has anyone come across a wine 1.1.10 RPM? Searching all the usual places.....
d
dnk wrote:
has anyone come across a wine 1.1.10 RPM? Searching all the usual places.....
Even Fedora 10 updates is only at 1.1.9 - seems unlikely. One could try to build the rawhide version:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/...
By the time you satisfied all the dependencies I expect you'd have something closer to rawhide than CentOS.
Phil
yehaw???
Compile it is then!
d
On 11-Dec-08, at 10:53 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
By the time you satisfied all the dependencies I expect you'd have something closer to rawhide than CentOS.
Well, you cannot have both - Country *and* Western.
Ralph_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
dnk wrote:
yehaw???
Compile it is then!
d
On 11-Dec-08, at 10:53 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
By the time you satisfied all the dependencies I expect you'd have something closer to rawhide than CentOS.
Well, you cannot have both - Country *and* Western.
Please avoid top-posting per CentOS List Guidelines: http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16 - http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html - http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
Well maybe can't have Country and Hip Hop? The Country/Western genre is quite healthy. :-)
Anyway, this thread got my curiosity up and rawhide wine-1.1.10-1 is not all that hard to build on CentOS-5. Only took a couple of minor spec file changes (that could have been avoided by tweaks to the build environment or rpmbuild arguments), and the only core package I had to replace was autoconf - built from Fedora 7 2.61 sources. (Wine wanted 2.59d or greater and CentOS-5 has 2.59.) Other deps were available from EPEL and/or RPMforge EL5 repos.
Haven't installed and tested it yet as I didn't want to risk breaking my Crossover Office M$ apps. Will try it on a VMware testbed if I get a chance. Haven't got a public site to put the RPMs on, but I see from another branch of the thread that Dag is already on the job.
So, if CentOS is Country (RHEL is classical?) and Fedora is Hip Hop, only minor additions to the rhythm section were needed to achieve this fusion.
Phil
On 12-Dec-08, at 5:13 AM, Phil Schaffner Philip.R.Schaffner@NASA.gov wrote:
dnk wrote:
yehaw???
Compile it is then!
d
On 11-Dec-08, at 10:53 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
By the time you satisfied all the dependencies I expect you'd have something closer to rawhide than CentOS.
Well, you cannot have both - Country *and* Western.
Please avoid top-posting per CentOS List Guidelines: http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
Well maybe can't have Country and Hip Hop? The Country/Western genre is quite healthy. :-)
Anyway, this thread got my curiosity up and rawhide wine-1.1.10-1 is not all that hard to build on CentOS-5. Only took a couple of minor spec file changes (that could have been avoided by tweaks to the build environment or rpmbuild arguments), and the only core package I had to replace was autoconf - built from Fedora 7 2.61 sources. (Wine wanted 2.59d or greater and CentOS-5 has 2.59.) Other deps were available from EPEL and/or RPMforge EL5 repos.
Haven't installed and tested it yet as I didn't want to risk breaking my Crossover Office M$ apps. Will try it on a VMware testbed if I get a chance. Haven't got a public site to put the RPMs on, but I see from another branch of the thread that Dag is already on the job.
So, if CentOS is Country (RHEL is classical?) and Fedora is Hip Hop, only minor additions to the rhythm section were needed to achieve this fusion.
Phil _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Sorry, sent it from my phone.
D
dnk wrote:
has anyone come across a wine 1.1.10 RPM? Searching all the usual places.....
How would you expect something WineHQ describes as a "development release" only out a few days to have as you call it "a rpm for CentOS available"?
What's new in this version of wine? Do IE, Media player work out of the box?
Regards, Vandaman.
Well it is not that I expected it to be done. I was just curious as in my searches I found some for openSuse, etc and "hoped" that maybe someone had rolled some.
The main reason I need it, is that I have a particular Windows program that causes seg faults in the older wine version, but not in 1.1.10. I was just hoping to streamline subsequent installs... =-)
d
On 11-Dec-08, at 11:57 AM, Vandaman wrote:
dnk wrote:
has anyone come across a wine 1.1.10 RPM? Searching all the usual places.....
How would you expect something WineHQ describes as a "development release" only out a few days to have as you call it "a rpm for CentOS available"?
What's new in this version of wine? Do IE, Media player work out of the box?
Regards, Vandaman.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 12-11-2008 12:41 PM dnk spake the following:
Well it is not that I expected it to be done. I was just curious as in my searches I found some for openSuse, etc and "hoped" that maybe someone had rolled some.
The main reason I need it, is that I have a particular Windows program that causes seg faults in the older wine version, but not in 1.1.10. I was just hoping to streamline subsequent installs... =-)
OpenSUSE is more akin to Fedora. They experiment more with shiny new things. You can always run virtual machines for real picky programs.
dnk wrote:
Well it is not that I expected it to be done. I was just curious as in my searches I found some for openSuse, etc and "hoped" that maybe someone had rolled some.
at one point in the past WinHQ's release process included rpms for EL4/EL5 - is that no longer the case ? If not, perhaps they could do with a hand in the release process itself ( which might be a good way for you to get involved perhaps ? )
Would you be able to investigate this a bit further ?
on 12-11-2008 2:26 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
dnk wrote:
Well it is not that I expected it to be done. I was just curious as in my searches I found some for openSuse, etc and "hoped" that maybe someone had rolled some.
at one point in the past WineHQ's release process included rpms for EL4/EL5 - is that no longer the case ? If not, perhaps they could do with a hand in the release process itself ( which might be a good way for you to get involved perhaps ? )
Would you be able to investigate this a bit further ?
