On 4/25/07, Michael D. Kralka michael.kralka@kvs.com wrote:
I am going to regret answering this, because it is not the right place for such questions. However...
True, but thank you for the post.
I suspect you are misusing printk and the KERN_XXX prefixes (KERN_DEBUG, KERN_ERR, KERN_INFO, etc.) defined in include/linux/kernel.h. Try dropping the comma between the prefix and the message. That is: printk(KERN_INFO "Hello World!\n"); rather than: printk(KERN_INFO, "Hello World!\n");
I would hate to admit that a typo was "misusing" something, but this was the problem - one of the 35 traces I have in place was mistyped with a comma after the KERN_DEBUG. I think staring at them allowed me to miss this the first four or five times through, and, of course, it was the last one I added - the one that was not supposed to appear at all.
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
On 4/25/07, Michael D. Kralka michael.kralka@kvs.com wrote:
I am going to regret answering this, because it is not the right place for such questions. However...
True, but thank you for the post.
Your mail reader is shredding references. Could you please try to fix that?
Thanks,
Ralph
On 4/25/07, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
On 4/25/07, Michael D. Kralka michael.kralka@kvs.com wrote:
I am going to regret answering this, because it is not the right place for such questions. However...
True, but thank you for the post.
Your mail reader is shredding references. Could you please try to fix that?
I deleted what I thought was no longer necessary for the discussion to continue. My mail reader does pretty much exactly what I want it to (one of the reasons I like gmail). Between the subject and the above content, I thought the thread was pretty clear. Could you clarify what you think I should have left in so I can improve on my posts in the future?
Thanks.
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
On 4/25/07, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Your mail reader is shredding references. Could you please try to fix that?
I deleted what I thought was no longer necessary for the discussion to continue. My mail reader does pretty much exactly what I want it to (one of the reasons I like gmail). Between the subject and the above content, I thought the thread was pretty clear. Could you clarify what you think I should have left in so I can improve on my posts in the future?
The "In-Reply-To:"-Header.
Which strangely worked now.
Ralph