All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, What information is returned when you type file eula ?
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, What information is returned when you type file eula ?
typing in ./eula returns -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system different than EL5 Linux.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, What information is returned when you type file eula ?
typing in ./eula returns -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system different than EL5 Linux.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on one of my systems if I type
file /usr/bin/pstree
/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, What information is returned when you type file eula ?
typing in ./eula returns -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system different than EL5 Linux.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on one of my systems if I type
file /usr/bin/pstree
/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
Clint,
Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification
Here is the result. eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped
Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree?
Greg
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> All.... > > I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker > staff have been helpful but no cigar. > > At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine > so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received > the same error. > > One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called > eula which fails. > > ./eula: cannot execute binary file > > The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use > Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. > > I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be > listening to this list and could give me a hand. > > Thanks much!!! > > Greg Ennis > > _______________________________________________ > > >
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, What information is returned when you type file eula ?
typing in ./eula returns -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system different than EL5 Linux.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on one of my systems if I type
file /usr/bin/pstree
/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
Clint,
Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification
Here is the result. eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped
Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree?
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, Definitely.
I can't tell you off hand what system its compiler for but most likely AIX or PowerPC.
Tkae Care
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:36 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. > If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and > see what it's doing? > Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not > executable, which should be easy to fix. > > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > >> All.... >> >> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker >> staff have been helpful but no cigar. >> >> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine >> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received >> the same error. >> >> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called >> eula which fails. >> >> ./eula: cannot execute binary file >> >> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use >> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. >> >> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be >> listening to this list and could give me a hand. >> >> Thanks much!!! >> >> Greg Ennis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, What information is returned when you type file eula ?
typing in ./eula returns -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system different than EL5 Linux.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on one of my systems if I type
file /usr/bin/pstree
/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
Clint,
Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification
Here is the result. eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped
Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree?
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, Definitely.
I can't tell you off hand what system its compiler for but most likely AIX or PowerPC.
Tkae Care
Thanks for your help !!!!! I'll give Esker the information !!!
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
maybe just retry after invoking that command ? chmod +x eula
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:56 +0100, Vincent Knecht wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
maybe just retry after invoking that command ? chmod +x eula
Thanks for the suggestion. I probably should have posted the deails. I was actually hoping that the protections was the issue but looks to me that it is not
Greg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:56 +0100, Vincent Knecht wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
maybe just retry after invoking that command ? chmod +x eula
Thanks for the suggestion. I probably should have posted the deails. I was actually hoping that the protections was the issue but looks to me that it is not
Have you looked at HylaFax, an open source fax system for *nix systems that has been around for many years (it started life as flexfax, but had to change the name since somebody else had it). We have been using HylaFax on various Linux systems for well over a decade with excellent results (and we hosted their mailing list for several years before they registered hylafax.org).
Another commercial package for *nix systems is Faximum. This too has been around since the early '90s.
Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
The pinnacle of open systems is: when moving from vendor to vendor, the design flaws stay the same.
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:25 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:56 +0100, Vincent Knecht wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
maybe just retry after invoking that command ? chmod +x eula
Thanks for the suggestion. I probably should have posted the deails. I was actually hoping that the protections was the issue but looks to me that it is not
Have you looked at HylaFax, an open source fax system for *nix systems that has been around for many years (it started life as flexfax, but had to change the name since somebody else had it). We have been using HylaFax on various Linux systems for well over a decade with excellent results (and we hosted their mailing list for several years before they registered hylafax.org).
Another commercial package for *nix systems is Faximum. This too has been around since the early '90s.
Bill
INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
The pinnacle of open systems is: when moving from vendor to vendor, the design flaws stay the same.
Bill,
Thanks for taking the time to suggest hylafax. We need to be able to convert *.pcl files to tiff files either at the time of faxing or the fax module needs to do this for us. Does hylafax have the capability to convert pcl to tif? vsifax has done what we needed, but to my surprise the more I talk with them the more I get the impression they are not actively wanting to support it for Unix/Linux systems.
I'll take a look at both hylafax and faximum.... thanks for the leads
Greg
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:48:04 -0600 "Gregory P. Ennis" PoMec@PoMec.Net wrote:
We need to be able to convert *.pcl files to tiff files either at the time of faxing or the fax module needs to do this for us.
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:25 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:56 +0100, Vincent Knecht wrote:
All....
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
maybe just retry after invoking that command ? chmod +x eula
Thanks for the suggestion. I probably should have posted the deails. I was actually hoping that the protections was the issue but looks to me that it is not
Have you looked at HylaFax, an open source fax system for *nix systems that has been around for many years (it started life as flexfax, but had to change the name since somebody else had it). We have been using HylaFax on various Linux systems for well over a decade with excellent results (and we hosted their mailing list for several years before they registered hylafax.org).
Another commercial package for *nix systems is Faximum. This too has been around since the early '90s.
...
Bill,
Thanks for taking the time to suggest hylafax. We need to be able to convert *.pcl files to tiff files either at the time of faxing or the fax module needs to do this for us. Does hylafax have the capability to convert pcl to tif? vsifax has done what we needed, but to my surprise the more I talk with them the more I get the impression they are not actively wanting to support it for Unix/Linux systems.
Personally I haven't had any need for PCL->FAX translation, but somebody else suggested ImageMagick which has lots of conversion options as does ghostscript.
I often send faxes from HylaFAX with PDF documents. It handles PostScript, plain-text, and a variety of image formats as well.
Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. (Joseph Stalin)
-
Bill Campbell -
Clint Dilks -
Frank Cox -
Gregory P. Ennis -
Liam Kirsher -
Vincent Knecht