Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Hi list, I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
They're doing it as emx, where x=[1...], except where it wants old Sun-style pxdx... which I hate. I can live with emx, if I have to.
People who can't count from 0....
Folks here heard about the actual fork of systemd called uselessd? And they want it to do actual work, but not much of what systemd does...?
mark "saw it on slashdot"
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:06 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
They're doing it as emx, where x=[1...], except where it wants old Sun-style pxdx... which I hate. I can live with emx, if I have to.
What hardware is that on? The only multi-NIC box I've installed so far is an HP with eno1 through eno4 plus ens2f0, ens2f1, ens3f0, and ens3f1. A similar remote box has eno1-eno4 plus ensf0 and ensf1. I'm assuming the nics there are installed in a different slot....
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:06 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
They're doing it as emx, where x=[1...], except where it wants old Sun-style pxdx... which I hate. I can live with emx, if I have to.
What hardware is that on? The only multi-NIC box I've installed so far is an HP with eno1 through eno4 plus ens2f0, ens2f1, ens3f0, and ens3f1. A similar remote box has eno1-eno4 plus ensf0 and ensf1. I'm assuming the nics there are installed in a different slot....
Dell PowerEdges, R-various (720, 420, etc), which have two or four on-board NICs.
mark
-
Les Mikesell -
m.roth＠5-cent.us