Hi All, we've run into a problem with the xfs component in the centosplus kernel (2.6.9-34.106.unsupportedsmp) where synchronous writes sometimes fail with EAGAIN. It's causing headaches for DB2 installs and for our database research group. There is a fix reported at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=110808122904352&w=2
...that's supposed to take care of things. If there is any way these patches could be included in a future centosplus kernel, we would greatly appreciate it. We are enjoying the performance lift from xfs on many systems, and hate to throw it away to get a database to work.
Also, are there plans to produce a centosplus kernel that corresponds to the newest RHEL errata kernel (2.6.9-34.0.1.EL)?
Cheers and thanks,
Dave Thompson UW-Madison
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 16:24 -0500, David Thompson wrote:
Hi All, we've run into a problem with the xfs component in the centosplus kernel (2.6.9-34.106.unsupportedsmp) where synchronous writes sometimes fail with EAGAIN. It's causing headaches for DB2 installs and for our database research group. There is a fix reported at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=110808122904352&w=2
...that's supposed to take care of things. If there is any way these patches could be included in a future centosplus kernel, we would greatly appreciate it. We are enjoying the performance lift from xfs on many systems, and hate to throw it away to get a database to work.
Also, are there plans to produce a centosplus kernel that corresponds to the newest RHEL errata kernel (2.6.9-34.0.1.EL)?
Cheers and thanks,
Dave Thompson UW-Madison
David,
There is a centosplus kernel that has that errata ... it is version: kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4
However ... if the only thing you need from the centosplus kernel is the xfs ... you should use the normal (non-centosplus) kernel and the kernel-xfs-module that matches it from here:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/i386/RPMS/
or
http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
(That code is from SGI and has all the latest patches.)
Thanks, Johnny Hughes