Hi
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:41 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrors and Adjacent country groups
On 8/25/09, Rainer Duffner rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Am 26.08.2009 um 00:13 schrieb Lanny Marcus:
<snip>
Don't you have peering-points somewhere? Sorry for hijacking this thread...
Rainer: I don't think your reply is OT or hijacking. Good point. I suspect that in the EU, there is a lot of peering between countries, but here in SA, I don't think so.
I suspected that. To illustrate, this: http://www.caida.org/research/topology/as_core_network/pics/ascore-ipv 4-ipv6.200903_poster.pdf is the map I was looking for.
Cool. I downloaded that 4.3 MB file. I suspect we could peer with Panama. I believe like Colombia, they are also quite advanced with regard to telecommunications, and it's close. The city I live in (Cali) is actually much closer to Miami, Florida than Los Angeles, California is. And maybe we could peer with Peru, but that's a long way to our South.
----
Afaik it is impossible to deduce from the URL if one node is located nearby or far away. Eventhough as i live in europe, i can register and use a japanese URL.
Secondly, i fond out that ISP do funny tricks with routing: My connection to my next-door-neighbour goes via a transcient node in New-York (high latency).
Only traceroute can give you a clue if a node is local or not. And even then there is a question of available bandwith....
Hans
______________________________________________________________________ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
J.Witvliet@MINDEF.NL schrieb:
Afaik it is impossible to deduce from the URL if one node is located nearby or far away.
Yeah. That was really just an illustration.
Eventhough as i live in europe, i can register and use a japanese URL.
Secondly, i fond out that ISP do funny tricks with routing: My connection to my next-door-neighbour goes via a transcient node in New-York (high latency).
Only traceroute can give you a clue if a node is local or not.
Yes, that and may some BPG looking-glass. I'm not a routing expert, but AFAIK, you do peering mostly at peering-locations ("meeting-rooms", internet-exchanges). At least, that's what we do here in Europe. You have a fast leased line to such a peering-location and then you can "peer" with everybody you like and have a low hop-count to that ISP.
And even then there is a question of available bandwith....
Well, peering should improve bandwidth and latency. Because local bandwidth should be cheaper to get than international bandwidth.
Rainer
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:39 AM, J.Witvliet@mindef.nl wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:41 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrors and Adjacent country groups
<snip>
Afaik it is impossible to deduce from the URL if one node is located nearby or far away. Eventhough as i live in europe, i can register and use a japanese URL.
Secondly, i fond out that ISP do funny tricks with routing: My connection to my next-door-neighbour goes via a transcient node in New-York (high latency).
To your next door neighbor? Terrible!
Only traceroute can give you a clue if a node is local or not. And even then there is a question of available bandwith....
Agreed