-ID: <42094472.2060106(a)fluid.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed John Hinton wrote: > >> I am trying to install CentOS 3.4 on a Compaq Proliant 1600, and it >> hangs on probing monitor type when anaconda starts. I have tried >> > Do the install using the nousb flag. I have had the same issue on some > 1850s and had to disable the onboard scsi port allowing only the scsi > card to be enabled. Same same -- on the random old Compaq....DL360(?) (long since dead) it physically had no USB on the motherboard, and it took forever to figure out the 'nousb' flag to make any Redhat installs work. -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:05:14 -0600 From: "Melinda Odom" <info(a)designhosting.biz> Subject: [Centos] ssl certificate problem - one domain only To: <centos(a)caosity.org> Message-ID: <OHEMIKFDMHLDNJAPNOLEGEHKFGAA.info(a)designhosting.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I have ecommerce stores on my server who use the same instantssl certificate without any problems. These particular certificates were migrated over from one plesk system to my new server with centOS 3.4 and plesk 7.5.1 reloaded. When I generated a new csr for a new client on my centOS server and chose apache mod_ssl at instantssl for the csr I got the certificate, installed it (first new install on my new server) and now when someone goes to this particular ecommerce site and tries to purchase anything or create an account a box pops up asking if they want to open or download the file. This has never happened before and does not happen on all the certificates I migrated over to the new server without generating a csr. I am very confused as to what is happening. When I turn the ssl off for this particular ecommerce store everything works and customers can buy and register. My other sites that were migrated over to this new server do not have any problems and are using instantssl also. I called instantssl.com and they told me it was a problem with the mime types and the server was configured incorrectly and to look in the httpd.conf file. I see these for the httpd.conf file: /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf.save_by_frontpage I see this one is turned off in the httpd.conf file: LoadModule env_module modules/mod_env.so #LoadModule mime_magic_module modules/mod_mime_magic.so LoadModule cern_meta_module modules/mod_cern_meta.so Other ones: # TypesConfig describes where the mime.types file (or equivalent) is # to be found. # TypesConfig /etc/mime.types DefaultType text/plain Is there something that needs to be changed to make this ssl certificate work? Sincerely, Melinda Odom www.designhosting.biz 479-471-0891 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 2/7/2005

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss