On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen lowen@pari.edu wrote:
On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ?
Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's subscribers do you suppose that might be? (It is neither welcome nor unwelcome by me, as I've said before.)
Feedback on the direction of the distribution's development is taken on the -devel list; this list is for questions about using the distribution.
See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says "this is strictly about development."
I take that to mean it is for developers. I am not a developer for CentOS. I don't know this, but I'm guessing there are many many users and admins of CentOS who are not on that list, like me. Even a "Please check out this thread for an important discussion about the future of CentOS release names." would have been appreciated.
Now it's too late.
(As I said earlier, it's not just the ISO name either).