Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34732 discussions

Badly posted "Oracle 9i, 10g, Apps 11.5.9" message.
by Stokely Boast 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Sudev Barar wrote: > This is OT but since you just joined the list do not hijack a thread. > Start a new message and not just change subject line after hitting reply > button. Your message showed up in middle of md0/fstab thread!! Yup, I've already been chastised for this once on the list (did you miss that post?) and I apologized privately via e-mail to the person who pointed out my mistake. I guess that's not enough, so, for you, and everyone else: I'm sorry. It won't happen again. BTW, thanks for the feedback I did get on 9i and 10g installations on CentOS. Are there any Apps 11.5.x lurkers out there, or has nobody actually tried this? I intend to at least attempt it and will post an update (in a _new_ thread) with my findings. This response should be in a new thread unless I really do have my head up my ass. Thanks, Stokely Boast

2 1

upgrade FC3 -> CentOS-4.0-Beta
by Terrel Shumway 16 Feb '05

16 Feb '05

I have two boxes I want to upgrade hedwig is in a DC in Texas so I have no physical access. installed RHEL-3.1 adhoc upgrades with WBEL-3.1 packages (before I discovered yum and apt-rpm) dist upgrade to FC2 using apt-rpm rock-sand is a local development box installed FC3 on one partition installed FC2 on one partition I want to get both machines running CentOS 4.0 rock-sand is my practice machine, so I want to pretend I don't have physical access. In CentOS-3.4-Server.iso there is a pkgorder.txt with a list of the packages in (I assume) the order they should be upgraded. But there is no such file in the CentOS-4.0 distribution. Should I just use the same order but with the new version numbers? What issuses has anyone had with the move to udev?

1 0

Garbled threads.
by Lamar Owen 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Hey, guys, when you are posting a new topic, can you please not use the 'reply; erase subject and message; compose new message; send routine?' Open compose for a new message and paste in centos(a)caosity.org (or, like I do, click on the address in my mail window). Makes it tough on those of us who read in a threaded fashion (I use Kmail myself). -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu

1 0

RE: [Centos] samba joining an ads domain
by Marc Powell 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-bounces@caosity.org] On > Behalf Of Marcello Mezzanotti > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:23 PM > To: centos(a)caosity.org > Subject: [Centos] samba joining an ads domain > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, i just installed CentOS 3.4, im trying to join this machine on > Windows 2000 AD, i did some confs on krb5.conf (REALM CONF) and > smb.conf > > kinit Administrator(a)DOMAIN.COM goes fine but net ads join -U > Administrator give me this: > > [root@sol etc]# net ads join -U Administrator Administrator's > password: > [2005/02/15 17:28:32, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(186) > ads_connect: No credentials found with supported encryption types > [root@sol etc]# > > whats wrong?? Funny, I was _just_ working on this. There are two issues that I encountered, the first being the one above and Google helped to resolve both. To correct your immediate issue, add default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc to the [libdefaults] section of /etc/krb5.conf Additionally, to get ssh access working I needed to disable the use of privileged separation for sshd. The problem in my case is that pam_mkhomedir.so needs root access to create the home directories if they don't exist. The way I've done it makes sshd a little less secure so I'm open to other suggestions... /etc/ssh/sshd_config -- UsePrivilegeSeparation no The information in my log files before the change was -- /var/log/secure Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd[7990]: Accepted password for [username] from [host] port 32781 ssh2 Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd[7992]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]: Permission denied And /var/log/messages Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd(pam_unix)[7990]: check pass; user unknown Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd(pam_unix)[7990]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=[host] Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 pam_winbind[7990]: user '[username]' granted access Feb 15 11:23:29 prodlnx01 sshd(pam_unix)[7992]: session opened for user [username] by (uid=10327) -- Marc

