Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

cron
by Marcin Trendota 26 Apr '16

26 Apr '16

What the heck is wrong with cron? */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php /var/www/html/osticket/api/cron.php in /etc/cron.d doesn't get executed at all (ran from console works of course!). But the SAME file in /tmp runs flawlessly: */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php /tmp/cron.php It's CentOS7 on VPS with no SELinux. I've noticed similiar behavior before (on bare metal server with SELinux). -- Over And Out MoonWolf

13 23

evolution libsoup and samba bug 765106
by Andreas Benzler 26 Apr '16

26 Apr '16

Hello everyone, while i was play around with winhq install winbind-clients. After this I never can open evolution with exchange ews connector. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765106 I patches libsoup by my self diff -up ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c.prev ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c --- ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c.prev 2016-04-15 14:18:02.680276592 +0200 +++ ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c 2016-04-15 15:20:00.337116508 +0200 @@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ soup_auth_ntlm_update_connection (SoupCo conn->state = SOUP_NTLM_SSO_FAILED; success = FALSE; } else if (!g_ascii_strcasecmp (response, "PW")) { + conn->state = SOUP_NTLM_SSO_FAILED; priv->sso_available = FALSE; g_free (response); } else { @@ -489,7 +490,7 @@ soup_auth_ntlm_get_connection_authorizat priv->sso_available = FALSE; } } else { - g_warning ("NTLM single-sign-on using %s failed", NTLM_AUTH); + g_debug ("NTLM single-sign-on using %s failed", NTLM_AUTH); } } /* If NTLM single-sign-on fails, go back to original @@ -525,7 +526,7 @@ soup_auth_ntlm_get_connection_authorizat #ifdef USE_NTLM_AUTH case SOUP_NTLM_SSO_FAILED: /* Restart request without SSO */ - g_warning ("NTLM single-sign-on by using %s failed", NTLM_AUTH); + g_debug ("NTLM single-sign-on by using %s failed", NTLM_AUTH); priv->sso_available = FALSE; header = soup_ntlm_request (); conn->state = SOUP_NTLM_SENT_REQUEST; and rebuild mock SRPMS/libsoup-2.48.1-4.el7.centos.src.rpm Now I can open evolution with winbind-cients installed. http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/other/SRPMS/libsoup-2.48.1-4.el7.centos.… Hopefully without any other side effect. Sincerely Andy

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 26 Apr '16

26 Apr '16

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2016:0684 Moderate CentOS 5 nspr Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2016:0684 Moderate CentOS 5 nss Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nspr Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nss-util Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nss-softokn Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nss Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:19:01 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0684 Moderate CentOS 5 nspr Security Update Message-ID: <20160425131901.GA13582(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0684 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0684.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 2542e599e93d78a8b51ee1e9ad58b24edf8d70029defc49f8b032e4b5782c6bf nspr-4.11.0-1.el5_11.i386.rpm 5dedec41a954bc0562095cd6d5c43165056c256a66cf1389df0d8414e7c96105 nspr-devel-4.11.0-1.el5_11.i386.rpm x86_64: 2542e599e93d78a8b51ee1e9ad58b24edf8d70029defc49f8b032e4b5782c6bf nspr-4.11.0-1.el5_11.i386.rpm f54f893419cc8223d491056a96e33c327a1a6b3e6585c9d91edcaf227a546dc3 nspr-4.11.0-1.el5_11.x86_64.rpm 5dedec41a954bc0562095cd6d5c43165056c256a66cf1389df0d8414e7c96105 nspr-devel-4.11.0-1.el5_11.i386.rpm d0bc78381c24c31a38ea4297e6ec8f6b2dceb676fa83be84d07d8213f9b1c441 nspr-devel-4.11.0-1.el5_11.x86_64.rpm Source: 27c20b9b8a0d828b87cf67ca091669580d1506904edac211c643a8ab5f2fcaa6 nspr-4.11.0-1.el5_11.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:20:12 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0684 Moderate CentOS 5 nss Security Update Message-ID: <20160425132012.GA13713(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0684 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0684.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 22a25171db9d8a514be909e7a8eef944e73b3194d6dc51c1e4e351adfb62035e nss-3.21.0-6.el5_11.i386.rpm 28ae63c316cc4f13f29e8cb0dfcf13b004dd591386eeed974b5721adf1b62f5d nss-devel-3.21.0-6.el5_11.i386.rpm bd69e9a3c779a8fc3a9c5f1d2db5cecc2c30b92fbb7a3d1f65cdc86f4cf04339 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.21.0-6.el5_11.i386.rpm d70335c291e0b4b34b7e7e4294a284b59d26617edb92d601b2e281c3e48995aa nss-tools-3.21.0-6.el5_11.i386.rpm x86_64: 22a25171db9d8a514be909e7a8eef944e73b3194d6dc51c1e4e351adfb62035e nss-3.21.0-6.el5_11.i386.rpm 891293a24f0e8664504d9bf777844c333efb8f77d7bed69163857dea240e0425 nss-3.21.0-6.el5_11.x86_64.rpm 28ae63c316cc4f13f29e8cb0dfcf13b004dd591386eeed974b5721adf1b62f5d nss-devel-3.21.0-6.el5_11.i386.rpm c442280aab2f2064a0ef4b0794ac1f926422eb44a1e8c0759a54f6f0f71e9cce nss-devel-3.21.0-6.el5_11.x86_64.rpm bd69e9a3c779a8fc3a9c5f1d2db5cecc2c30b92fbb7a3d1f65cdc86f4cf04339 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.21.0-6.el5_11.i386.rpm f412a80e0611d89981d883653a2bb309afbd20dd825770d45ef0d267e6ee18e7 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.21.0-6.el5_11.x86_64.rpm ae5698473b4847dc48f6e13ed0747c092487843889f88df8741692076fd6ff25 nss-tools-3.21.0-6.el5_11.x86_64.rpm Source: 4813046342f6562e761c0d1f6c782de5cebaa62fa06523482498dcd1b2c2e8ea nss-3.21.0-6.el5_11.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:49:11 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nspr Security Update Message-ID: <20160425174911.GA16668(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0685 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0685.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: daf7526f2f1ccc56ec97e57940cde39049a4a111951b01197b2c18b4bc7ec1cb nspr-4.11.0-1.el7_2.i686.rpm d784f223e384f756a5c594925512c5fd6d46aaad66f85936b51453a0dc2dbd8a nspr-4.11.0-1.el7_2.x86_64.rpm 56037499e8d01dd812e5ff3a2752c9aa108dd45fd816269abae28fd6eaa751b1 nspr-devel-4.11.0-1.el7_2.i686.rpm 5b3fbd8326f1249e287423a753d2b249e4d7281c669943c367a62d6f839dfde5 nspr-devel-4.11.0-1.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source: 6520f99cd5afa95d605bcc653f47c828e2fb491a548e057d0c99e91a57a1dac3 nspr-4.11.0-1.el7_2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:49:24 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nss-util Security Update Message-ID: <20160425174924.GA16739(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0685 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0685.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 73472239f7a39dfce534c7a7d354a0c47c56d4164bd751e9709285dc52526a52 nss-util-3.21.0-2.2.el7_2.i686.rpm ebe0bba24d7b4477830fe4dbb025e91ca30a619e5806241a84c7e4c420bab53c nss-util-3.21.0-2.2.el7_2.x86_64.rpm e512d5a51c14dca89b2207be8a6aa792cf3e5e549f4f525f5d26800b705b8a72 nss-util-devel-3.21.0-2.2.el7_2.i686.rpm 2013f4efb5ccdee9431259c717c2f473dff61f0b26f39a2e46012764f7a127c5 nss-util-devel-3.21.0-2.2.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source: e90e5e5834289fae968dd2d04f9d563d7a67e3c733ebc2291b7ab131f93c5e14 nss-util-3.21.0-2.2.el7_2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:49:35 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nss-softokn Security Update Message-ID: <20160425174935.GA16820(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0685 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0685.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 3119ce33b30bd2aee2e386f0a3f2f01c90c9869ae2cb39a685f913e7a4d0e14a nss-softokn-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.i686.rpm d207816db9a598d15c0856a925b28221f4166968fba76d09aa01aa9ea6c44170 nss-softokn-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.x86_64.rpm e544515243939f744d849b645cfb308bf0d4f73e57c29d52d4023fb264b61298 nss-softokn-devel-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.i686.rpm 5e8c6639e808aaa869b50e9c1c5b827ab6960c5dcc371c1ba42b4dddbae6888e nss-softokn-devel-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.x86_64.rpm c579edfa53c72797701474fbbbc1c19d90ed7c407046d7718e25234b0887acb7 nss-softokn-freebl-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.i686.rpm 9253b359efea3686548eeb043ed0e0bf5e859a677c98452e1bec39d500756e94 nss-softokn-freebl-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.x86_64.rpm 871ddd52d4894f9a515683607b009e206dd7c181158f5a7bb1f88349236fbbc8 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.i686.rpm bccc6cb31656273c92f1288717bcc7f8578b3c42670433812f68e9164dd326f2 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source: 698e112d5ce13a9e9703bac655fe9d2a75fa85bc828af64a965bbc0e880c62d2 nss-softokn-3.16.2.3-14.2.el7_2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:49:47 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0685 Moderate CentOS 7 nss Security Update Message-ID: <20160425174947.GA16905(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0685 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0685.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: acc0e05d8f247791db76ab9b21359abc7908c1ab9ead506964b52955287fe25b nss-3.21.0-9.el7_2.i686.rpm 33e2a1aa657f809c53449627200616b683de444300a5b2c2a79510e3e5912b00 nss-3.21.0-9.el7_2.x86_64.rpm bce90a8604496832d35d0cfefa05a552f9f3e1d866d5f6dfb0c1763d5ad34009 nss-devel-3.21.0-9.el7_2.i686.rpm ab4370a426efcdbf15bc1730f3a077150a597edb103ebbabaceb39d84f0fb96c nss-devel-3.21.0-9.el7_2.x86_64.rpm 87f7e4956ae9aeff3821b2b28b9f3500b94b0037d9280b10149833b3e4a65902 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.21.0-9.el7_2.i686.rpm e1ac83844836b6605c439bb5fa70be50163b9154d27ffcb45fc01c183fdc9c29 nss-pkcs11-devel-3.21.0-9.el7_2.x86_64.rpm 2a0881f7703e23a95aa8db53858285793eb30ceb198a7a20fa816c60e472a15d nss-sysinit-3.21.0-9.el7_2.x86_64.rpm abb98d8a2a2737ab4031c145c1503cf31bb3b2b54983547e2675b0b08805eaf6 nss-tools-3.21.0-9.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source: 7b8295c752cbd420b5ae52a8b4aa8fa9b6979c57f9caa8279c14e3865ce62883 nss-3.21.0-9.el7_2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 13 ************************************************

1 0

what does firefox have against sans-serif
by Michael Hennebry 24 Apr '16

24 Apr '16

I've been struggling to get Firefox to render text in a sans-serif font. So far, I've only been able to do that by setting the default font as sans-serif. DejaVu Sans Mono and DajaVu Sans are the only other listed fonts that I'm reasonalbly sure are sans-serif. Helvetica and Arial are not there. sans-serif does work on Konqueror. Does anyone know how to affect the font-family on Firefox 38.7.0 ? -- Michael hennebry(a)web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 12
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

1 0

FirewallD issue
by Marcin Trendota 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

Hello everybody. Recently i moved external interface to zone "external" on my home server/router. And something strange is hapening. From my router (chamber, CentOS7) everything is fine: [root@chamber ~]# firewall-cmd --list-all home (default, active) interfaces: enp3s0 tun0 virbr0 sources: services: dhcp dhcpv6-client dns http https imaps ipp-client mdns nfs samba samba-client vnc-server ports: 143/tcp 26666/tcp masquerade: no forward-ports: icmp-blocks: rich rules: [root@chamber ~]# firewall-cmd --list-all --zone=external external (active) interfaces: enp1s0 sources: services: ports: 26666/tcp masquerade: yes forward-ports: icmp-blocks: rich rules: [root@chamber ~]# nmap 10.0.49.14 Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-04-21 11:57 CEST Nmap scan report for 10.0.49.14 Host is up (0.00045s latency). Not shown: 997 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp open ssh 80/tcp open http 443/tcp open https MAC Address: 52:54:00:D6:6D:4A (QEMU Virtual NIC) Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.18 seconds But from host in another location (connected through VPN): moonwolf  ~  nmap 10.0.49.14 Starting Nmap 7.12 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2016-04-21 11:59 CEST Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our ping probes, try -Pn Nmap done: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 0.06 seconds moonwolf  ~  nmap 10.0.49.14 -Pn -p22 Starting Nmap 7.12 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2016-04-21 11:59 CEST Nmap scan report for svn.karakkhaz.dwarfs (10.0.49.14) Host is up (0.015s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp filtered ssh Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.05 seconds moonwolf  ~  ping 10.0.49.14 PING 10.0.49.14 (10.0.49.14) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.0.49.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=9.45 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.49.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=62 time=26.0 ms ^C --- 10.0.49.14 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.459/17.754/26.050/8.296 ms What could cause this behavior? Before interface move everything was working as expected. -- Over And Out MoonWolf

3 6

Dual boot C7 with Window 10
by Jerry Geis 22 Apr '16

22 Apr '16

I have a laptop with windows 10. I went into the Windows disk manager and shrunk the volume to make room for C7. That worked. I also changed the BIOS from secure boot to "both" (secure/legacy) I installed C7, went fine. About the time it was done I realized I never saw anything about "other" boot options (seems I saw that in the past). Anyway sure enough, got done and C7 boots fine - no option there for Windows. I did searching and found I needed to add to the /etc/grub.d/40_custom the following: menuentry "Windows 10" { set root='(hd0,1)' chainloader +1 } then re-run the grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg I then rebooted and sure enough I got the menu item for "Windows 10" however when I select it it does not boot. How do I get Windows 10 to boot again ? Thanks, Jerry

5 9

Suddenly increased my hard disk
by Chandran Manikandan 22 Apr '16

22 Apr '16

Hi All, I have running Centos 6.5 32 bit machine. This machine is running qmailtoaster packages and mailbox size is 385 GB. if i run the df -h command it show 385 GB out of 1TB I have run the same command today suddenly shows 576 GB out of 1 TB. I didn't update any bulk file and mail transaction is not very high. How do i check this issue and fix it. how do i find out and why suddenly showing this much of increasing the size of hard disk. Could anyone help me -- *Thanks,* *Manikandan.C* *System Administrator*

13 38

Fwd: EPEL-ANNOUNCE Re: Upcoming OwnCloud changes in EPEL
by James Hogarth 22 Apr '16

22 Apr '16

In the event that there are CentOS users making use of the EPEL owncloud packages, but not following the EPEL mailing lists, please read the mail below with regards to your installations. Thanks James ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> Date: 22 Apr 2016 16:21 Subject: EPEL-ANNOUNCE Re: Upcoming OwnCloud changes in EPEL To: "EPEL Development List" <epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Cc: <epel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> > > > On 5 April 2016 at 09:22, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Following on the process of bringing OwnCloud up to date in Fedora we're turning our attention to the EPEL users. >> >> Unfortunately EL6's use of php53 means we cannot update any further there given the minimum requirement of php54. >> >> As such the maintenance update of 7.0.13 that is in epel-testing now for EPEL6 will be the final one there to be followed by the retiring of the package. >> >> If you wish to update from that please either migrate to an EL7 base system or switch to the OwnCloud upstream packages which make use of SCL to satisfy the php54+ requirement. >> >> On the EPEL7 side of things 8.1.6 is due to hit testing very shortly. This is a mandatory update as a precursor to the 8.2.3 update in due course. Once this reaches live please ensure that updates are carried out and your OwnCloud installation is fully tested prior to the 8.2.3 update. >> >> This is due to a requirement from upstream that updates follow the path 8.0 -> 8.1 -> 8.2 -> 9.0. >> >> Related to this when updating the EL6 install from the 7.0 version to an EL7 or upstream SCL version please do make sure you follow the upgrade chain correctly - it is not possible to skip a step. >> >> Once the 8.2 goal is reached a discussion will be had then for EPEL as to whether to provide owncloud82 and owncloud90 packages or to just stay on the current major update - but that discussion is some time away as of yet. >> >> The reason for picking owncloud82 as the possible base for this is that this is the first version that has no php libraries bundled so will be the easiest to provide the long term maintained base from in a clean fashion complying to guidelines as closely as possible. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> James >> >> > > Following on from the previous message EPEL6 has it's final update with the EOL message. Please arrange to move to the upstream SCL packages or to migrate to EL7 if you are using owncloud on EPEL6 - be aware when you do migrate off of this that it is important to follow the chain through 8.0->8.1->8.2 checking your installation at each step. > > EPEL7 has had some time in testing and received a positive test so the 8.1.6 update there is being pushed today. > > When that has gone stable an 8.2.3 update will be pushed to epel-testing. Please ensure that your installation is updated to 8.1.6 and fully tested before applying the 8.2.3 update. > > Kind regards, > > James > > > > _______________________________________________ > epel-announce mailing list > epel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-announce@lists.fedoraprojec… >

1 0

Postgrey on CentOS 6
by Gabriele Pohl 22 Apr '16

22 Apr '16

Hi, I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel for this CentOS release as I have seen now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing mail server to get security patches again or is it not critical to use the old package? 2. Can you give advice for an alternative setup of greylisting for postfix on CentOS 6? Cheers, Gabriele

3 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss