Hi,
Just wondering, has anybody thought of making openldap 2.3.x part of centos plus? I had some problems with openldap 2.2.x, and all the answers I got about it were to upgrade to 2.3. It seems 2.2 is dead release nowdays, and openldap people do not recommend using it for production anymore.
I agree, it would be nice. Meanwhile, I think there is a .rpm in the FAQ site at www.openldap.org
HTH Oliver
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering, has anybody thought of making openldap 2.3.x part of centos plus? I had some problems with openldap 2.2.x, and all the answers I got about it were to upgrade to 2.3. It seems 2.2 is dead release nowdays, and openldap people do not recommend using it for production anymore.
--See Ya' later, alligator! http://www.8-P.ca/
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Quoting "Oliver Schulze L." oliver@samera.com.py:
I agree, it would be nice. Meanwhile, I think there is a .rpm in the FAQ site at www.openldap.org
I guess you are reffering to Symas packages, which is what I'm currently using. However, Symas packages install under /opt, not really a drop-in replacement. Hence my question/request for openldap-2.3 in centosplus.
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:07:21AM -0500, Aleksandar Milivojevic enlightened us:
Quoting "Oliver Schulze L." oliver@samera.com.py:
I agree, it would be nice. Meanwhile, I think there is a .rpm in the FAQ site at www.openldap.org
I guess you are reffering to Symas packages, which is what I'm currently using. However, Symas packages install under /opt, not really a drop-in replacement. Hence my question/request for openldap-2.3 in centosplus.
It might be possible to backport one from Fedora. I'll give it a try here in the next week or so and see how it goes.
Matt
It might be possible to backport one from Fedora. I'll give it a try here in the next week or so and see how it goes.
The backport does indeed build and install, I'll test it here for a day or two to make sure it's stable, and then toss it up in the dev.centos.org repository.
I'd have answered this sooner, but the job scene is interesting right now, and consuming most of my free time for the next few weeks or so.
Quoting Jim Perrin jperrin@gmail.com:
It might be possible to backport one from Fedora. I'll give it a try here in the next week or so and see how it goes.
The backport does indeed build and install, I'll test it here for a day or two to make sure it's stable, and then toss it up in the dev.centos.org repository.
I'd have answered this sooner, but the job scene is interesting right now, and consuming most of my free time for the next few weeks or so.
I also just finished recompile and few basic tests on Fedora's package.
I needed to change spec file a bit since it required bind-libbind-devel and libtool-ltdl-devel which seem to be some Fedora specific stuff (probably part of bind-devel and and libtool/libtool-libs on CentOS, but I haven't checked).
When upgrading, the compat package was also needed since many parts of CentOS depend on 2.2 libs.
I needed to change spec file a bit since it required bind-libbind-devel and libtool-ltdl-devel which seem to be some Fedora specific stuff (probably part of bind-devel and and libtool/libtool-libs on CentOS, but I haven't checked).
yes, bind-libbind-devel is bind-devel and libtool-ltdl-devel is libtool
-
Aleksandar Milivojevic -
Jim Perrin -
Matt Hyclak -
Oliver Schulze L.