I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is:
"Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when upstream has released it for all the versions?"
The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other updates (on Oct. 9).
Are the "enhancements"... "not important" as long as they're not "security updates"?
True, the guys from SL have only released tzdata-2007h in "fastbugs" -- which is something you should not use --, but I am asking in a single place: why?
Thanks, R-C
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is:
"Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when upstream has released it for all the versions?"
It has been released to CentOS-3 on Oct 7th, in the updates repository. The other maintainers have their own schedule/priorities.
<offensive mode> Making CentOS a reality is not our daily job/duty, remember? </offensive>
The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other updates (on Oct. 9).
<troll mod activated> No one prevents you for switching distribution. </troll>
Are the "enhancements"... "not important" as long as they're not "security updates"?
Speaking for CentOS-3, the enhancements used to go to the fasttrack repo, ie pending updates for the next point release. Since CentOS-3.9 is the last respin, all the RHEA are now in updates.
True, the guys from SL have only released tzdata-2007h in "fastbugs" -- which is something you should not use --, but I am asking in a single place: why?
Ask on the SL mailing list, we can't speak for them!
Tru
Mea culpa, I can see now that tzdata-2007h was released for CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 too, on Oct. 6... it's just I didn't see the corresponding e-mails!
Sorry about that.
Thanks, R-C
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is:
"Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when upstream has released it for all the versions?"
The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other updates (on Oct. 9).
Are the "enhancements"... "not important" as long as they're not "security updates"?
True, the guys from SL have only released tzdata-2007h in "fastbugs" -- which is something you should not use --, but I am asking in a single place: why?
Ummm. This is from my CentOS 5 /var/log/yum.log: Oct 06 14:30:09 Updated: tzdata.noarch 2007h-1.el5
Your post made me curious about its origin.
[rj@mavis ~]$ rpm -qi tzdata Name : tzdata Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2007h Vendor: CentOS Release : 1.el5 Build Date: Sat 06 Oct 2007 07:59:45 AM CDT Install Date: Sat 06 Oct 2007 02:30:01 PM CDT Build Host: builder6 Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: tzdata-2007h-1.el5.src.rpm Size : 1784261 License: GPL Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sat 06 Oct 2007 08:03:16 AM CDT, Key ID a8a447dce8562897 Summary : Timezone data Description : This package contains data files with rules for various timezones around the world.
Thanks, R-C
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--- Robert kerplop@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Ummm. This is from my CentOS 5 /var/log/yum.log: Oct 06 14:30:09 Updated: tzdata.noarch 2007h-1.el5
Sorry, my bad. I trusted *too much* the mails from centos-announce, and the only tzdata-2007h e-mail announcement was for CentOS 2!
R-C
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca