Hello,
I have a number centos3.8 installations. Recently I have figured out that version of coreutils is :
[ivan@algol ivan]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-4.5.3-28.1
while RedHat has released an bux fix errata to that package:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0670.html
Actually I discovered that when I encounter bug that should be fixed by this update: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200327
Why this package is not included in recent centos3 updates?
Thank you, Ivan
Ivan Pesin spake the following on 11/8/2006 10:53 AM:
Hello,
I have a number centos3.8 installations. Recently I have figured out that version of coreutils is :
[ivan@algol ivan]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-4.5.3-28.1
while RedHat has released an bux fix errata to that package:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0670.html
Actually I discovered that when I encounter bug that should be fixed by this update: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200327
Why this package is not included in recent centos3 updates?
Thank you, Ivan
It is in the fasttrack repo. Since it is a non-security related bugfix, it wouldn't go out until the next subversion is released. You can either get it directly, or add the fasttrack repo to yum. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/Readme.txt
Scott Silva said the following on 11/08/2006 09:24 PM:
It is in the fasttrack repo. Since it is a non-security related bugfix, it wouldn't go out until the next subversion is released. You can either get it directly, or add the fasttrack repo to yum. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/Readme.txt
Thank you for info!
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Ivan Pesin wrote:
while RedHat has released an bux fix errata to that package:
hmmm; it is a bug fix, and not a security matter, from a review of the URL contents; it is possible that it was overlooked, or that the SRPM was not mentioned in an announcement such that it did not trigger itself into the awareness of the update maintainance group.
-- Russ Herrold