Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34732 discussions

Re: [Centos] Re: LinuxWorld Expo Update
by T'Krin 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

Francois Caen <frcaen(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:01:40 -0500, Matt Shields <mattboston(a)gmail.com> >wrote: >> So while at the show a lot of people were talking about the >> whole RH thing, and quite a few people that it was pretty funny that I >> was wearing a red hat. It wasn't planned, but it was pretty funny :-> > ><TONGUE_IN_CHEEK> > >Mr. Shields, > >We represent Red Hat, Inc. ("Red Hat") with respect to its >intellectual property matters. As you are aware, our client is the >owner of rights for numerous trademarks, including but not limited to >its famous RED HAT mark and RHEL (collectively, the "RED HAT marks"). > >While we appreciate that you may have taken some initial steps to >disassociate your company and products from Red Hat, the fact remains >that you have been seen wearing a red ballcap. > >We trust you will understand our client's interest in protecting its >valuable intellectual property and will start wearing blue, black, or >green ballcaps, or no ballcaps at all. > >Sincerely, > >(Signed by Red Hat Counsel ) > ></TONGUE_IN_CHEEK> LOLOLOL!!!

1 0

LinuxWorld Expo Update
by Matt Shields 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

Well, the first day was interesting. We a variety of questions from why do we do this, what's going on with RH, how come this is the first I've heard of you. And hundreds more. The good thing is that we've recieve a very positive response from everyone that visited our booth. Such a positive response that all our CentOS CD's are gone, and most of the cAos CD's are gone, and I've only got a few CentOS DVD's left. So if anyone can magically make 500 or 600 CentOS CD's magically appear, that would be great. :-> Anyway, I'll try to keep everyone posted during the day. Time to go back to the convention center. -- Matt Shields http://masnetworks.biz http://sexydates4u.com http://shieldslinux.com http://shieldsmedia.com (currently under construction) http://shieldsproductions.com (currently under construction)

4 4

Re: [Centos] Re: LinuxWorld Expo Update
by Scott Lewis 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

1 0

GRUB Bootloader
by Ulrik S. Kofod 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

I installed CentOS 4 Beta on an ATA disk to have a look at it, and on the same computer I have a Windows installation on a SATA disk. In the CentOS installation process it could see the operatingsystem on the SATA and everything looked good, it said something like "Other... /dev/sda" (not quite sure, it looked right so I didn't really take note of it). Now when I want to boot the windows installation is is attempting to boot from /dev/hdd, and that disk isn't even there? I had CentOS 3 on the ATA disk before and there it did the same thing, it's not a big problem as I just have to hit Esc and select the SATA before it starts booting, but shouldn't this be corrected somewhere? brgds Ulrik -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.

2 1

Centos 4
by Green 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

For your imformation, Many updaters were publicly released by RH as Source RPMs, and now vailable from: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (v. 4) General Advisories" https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html Regards.

2 1

Re: Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content
by Green 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:55:10 -0200, Lauro L. A. Whately <whately at lcp.coppe.ufrj.br> wrote: > > shouldn't CentOS be a temporary step to cAos ? > Not for me. Not for lots of people. ------------------------------------------------ Hello, Well, I think so , too. If CentOS changes its release policy, I might use a completely different Linux distribution like Debian. A existance of a clone of a so-called prominent linux distribution vendor is very important, I think. Regards.

1 0

Re: [Centos] no kernel upgrade on 3.3
by Matt Bottrell 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

Dave, Is there a new kernel available for the X64 platform? Can you see this in the repo? It might explain why it hasn't upgraded. The i386 may have been the only updated kernel... On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:12:19 -0600 (CST), Dave Augustus <davea(a)ingraftedsoftware.com> wrote: > > I did- they are exactly the same: > > [main] > cachedir=/var/cache/yum > debuglevel=2 > logfile=/var/log/yum.log > pkgpolicy=newest > distroverpkg=redhat-release > installonlypkgs=kernel kernel-smp kernel-hugemem kernel-enterprise > kernel-debug kernel-unsupported kernel-smp-unsupported > kernel-hugemem-unsupported > tolerant=1 > exactarch=1 > > [base] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Base > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/os/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #released updates > [update] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/updates/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #packages used/produced in the build but not released > [addons] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Addons > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/addons/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #additional packages that may be useful > [extras] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Extras > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/extras/$basearch/ > gpgcheck=1 > > #packages in testing > #[testing] > #name=CentOS-$releasever - Testing > #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/$releasever/testing/$basearch/ > #gpgcheck=1 > > [dag] > name=Dag RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux > baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el3/en/i386/dag > > Matt Bottrell said: > > Review your /etc/yum.conf > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:46:51 -0600 (CST), Dave Augustus > > <davea(a)ingraftedsoftware.com> wrote: > >> I have 2 servers: > >> > >> On both, I did yum update. > >> > >> One upgraded the kernel, the other didn't. > >> > >> Why? > >> > >> TIA, > >> Dave Augustus > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CentOS mailing list > >> CentOS(a)caosity.org > >> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

2 1

Re: [Centos] no kernel upgrade on 3.3- more info
by Matt Bottrell 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

Based on that.. they are different architectures.... Is there a new kernel for both architectures? On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:02:24 -0600 (CST), Dave Augustus <davea(a)ingraftedsoftware.com> wrote: > > one machine is a Dual P3 with 2G Ram > one machine is a AMD64 with 1G Ram > > Both are base installs of Centos 3.3 > > Dave Augustus said: > > I have 2 servers: > > > > On both, I did yum update. > > > > One upgraded the kernel, the other didn't. > > > > Why? > > > > TIA, > > Dave Augustus > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

2 1

Poll: what features are you lusting for in v4
by Troy Engel 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

While we're waiting on the keebler elves to make the new CentOS 4, what feature(s) are you most lusting after in RHEL/CentOS 4? For me: - official Mysql 4!!! (man does this make me happy) - official Subversion ..are my top two, they will make me a happy camper for so many projects. :) Sure sure the 2.6 kernel is nice, but that super-patched 2.4 kernel on v3 seems to work quite well too... -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

6 7

ProFTP -> vsFTP Configuration Options
by Forrest Samuels 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

I am moving from a server from running Red Hat 7.2 (with ProFTP) to Centos 3 (with vsFTP). There is a setting in ProFTP that lets me set the default ftp login directory for a specific user and I would like to do the same with vsFTP. The reason being is I have a 'webadmin' user that I use for uploading web content. I am thinking I could make the home directory of the webadmin /var/www in the /etc/passwd file but I would rather it just be for FTP and leave the login home as /home/webadmin. In ProFTP this was set in /etc/proftpd.conf like so: DefaultRoot / webadmin DefaultChdir /var/www webadmin Does anyone know how I can do that? I would like the settings for the other users to work as they are now. I have been looking at chroot_list_enable, and chroot_list_file files but I don't think that is quite what I am looking for (They are both commented out by default). I may be wrong. Thank you for any help! -Forrest

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss