Hi,
I've got a box with CentOS 4.2 x86_64 which had no DHCP access for a few hours, now I can't ping it (I'm pretty sure the box is still up). I expect the DHCP lease has timed out and the box has lost it's IP, I was expecting it to reacquire it once the DHCP came back up (configuration problem) - but no luck. Is this a known problem? Any solution/workaround? (for now or for the future...)
Cheers, MaZe.
Maciej. No answer to your loss of DHCP. Haven't even found the DHCP setup. How did you set it up? Gui? Cli? I have CentOS 2.1, but imagine the same setup. Have tried wired and wireless and have had no connection. Tony
On 1/17/06, Maciej Żenczykowski maze@cela.pl wrote:
Hi,
I've got a box with CentOS 4.2 x86_64 which had no DHCP access for a few hours, now I can't ping it (I'm pretty sure the box is still up). I expect the DHCP lease has timed out and the box has lost it's IP, I was expecting it to reacquire it once the DHCP came back up (configuration problem) - but no luck. Is this a known problem? Any solution/workaround? (for now or for the future...)
Cheers, MaZe. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Actually the DHCP client on the box was setup during installation (pretty much the default there). As for the server, that was done by installing and enabling the server (via "yum install dhcpd" and "chkconfig ... dhcpd on" and "/etc/init.d/dhcpd restart") with a hand edited /etc/dhcpd.conf configuration file.
Basically the problem was that I unloaded the kernel module responsible for the network interface on the DHCP server and then loaded a different once and forgot to restart applicable services (DHCP) that bind direct to devices - thus leading to no DHCP on the reloaded network interface for a little over quarter of a day (until I restarted the DHCP server). Obviously the server issue was an oops on my part, but the question is why doesn't the client recover gracefully....
Cheers, MaZe.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Anthony Lordi wrote:
Maciej. No answer to your loss of DHCP. Haven't even found the DHCP setup.
How did you set it up? Gui? Cli? I have CentOS 2.1, but imagine the same setup. Have tried wired and wireless and have had no connection. Tony
On 1/17/06, Maciej Żenczykowski maze@cela.pl wrote:
Hi,
I've got a box with CentOS 4.2 x86_64 which had no DHCP access for a few hours, now I can't ping it (I'm pretty sure the box is still up). I expect the DHCP lease has timed out and the box has lost it's IP, I was expecting it to reacquire it once the DHCP came back up (configuration problem) - but no luck. Is this a known problem? Any solution/workaround? (for now or for the future...)
Cheers, MaZe. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 1/17/06, Maciej Żenczykowski maze@cela.pl wrote:
Actually the DHCP client on the box was setup during installation (pretty much the default there). As for the server, that was done by installing and enabling the server (via "yum install dhcpd" and "chkconfig ... dhcpd on" and "/etc/init.d/dhcpd restart") with a hand edited /etc/dhcpd.conf configuration file.
Basically the problem was that I unloaded the kernel module responsible for the network interface on the DHCP server and then loaded a different once and forgot to restart applicable services (DHCP) that bind direct to devices - thus leading to no DHCP on the reloaded network interface for a little over quarter of a day (until I restarted the DHCP server). Obviously the server issue was an oops on my part, but the question is why doesn't the client recover gracefully....
It does if you have a 'retry' value assigned in /etc/dhclient.conf, however this file doesn't exist by default. I'm not sure what it does without this file, but I'd gather from your experience, it's nothing good.
-- Jim Perrin System Architect - UIT Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center
It does if you have a 'retry' value assigned in /etc/dhclient.conf, however this file doesn't exist by default. I'm not sure what it does without this file, but I'd gather from your experience, it's nothing good.
I've read through dhclient.conf and I haven't found anything which would appear to govern what I think is happening - 'retry' value included. But maybe my interpretation is incorrect.
Here's what happened again:
a) client boot b) get DHCP - success c) a lot of time (days) passes with DHCP renews d) --- DHCP server is broken --- e) DHCP renewals fail (?) f) DHCP lease times out (?) g) IP address is deconfigured (?) h) --- DHCP server is repaired --- i) nothing happens... while I would expect: i) after sometime the 'n'th periodic DHCP retry finally reacquires an IP address...
[the retry statement has a default of 5 min, and even 24 hours haven't helped...]
Cheers, MaZe.
Anyone running on Sun gear? Wondering how the performance has been from your experiences and if there have been any issues.
Andrew
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 01:35 pm, Andrew Cotter wrote:
Anyone running on Sun gear? Wondering how the performance has been from your experiences and if there have been any issues.
I doubt you'll get any reasonable response; since you posted to the "DHCP without network access" thread the best you'll probably do is a response or two about SUN and DHCP. And the worst? A few more requests to not hijack threads.
Jeff
Andrew Cotter wrote:
Anyone running on Sun gear? Wondering how the performance has been from your experiences and if there have been any issues.
Are you talking x86 or sparc? On the x86 boxes, it should be a rather uneventful install. Not sure about the current batch of sparcs though...
Cheers,
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Andrew Cotter wrote:
Anyone running on Sun gear? Wondering how the performance has been from your experiences and if there have been any issues.
Are you talking x86 or sparc? On the x86 boxes, it should be a rather uneventful install. Not sure about the current batch of sparcs though...
Cheers,
Not on their x86. More along the lines of 280R/V440/V880 systems. Just curious since my company has a number of these systems around.
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 15:52, Andrew Cotter wrote:
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Andrew Cotter wrote:
Anyone running on Sun gear? Wondering how the performance has been from your experiences and if there have been any issues.
Are you talking x86 or sparc? On the x86 boxes, it should be a rather uneventful install. Not sure about the current batch of sparcs though...
Cheers,
Not on their x86. More along the lines of 280R/V440/V880 systems. Just curious since my company has a number of these systems around.
If they would be willing to donate id take one or two of them. Im currently running Aurora Linux on a Ultra 2, E3000, sun blade 100 and a marathon clone 2u rack mount server. Im using aurora linux on mine they work pretty well.
Dennis
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 13:46 +0900, centos wrote:
Where can I find GFS refer?? Except centos.org
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/docs/
or
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 15:33, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
Actually the DHCP client on the box was setup during installation (pretty much the default there). As for the server, that was done by installing and enabling the server (via "yum install dhcpd" and "chkconfig ... dhcpd on" and "/etc/init.d/dhcpd restart") with a hand edited /etc/dhcpd.conf configuration file.
Basically the problem was that I unloaded the kernel module responsible for the network interface on the DHCP server and then loaded a different once and forgot to restart applicable services (DHCP) that bind direct to devices - thus leading to no DHCP on the reloaded network interface for a little over quarter of a day (until I restarted the DHCP server). Obviously the server issue was an oops on my part, but the question is why doesn't the client recover gracefully....
Maybe it did but has a different IP address now? Or did you lock IP address assigned to the MAC address?
Maybe it did but has a different IP address now? Or did you lock IP address assigned to the MAC address?
Nah, it's locked, and there's no incoming DHCP requests, besides I also scanned (arping) the entire 169.254.0.0/16 range and nothing there as well as far as I can tell. Well I'll see the machine physically tomorrow so we'll see then what it's actually doing...
Cheers, MaZe.