Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 - ACPI version : 20060707 ----------------------------------------------------------- Battery status : <error reading info>
Function Do_AC_Info_Sys: could not read directory /sys/class/power_supply/ Make sure your kernel has ACPI AC adapter support enabled. Fan : <not available>
CPU type : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5110 @ 1.60GHz CPU speed : 1595.980 MHz Cache size : 4096 KB Bogomips : 3193.92 Bogomips : 3191.86
# of CPU's found : 2
Processor ID : 0 Bus mastering control : no Power management : no Throttling control : yes Limit interface : yes Active C-state : C1 C-states (incl. C0) : 1 T-state count : 8 Active T-state : T0
Processor ID : 1 Bus mastering control : no Power management : no Throttling control : yes Limit interface : yes Active C-state : C1 C-states (incl. C0) : 1 T-state count : 8 Active T-state : T0
Thermal info : <not available>
Device Sleep state Status --------------------------------------- 1. PCI0 5 disabled
And:
grep THERMAL /boot/config-2.6.18-92.el5 CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance!
----- "Sergio Belkin" sebelk@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
<...>
Am I doing something wrong?
You'll want to check out lm_sensors. Not sure off the top of my head if its in the normal repos or if you have to grab it from RPMforge...
Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105
thus Tim Nelson spake:
----- "Sergio Belkin" sebelk@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
<...>
Am I doing something wrong?
You'll want to check out lm_sensors. Not sure off the top of my head if its in the normal repos or if you have to grab it from RPMforge...
It's in base. :)
Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 - ACPI version : 20060707
That doesn't look like a CentOS kernel.
Battery status : <error reading info>
Function Do_AC_Info_Sys: could not read directory /sys/class/power_supply/ Make sure your kernel has ACPI AC adapter support enabled. Fan : <not available>
CPU type : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5110 @ 1.60GHz CPU speed : 1595.980 MHz Cache size : 4096 KB Bogomips : 3193.92 Bogomips : 3191.86
# of CPU's found : 2
Processor ID : 0 Bus mastering control : no Power management : no Throttling control : yes Limit interface : yes Active C-state : C1 C-states (incl. C0) : 1 T-state count : 8 Active T-state : T0
Processor ID : 1 Bus mastering control : no Power management : no Throttling control : yes Limit interface : yes Active C-state : C1 C-states (incl. C0) : 1 T-state count : 8 Active T-state : T0
Thermal info : <not available>
Device Sleep state Status
- PCI0 5 disabled
And:
grep THERMAL /boot/config-2.6.18-92.el5 CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Not sure what acpi thermal info might be returned by your system (try looking in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone), but as it's an Intel Core based processor, coretemp should return basic CPU core temperatures.
You can install the coretemp module from elrepo.org (kmod-coretemp) which should also pull in an updated lm_sensors as a dependency from the same repository. BTW, it will only work with kernels that are kABI compliant with the upstream EL5 kernel (i.e, the CentOS 5 kernel) - no guarantees it will work if you're running a custom kernel, you'd need to recompile the package against your custom kernel.
2009/9/18 Ned Slider ned@unixmail.co.uk:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 - ACPI version : 20060707
Why are you asumming so quickly that is not a Centos kernel?
rpm -qi kernel Name : kernel Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.6.18 Vendor: CentOS Release : 92.el5 Build Date: Tue 10 Jun 2008 10:09:15 PM ART Install Date: Thu 27 Nov 2008 04:51:05 PM ARST Build Host: builder16.centos.org Group : System Environment/Kernel Source RPM: kernel-2.6.18-92.el5.src.rpm Size : 39056061 License: GPLv2 Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sat 14 Jun 2008 08:35:41 PM ART, Key ID a8a447dce8562897 URL : http://www.kernel.org/ Summary : The Linux kernel (the core of the Linux operating system) Description : The kernel package contains the Linux kernel (vmlinuz), the core of any Linux operating system. The kernel handles the basic functions of the operating system: memory allocation, process allocation, device input and output, etc.
What's wrong with you?
Sergio Belkin wrote:
2009/9/18 Ned Slider ned@unixmail.co.uk:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 - ACPI version : 20060707
Why are you asumming so quickly that is not a Centos kernel?
Because this is what the output from 'acpitool -e' looks like for me:
$ acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-164.el5 - ACPI version : 20060707
and your output shows 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 which is not a CentOS kernel format (to my knowledge?). I might be wrong, and am happy to be corrected if I am :)
rpm -qi kernel Name : kernel Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.6.18 Vendor: CentOS Release : 92.el5 Build Date: Tue 10 Jun
Which is not the kernel you've shown running above??
