I have an OpenWrt 10.03 router [ IP: 192.168.1.1 ], and it has a DHCP server pool: 192.168.1.0/24 - clients are using it through wireless/wired connection. Ok!
Here's the catch: I need to separate the users from each other.
How i need to do it: by IPTABLES rule [ /etc/firewall.user ]. Ok!
"Loud thinking": So i need a rule something like this [on the OpenWrt router]:
- DROP where SOURCE: 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.255 and DESTINATION is 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.255
The idea is this. Ok!
Questions! - Will i lock out myself if i apply this firewall rule? - Is this a secure method? [ is it easy to do this?: hello, i'm a client, and i say, my IP address is 192.168.1.1! - now it can sniff the unencrypted traffic! :( - because all the clients are in the same subnet! ] - Are there any good methods to find/audit for duplicated IP addresses? - Are the any good methods to find/audit for duplicated MAC addresses? - Are there any good methods to do this IPTALBES rule on Layer2?: `$ wget -q "http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03/ar71xx/packages/" -O - | grep -i ebtables` `$ `
p.s.: The rule would be [is it on a good chain?]: iptables -A FORWARD -m iprange --src-range 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.255 --dst-range 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.255 -j DROP
Thank you!
On 03/05/11 12:58 AM, erikmccaskey64 wrote:
I have an OpenWrt 10.03 router [ IP: 192.168.1.1 ], and it has a DHCP server pool: 192.168.1.0/24 - clients are using it through wireless/wired connection. Ok!
um, this is CentOS, not OpenWRT, I believe they have their own email lists...
however, since we're here and I've looked into those htings in some depth.... The LAN ports on the WRT54 family routers are a hardware ethernet switch, and packets aren't normally passed through the WRT's processor. You *can* reconfigure the switch to make each LAN port a different VLAN but then every packet has to go through the rather slow WRT CPU, and it only has a single 100baseT ethernet port, which now has to service 5 VLAN (WAN + 4 LANs). The WLAN is on a seperate port to the processor which normally it bridges.
John, by answering you just encourage him to go on with this. He's a parallel menace of 4 mailing lists. Ralph wanted to unsubscribe him, but he didn't have access to the interface then. I'll remind him.
Kai