If they have released it yet, it would be in EPEL.
They are still making RPM's, it is just that this one is "bleeding" edge, and not considered stable as of yet.
It will come down the pipeline at some point.
d
On 11-Dec-08, at 2:26 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
dnk wrote:
Well it is not that I expected it to be done. I was just curious as in my searches I found some for openSuse, etc and "hoped" that maybe someone had rolled some.
at one point in the past WinHQ's release process included rpms for EL4/EL5 - is that no longer the case ? If not, perhaps they could do with a hand in the release process itself ( which might be a good way for you to get involved perhaps ? )
Would you be able to investigate this a bit further ?
-- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos@irc.freenode.net _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, dnk wrote:
On 11-Dec-08, at 2:26 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
dnk wrote:
Well it is not that I expected it to be done. I was just curious as in my searches I found some for openSuse, etc and "hoped" that maybe someone had rolled some.
at one point in the past WinHQ's release process included rpms for EL4/EL5 - is that no longer the case ? If not, perhaps they could do with a hand in the release process itself ( which might be a good way for you to get involved perhaps ? )
Would you be able to investigate this a bit further ?
They are still making RPM's, it is just that this one is "bleeding" edge, and not considered stable as of yet.
It will come down the pipeline at some point.
RPMforge provides stable wine (1.0) packages in the normal repositories. And we also provide test packages (1.1) from the test repositories.
In this case I only have 1.1.9 releases available from the test repository because Wine does not announce new unstable releases on freshmeat. So there is no practical way to monitor new releases. (We have more than 4000 packages, we cannot monitor individual mailinglists)
(In fact the latest stable release on freshmeat is 1.0, and not 1.0.1 :-/)
I am a firm believer to let upstream decide what is stable and is unstable because they know much better. I often advice people asking me to make available an unstable release in RPMforge to discuss with upstream to see whether they can stabilize their unstable tree.
That said, I am building 1.1.10 packages right now but they will only become available on saturday since I will miss the deadline for tomorrow. Wine packages take a long time to build (often need 2 passes).
Well that is great. On a selfish level, it will make certain things easier over here! :-)
Dnk
Sent from my iPhone
On 11-Dec-08, at 4:33 PM, Dag Wieers dag@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, dnk wrote:
On 11-Dec-08, at 2:26 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
dnk wrote:
Well it is not that I expected it to be done. I was just curious as in my searches I found some for openSuse, etc and "hoped" that maybe someone had rolled some.
at one point in the past WinHQ's release process included rpms for EL4/EL5 - is that no longer the case ? If not, perhaps they could do with a hand in the release process itself ( which might be a good way for you to get involved perhaps ? )
Would you be able to investigate this a bit further ?
They are still making RPM's, it is just that this one is "bleeding" edge, and not considered stable as of yet.
It will come down the pipeline at some point.
RPMforge provides stable wine (1.0) packages in the normal repositories. And we also provide test packages (1.1) from the test repositories.
In this case I only have 1.1.9 releases available from the test repository because Wine does not announce new unstable releases on freshmeat. So there is no practical way to monitor new releases. (We have more than 4000 packages, we cannot monitor individual mailinglists)
(In fact the latest stable release on freshmeat is 1.0, and not 1.0.1 :-/)
I am a firm believer to let upstream decide what is stable and is unstable because they know much better. I often advice people asking me to make available an unstable release in RPMforge to discuss with upstream to see whether they can stabilize their unstable tree.
That said, I am building 1.1.10 packages right now but they will only become available on saturday since I will miss the deadline for tomorrow. Wine packages take a long time to build (often need 2 passes).
-- -- dag wieers, dag@centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dnk wrote:
Well that is great. On a selfish level, it will make certain things easier over here! :-)
please dont top-post and make an effort to trim your posts.
On 12-Dec-08, at 6:41 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Dnk wrote:
Well that is great. On a selfish level, it will make certain things easier over here! :-)
please dont top-post and make an effort to trim your posts.
Dually noted. :-)
Deleting a ton of text from a phone. Blah! Haha. But understandable.
Appologies.
D
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Dnk wrote:
Well that is great. On a selfish level, it will make certain things easier over here! :-)
or
http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/i386/test/RPMS/
On 14-Dec-08, at 4:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Dnk wrote:
Well that is great. On a selfish level, it will make certain things easier over here! :-)
or
http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/i386/test/RPMS/
-- -- dag wieers, dag@centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
Thanks Dag!
MUCH appreciated.
Dustin
Karanbir Singh wrote:
at one point in the past WinHQ's release process included rpms for EL4/EL5 - is that no longer the case ? If not, perhaps they could do with a hand in the release process itself ( which might be a good way for you to get involved perhaps ? )
Would you be able to investigate this a bit further ?
Wine's stable downloads for RHEL/CentOS/Fedora have always been at http://www.winehq.org/download/
Latest stable release: Wine 1.0.1 Latest development release: Wine 1.1.10
Before you could download rpms directly from that page, now you need EPEL repo and then do "yum install wine".
Regards, Vandaman.
-
Dag Wieers -
dnk -
Karanbir Singh -
Karanbir Singh -
Phil Schaffner -
Ralph Angenendt -
Scott Silva -
Vandaman