What's wrong with you?
Nothing, I was trying to help.
Have a nice weekend.
2009/9/18 Ned Slider ned@unixmail.co.uk:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
2009/9/18 Ned Slider ned@unixmail.co.uk:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 - ACPI version : 20060707
Why are you asumming so quickly that is not a Centos kernel?
Because this is what the output from 'acpitool -e' looks like for me:
$ acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-164.el5 - ACPI version : 20060707
and your output shows 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 which is not a CentOS kernel format (to my knowledge?). I might be wrong, and am happy to be corrected if I am :)
Yes you're wrong :)
acpitool output it's not the same that uname -r. I mean it doesn't show rpm package name.
rpm -qi kernel Name : kernel Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.6.18 Vendor: CentOS Release : 92.el5 Build Date: Tue 10 Jun
Which is not the kernel you've shown running above??
Well, I explained it above. Sorry for my terrible sin, It is not Centos 5.3 but 5.2.
Links Kernel used is below:
http://vault.centos.org/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/kernel-2.6.18-92.el5.x86_64.rpm
What's wrong with you?
Nothing, I was trying to help.
Have a nice weekend.
Sorry for I was rude Ned, but I am somewhat sick of answers of people that don't want to help about anything and only know to give moral advices and ask "are you really using a system of every package Centos that has been blessed?". Hey, of course I ask here because I use CentOS at work, and because supposedly there are people that has experience using ir on daily basis.
Have a nice day
Sergio Belkin wrote:
2009/9/18 Ned Slider ned@unixmail.co.uk:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
2009/9/18 Ned Slider ned@unixmail.co.uk:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 - ACPI version : 20060707
Why are you asumming so quickly that is not a Centos kernel?
Because this is what the output from 'acpitool -e' looks like for me:
$ acpitool -e Kernel version : 2.6.18-164.el5 - ACPI version : 20060707
and your output shows 2.6.18-92.1.18.20060707 which is not a CentOS kernel format (to my knowledge?). I might be wrong, and am happy to be corrected if I am :)
Yes you're wrong :)
acpitool output it's not the same that uname -r. I mean it doesn't show rpm package name.
rpm -qi kernel Name : kernel Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.6.18 Vendor: CentOS Release : 92.el5 Build Date: Tue 10 Jun
Which is not the kernel you've shown running above??
Well, I explained it above. Sorry for my terrible sin, It is not Centos 5.3 but 5.2.
Links Kernel used is below:
http://vault.centos.org/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/kernel-2.6.18-92.el5.x86_64.rpm
What's wrong with you?
Nothing, I was trying to help.
Have a nice weekend.
Sorry for I was rude Ned, but I am somewhat sick of answers of people that don't want to help about anything and only know to give moral advices and ask "are you really using a system of every package Centos that has been blessed?". Hey, of course I ask here because I use CentOS at work, and because supposedly there are people that has experience using ir on daily basis.
Have a nice day
No problem :)
As it's a CentOS kernel, then the elrepo.org coretemp module will work just fine and will give you nice accurate thermal data for the cpu.
As it's a CentOS kernel, then the elrepo.org coretemp module will work just fine and will give you nice accurate thermal data for the cpu.
Does anyone know where I can find the kernel source for coretemp which does *not* depend on Xen and a PAE kernel, i.e,. other than the source RPMs from elerepo.org? I'm running a 2.6.18-128.1.10 kernel on a netbook (Intel Atom N270.)
Agile Aspect wrote:
As it's a CentOS kernel, then the elrepo.org coretemp module will work just fine and will give you nice accurate thermal data for the cpu.
Does anyone know where I can find the kernel source for coretemp which does *not* depend on Xen and a PAE kernel, i.e,. other than the source RPMs from elerepo.org? I'm running a 2.6.18-128.1.10 kernel on a netbook (Intel Atom N270.)
Not sure I understand your question. The SRPM from ELRepo.org does not depend on xen or PAE kernels, but it does require xen and PAE kernel-devel packages installed *if* you build it for those variants. Equally you can just build it against a base kernel (non-xen/PAE) with the command line option --define 'kvariants ""'.
Alternatively, if you don't like the elrepo SRPM feel free to grab the source code directly from the latest upstream kernel (http://kernel.org) and backport the code for yourself.
Does coretemp support Intel Atom processors?
-
Agile Aspect -
Ned Slider -
Sergio Belkin -
Tim Nelson -
Timo Schoeler