13 Nov
2008
13 Nov
'08
9:21 p.m.
I thought the were default configuration differences between RHEL and CentOS such that in theory it was "more secure" out of the box.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:56 PM, centos@911networks.com wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:53 -0500 "Michael Schenck" limeschenck@gmail.com wrote:
CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got "better HW support"...
CentOS is identical to RHEL, except for the copyrights, licensing and logos. The keyword is identical.
Why is it more secure? Why would CentOS have better HW support?
-- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work