Sorin Srbu wrote:
Why don't you get your proprietary drivers from nvidia.com? Or do you need an actual rpm-package? Anyway, you're bound to get newest stuff from Nvidia.com.
Yes, using an rpm package is better, as the packaged drivers do not remove libGL.so, for example, like the nvidia driver does.
Cheers,
Ralph
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
Ralph Angenendt Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:13 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] where did all the nonfree rpms go? Nvidia?
xine-lib-mp3?
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Why don't you get your proprietary drivers from nvidia.com? Or do you need
an
actual rpm-package? Anyway, you're bound to get newest stuff from
Nvidia.com.
Yes, using an rpm package is better, as the packaged drivers do not remove libGL.so, for example, like the nvidia driver does.
You need those for a particular reason? Backward-compatibility maybe? Just curious.
/Sorin
-
Ralph Angenendt -
Sorin Srbu