2 1

samba joining an ads domain
by Marcello Mezzanotti 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, i just installed CentOS 3.4, im trying to join this machine on Windows 2000 AD, i did some confs on krb5.conf (REALM CONF) and smb.conf kinit Administrator(a)DOMAIN.COM goes fine but net ads join -U Administrator give me this: [root@sol etc]# net ads join -U Administrator Administrator's password: [2005/02/15 17:28:32, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(186) ads_connect: No credentials found with supported encryption types [root@sol etc]# whats wrong?? Thank you Marcello -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQhJaFkOuB+FVjoUOEQJnoQCbBGdxooozKZBYl/MIp7m+L/pu3SgAn3fy fKsUccG1kvSlJWBlYT5iMjYW =hX7K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content
by donavan nelson 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

To squelch the questions (related to the changing content on www.centos.org) I decided this needs to be published. The CentOS Team has been contacted by representatives of Red Hat's hired legal team regarding the use of Red Hat Trademarks on www.centos.org. (Full Email follows.) While the CentOS team feels we are using Red Hat's marks in a fair and legal manner, we have no choice but to eliminate the majority of the Red Hat marks that are being used on www.centos.org. So over the next few days, we will be cleansing the CentOS website of Red Hat marks and/or possible marks. If you encounter any errors please take a moment to point then out via a comment here or catch donavan in #centos-web on irc.freenode.net. At this point and going forward the CentOS project is not in any jeopardy. We have a strong group of committed developers and are growing like crazy. CentOS 4 is just around the corner; the future is brighter than ever. Read the rest here: http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=66

24 38

CentOS-3 i386 and x86_64 errata: Updated python and rh-postgresql packages fix security issues(s)
by Tru Huynh 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Hi, Updated python, and rh-postgresql have just been uploaded for the i386 and x86_64 architectures. Upgrade with: yum update python\* rh-postgresql\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 x86_64 helper) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

no kernel upgrade on 3.3
by Dave Augustus 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

I have 2 servers: On both, I did yum update. One upgraded the kernel, the other didn't. Why? TIA, Dave Augustus

2 3

Re: Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content
by Rick Graves 15 Feb '05

15 Feb '05

Dag, I think you are taking what RedHat Legal says too literally. Yes, they SAY this is about confusion, but I do not think it is really about confusion. This is about their trademark rights (not covered by the GPL) and what they can do to enhance their revenue flow -- make it harder for the public to know more about the advantages of CentOS. > It's hard to discuss this without knowing what happened exactly after > the > letter was received, but I would have send out a reply asking for > concrete examples and rationale. So I think asking for concrete examples and rationale are not likely to help, as asking for this will not cause RedHat to back down from enfocing their trademark rights -- because of the "real reasons". Rick > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:12:19 +0100 (CET) > From: Dag Wieers <dag(a)wieers.com> > Subject: Re: [Centos] Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website > content > To: CentOS discussion and information list <centos(a)caosity.org> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502142101290.921(a)horsea.3ti.be> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > > I think the issue here might be the fact that Red Hat is mentioned > together with links to the Red Hat site in such a way people might be > misled into thinking CentOS is endorsed by Red Hat or CentOS is the > same > as RHEL. > > Now, it would not surprise me if that message got lost in translation > and > ended up being written as it is in legalese. > > It's hard to discuss this without knowing what happened exactly after > the > letter was received, but I would have send out a reply asking for > concrete > examples and rationale. It makes common sense that if you receive a > message that (partly) does not make sense to you, you ask for > clarification. > > It's in everybody's best interest to get rid of any confusion the > website > might give. We do not want people to believe that CentOS is something > else. > > Let's not focus on one mistake and let everybody do their job and clear > out the mess. I don't think there were ill intentions being used here, > except maybe the guy who posted this on Slashdot. > > -- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- > [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] >

1 0

Start your engines...
by Patrick Lawrence - CentOS Lists 14 Feb '05

14 Feb '05

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os/i386/SRPMS/ is open... Let the building begin. :-) Pat -- "Let's Roll" - Todd Beamer

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss