Folks - FYI:
I finally got it to work (at least once)!
reboot=bios,smp,warm
Since I didn't actually TRY 'reboot=triple', I, of course, am wondering if 'reboot=triple' is synonymous for 'reboot=bios,smp,warm' ...
Mmmmm - masochism!!!
A co-worker pointed me to this:
/usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.9/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
Specifically:
reboot= [BUGS=IA-32,BUGS=ARM,BUGS=IA-64] Rebooting mode Format: <reboot_mode>[,<reboot_mode2>[,...]] See arch/*/kernel/reboot.c or arch/*/kernel/process.c
BUT - I don't have either 'reboot.c' or 'process.c' (ARG!)
So ... after a TON of googling I found references to various combinations of the three, but not all three together.
It works!!! FINALLY!!!
Thanks. I'll give it a try.
On 06/03/07, Joe Kazura joe.kazura@unh.edu wrote:
Folks - FYI:
I finally got it to work (at least once)!
reboot=bios,smp,warm
Since I didn't actually TRY 'reboot=triple', I, of course, am wondering if 'reboot=triple' is synonymous for 'reboot=bios,smp,warm' ...
Mmmmm - masochism!!!
A co-worker pointed me to this:
/usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.9/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
Specifically:
reboot= [BUGS=IA-32,BUGS=ARM,BUGS=IA-64] Rebooting mode Format: <reboot_mode>[,<reboot_mode2>[,...]] See arch/*/kernel/reboot.c or arch/*/kernel/process.c
BUT - I don't have either 'reboot.c' or 'process.c' (ARG!)
So ... after a TON of googling I found references to various combinations of the three, but not all three together.
It works!!! FINALLY!!!
-- +----------------------------[ Joe.Kazura@UNH.EDU ]---+ | Joe Kazura | Mac OS X ... | CIS/TCS -- 1 Leavitt Lane PHONE: +1-603-862-2012 | Because UNIX | University of New Hampshire | should be user | Durham, NH 03824-3512 USA "docendo discimus" | friendly! | | +-----------------[ http://www.unh.edu/tcs/ ]---------+
On Mar 2, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Morten Torstensen wrote:
Joe Kazura wrote:
Well - reboot=bios didn't work ... I'll try 'reboot=triple' when I get a chance.
Speaking of the devil... I've had a mobo where I needed reboot=bios on CentOS 4. Now with RHEL5, that parameter is no longer effective. Seems like YMMV a lot. I will try to remember to keep you updated if I find another solution :)
--
//Morten Torstensen
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos