Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34732 discussions

CentOS-3 i386 errata : Updated enscript package fixes security issues
by Lance Davis 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-039.html refers Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-24.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/enscript-1.6.1-24.4.src.rpm To update run 'yum update enscripts' Lance

1 0

CentOS-3 i386 errata : Updated CUPS packages fix security issue
by Lance Davis 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-049.html refers Updated files :- updates/i386/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.24.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.24.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.24.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.24.src.rpm To update run 'yum update cups' Lance

1 0

CentOS-3 i386 errata : Updated perl-DBI package fixes security issue
by Lance Davis 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-069.html refers Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/perl-DBI-1.32-9.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/perl-DBI-1.32-9.src.rpm To update run 'yum update perl-DBI' Lance

1 0

(no subject)
by Melinda Odom 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

Hi, I have just changed OS'es from ES3 to CentOS. Is this the correct list to find out about updates available for centOS? With ES3 I received an update email with the regular and security updates available and would run up2date. Now, I have yum and am not familiar with how updates are sent about centOS. Thanks! Sincerely, Melinda Odom www.designhosting.biz 479-471-0891 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005

4 4

Updates to CentOS-4Beta
by Johnny Hughes 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

1. There are updates to CentOS-4Beta for the i386 and x86_64 arches. The following RPMS have been changed: a. createrepo-0.4.2-1.noarch.rpm - This is an update from the upstream maintainer. b. yum-2.1.13-1.c4.noarch.rpm - This is an update from the upstream maintainer. c. firefox-1.0-6.centos4.3.i386.rpm - The original build did not strip the library files of unnecessary symbols, causing the library files to be up to 3x the normal size. This rebuild properly stripped the library files. The following mozilla based files had the same library files strip issue: mozilla-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-chat-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-devel-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-dom-inspector-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-js-debugger-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-mail-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-nspr-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-nspr-devel-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-nss-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm mozilla-nss-devel-1.7.5-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm thunderbird-0.8.0-9.centos4.1.i386.rpm d. up2date-4.3.53-1.src.rpm was released on the RHN channel for RHEL4- Beta2 prior to the channel closing. up2date-4.3.53-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm and up2date-gnome-4.3.53-1.centos4.2.i386.rpm were created from that source as upgrades to the original up2date used. e. redhat-artwork-0.120-1.1E.centos4.1.i386.rpm and redhat- logos-1.1.22-1.centos4.1.noarch.rpm were upgraded to include better quality CentOS logos. 2. The yum grouplist, groupinstall, groupupdate features have been added to the CentOS-4Beta repositories. Here are some links that explain how to use the yum group features: http://fedoranews.org/tchung/yum-groupinstall/ http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/printthread.php?t=25880 http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/General/yum_HOWTO/yum_HOWTO/yum_HOWTO-11.html Thank you, Johnny Hughes CentOS-4 Project Lead

2 1

PXE boot Centos 4.0beta problems
by Alan Sparks 31 Jan '05

31 Jan '05

Has anyone yet tried PXE booting the vmlinuz/initrd.img set from Centos 4.0beta2? I have a pxelinux setup that is booting 3.4 PXE images fine, but the equivalent setup for 4.0beta loads the kernel and then splashes the monitor full of multicolor random characters. Not a good start to an install... Anyone had luck? Any changes for PXE boots known for 4.0? Thanks in advance. -Alan

2 2

modprobe and modules not found
by Robert Hanson 31 Jan '05

31 Jan '05

Greetings, test server: 1.8 MHz Intel P4 D865PERL Intel MB w/ built in 10/100 NIC, sound etc. I’ve loaded CentOS 3.3 – yum upgraded to 3.4 I am used to “much older” Linux kernel/distributions i.e. like 1.2.13 and early 2.x stuff. I humbly ask why these modules are not found in the distribution. Please point me to where I get them and associated instructions please. I am sure I am looking in the wrong place(s). --------------------- ModProbe Begin ------------------------ Can't locate these modules: sound-service-1-0: 2 Time(s) sound-service-0-0: 1 Time(s) sound-slot-1: 2 Time(s) char-major-188: 1 Time(s) ---------------------- ModProbe End ------------------------- Thanks in advance and apologies for bringing such an annoyingly simple problem to the list. - rh -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.2 - Release Date: 1/28/2005

1 0

cryptoloop enabled losetup package
by Alexander Georgiev 31 Jan '05

31 Jan '05

Hi, I have a legacy AES excrypted file system with a 256 key size. RHEL kernel is cryptoloop enabled but the losetup package is not. It needs additional patch. Does anybody have a patched losetup rpm I could use? Thank you! A. Georgiev

1 0

Error unmounting ?
by UnIData 31 Jan '05

31 Jan '05

When i shutdown my computer i see the following message: Unmounting file systems: umount2: Device or resource busy umount: /var: device is busy What is the error ??? I install centos 3.4 on i386. Thanks for help

2 1

x86_64 timer resolution in ping results
by Simon Garner 31 Jan '05

31 Jan '05

Hi, There seems to be a problem with the timer resolution on x86_64. This is clear in ping results - I don't know if it's just a ping problem or if it manifests elsewhere as well. It does also affect mtr and traceroute times. I guess it's more a kernel issue than a CentOS problem, but is anyone else seeing the same? Ping results have a resolution of 10ms - so a ping <10ms shows as 0.000ms... --- On an Opteron machine running CentOS-3.4 --- # uname -a Linux omega.xxx 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jan 19 11:28:26 CST 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # ping 192.168.1.200 PING 192.168.1.200 (192.168.1.200) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.200: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.200: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.200: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.200: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.200: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms --- 192.168.1.200 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.000/0.000/0.000/0.000 ms, pipe 2 # ping google.com PING google.com (216.239.39.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=230 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=220 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=220 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=230 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=230 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=240 time=220 ms --- google.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5050ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 220.006/225.006/230.006/5.000 ms, pipe 2 ---- Expected result: On an i686 machine running CentOS-3.3 ---- # ping 192.168.1.202 PING 192.168.1.202 (192.168.1.202) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.202: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.094 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.202: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.059 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.202: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.070 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.202: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.057 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.202: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.068 ms --- 192.168.1.202 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4016ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.057/0.069/0.094/0.016 ms, pipe 2 # ping google.com PING google.com (216.239.39.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=201 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=203 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=201 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=202 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=201 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.39.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=240 time=201 ms --- google.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5049ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.044/201.939/203.012/0.926 ms, pipe 2 Kind regards, -Simon

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss