Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34748 discussions

Centos 4
by Green 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

For your imformation, Many updaters were publicly released by RH as Source RPMs, and now vailable from: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (v. 4) General Advisories" https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html Regards.

2 1

Re: Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content
by Green 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:55:10 -0200, Lauro L. A. Whately <whately at lcp.coppe.ufrj.br> wrote: > > shouldn't CentOS be a temporary step to cAos ? > Not for me. Not for lots of people. ------------------------------------------------ Hello, Well, I think so , too. If CentOS changes its release policy, I might use a completely different Linux distribution like Debian. A existance of a clone of a so-called prominent linux distribution vendor is very important, I think. Regards.

1 0

Re: [Centos] no kernel upgrade on 3.3
by Matt Bottrell 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

Dave, Is there a new kernel available for the X64 platform? Can you see this in the repo? It might explain why it hasn't upgraded. The i386 may have been the only updated kernel... On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:12:19 -0600 (CST), Dave Augustus <davea(a)ingraftedsoftware.com> wrote: > > I did- they are exactly the same: > > [main] > cachedir=/var/cache/yum > debuglevel=2 > logfile=/var/log/yum.log > pkgpolicy=newest > distroverpkg=redhat-release > installonlypkgs=kernel kernel-smp kernel-hugemem kernel-enterprise > kernel-debug kernel-unsupported kernel-smp-unsupported > kernel-hugemem-unsupported > tolerant=1 > exactarch=1 > > [base] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Base > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/os/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #released updates > [update] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/updates/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #packages used/produced in the build but not released > [addons] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Addons > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/addons/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #additional packages that may be useful > [extras] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Extras > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/extras/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #packages in testing > #[testing] > #name=CentOS-$releasever - Testing > #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/testing/$basearch/ > #gpgcheck=1 > > [dag] > name=Dag RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux > baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el3/en/i386/dag > > Matt Bottrell said: > > Review your /etc/yum.conf > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:46:51 -0600 (CST), Dave Augustus > > <davea(a)ingraftedsoftware.com> wrote: > >> I have 2 servers: > >> > >> On both, I did yum update. > >> > >> One upgraded the kernel, the other didn't. > >> > >> Why? > >> > >> TIA, > >> Dave Augustus > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CentOS mailing list > >> CentOS(a)caosity.org > >> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

2 1

Re: [Centos] no kernel upgrade on 3.3- more info
by Matt Bottrell 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

Based on that.. they are different architectures.... Is there a new kernel for both architectures? On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:02:24 -0600 (CST), Dave Augustus <davea(a)ingraftedsoftware.com> wrote: > > one machine is a Dual P3 with 2G Ram > one machine is a AMD64 with 1G Ram > > Both are base installs of Centos 3.3 > > Dave Augustus said: > > I have 2 servers: > > > > On both, I did yum update. > > > > One upgraded the kernel, the other didn't. > > > > Why? > > > > TIA, > > Dave Augustus > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

2 1

Poll: what features are you lusting for in v4
by Troy Engel 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

While we're waiting on the keebler elves to make the new CentOS 4, what feature(s) are you most lusting after in RHEL/CentOS 4? For me: - official Mysql 4!!! (man does this make me happy) - official Subversion ..are my top two, they will make me a happy camper for so many projects. :) Sure sure the 2.6 kernel is nice, but that super-patched 2.4 kernel on v3 seems to work quite well too... -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

6 7

ProFTP -> vsFTP Configuration Options
by Forrest Samuels 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

I am moving from a server from running Red Hat 7.2 (with ProFTP) to Centos 3 (with vsFTP). There is a setting in ProFTP that lets me set the default ftp login directory for a specific user and I would like to do the same with vsFTP. The reason being is I have a 'webadmin' user that I use for uploading web content. I am thinking I could make the home directory of the webadmin /var/www in the /etc/passwd file but I would rather it just be for FTP and leave the login home as /home/webadmin. In ProFTP this was set in /etc/proftpd.conf like so: DefaultRoot / webadmin DefaultChdir /var/www webadmin Does anyone know how I can do that? I would like the settings for the other users to work as they are now. I have been looking at chroot_list_enable, and chroot_list_file files but I don't think that is quite what I am looking for (They are both commented out by default). I may be wrong. Thank you for any help! -Forrest

2 1

Badly posted "Oracle 9i, 10g, Apps 11.5.9" message.
by Stokely Boast 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Sudev Barar wrote: > This is OT but since you just joined the list do not hijack a thread. > Start a new message and not just change subject line after hitting reply > button. Your message showed up in middle of md0/fstab thread!! Yup, I've already been chastised for this once on the list (did you miss that post?) and I apologized privately via e-mail to the person who pointed out my mistake. I guess that's not enough, so, for you, and everyone else: I'm sorry. It won't happen again. BTW, thanks for the feedback I did get on 9i and 10g installations on CentOS. Are there any Apps 11.5.x lurkers out there, or has nobody actually tried this? I intend to at least attempt it and will post an update (in a _new_ thread) with my findings. This response should be in a new thread unless I really do have my head up my ass. Thanks, Stokely Boast

2 1

upgrade FC3 -> CentOS-4.0-Beta
by Terrel Shumway 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

I have two boxes I want to upgrade hedwig is in a DC in Texas so I have no physical access. installed RHEL-3.1 adhoc upgrades with WBEL-3.1 packages (before I discovered yum and apt-rpm) dist upgrade to FC2 using apt-rpm rock-sand is a local development box installed FC3 on one partition installed FC2 on one partition I want to get both machines running CentOS 4.0 rock-sand is my practice machine, so I want to pretend I don't have physical access. In CentOS-3.4-Server.iso there is a pkgorder.txt with a list of the packages in (I assume) the order they should be upgraded. But there is no such file in the CentOS-4.0 distribution. Should I just use the same order but with the new version numbers? What issuses has anyone had with the move to udev?

1 0

Garbled threads.
by Lamar Owen 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Hey, guys, when you are posting a new topic, can you please not use the 'reply; erase subject and message; compose new message; send routine?' Open compose for a new message and paste in centos(a)caosity.org (or, like I do, click on the address in my mail window). Makes it tough on those of us who read in a threaded fashion (I use Kmail myself). -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu

1 0

RE: [Centos] samba joining an ads domain
by Marc Powell 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-bounces@caosity.org] On > Behalf Of Marcello Mezzanotti > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:23 PM > To: centos(a)caosity.org > Subject: [Centos] samba joining an ads domain > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, i just installed CentOS 3.4, im trying to join this machine on > Windows 2000 AD, i did some confs on krb5.conf (REALM CONF) and > smb.conf > > kinit Administrator(a)DOMAIN.COM goes fine but net ads join -U > Administrator give me this: > > [root@sol etc]# net ads join -U Administrator Administrator's > password: > [2005/02/15 17:28:32, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(186) > ads_connect: No credentials found with supported encryption types > [root@sol etc]# > > whats wrong?? Funny, I was _just_ working on this. There are two issues that I encountered, the first being the one above and Google helped to resolve both. To correct your immediate issue, add default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc to the [libdefaults] section of /etc/krb5.conf Additionally, to get ssh access working I needed to disable the use of privileged separation for sshd. The problem in my case is that pam_mkhomedir.so needs root access to create the home directories if they don't exist. The way I've done it makes sshd a little less secure so I'm open to other suggestions... /etc/ssh/sshd_config -- UsePrivilegeSeparation no The information in my log files before the change was -- /var/log/secure Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd[7990]: Accepted password for [username] from [host] port 32781 ssh2 Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd[7992]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]: Permission denied And /var/log/messages Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd(pam_unix)[7990]: check pass; user unknown Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd(pam_unix)[7990]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=[host] Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 pam_winbind[7990]: user '[username]' granted access Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd(pam_unix)[7992]: session opened for user [username] by (uid=10327) -- Marc

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss