Sorin Srbu wrote:
Checked the site ou linked too, but I don't get it. Would my pics be hosted on my own server or on jalbum.net á la Picasa? I can't tell from the tour on the jalbum web site.
you run jalbum on the workstation that you use to process your photos (could even be a mac or windows desktop, it really doesn't matter), and it creates all the scaled images and thumbnails and html pages, and uploads them to your webserver. the overhead mentioned by others only happens *once* when you initially process or add to the album. your webserver only has to handle plain html, no php or other scripting languags, no databases.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, John R Piercepierce@hogranch.com wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Checked the site ou linked too, but I don't get it. Would my pics be hosted on my own server or on jalbum.net á la Picasa? I can't tell from the tour on the jalbum web site.
you run jalbum on the workstation that you use to process your photos (could even be a mac or windows desktop, it really doesn't matter), and it creates all the scaled images and thumbnails and html pages, and uploads them to your webserver. the overhead mentioned by others only happens *once* when you initially process or add to the album. your webserver only has to handle plain html, no php or other scripting languags, no databases.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hm, maybe I should check jalbum again; what I said is from last year's memories.. maybe they improved.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John R Pierce Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:02 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Checked the site ou linked too, but I don't get it. Would my pics be
hosted
on my own server or on jalbum.net á la Picasa? I can't tell from the tour
on
the jalbum web site.
you run jalbum on the workstation that you use to process your photos (could even be a mac or windows desktop, it really doesn't matter), and it creates all the scaled images and thumbnails and html pages, and uploads them to your webserver. the overhead mentioned by others only happens *once* when you initially process or add to the album. your webserver only has to handle plain html, no php or other scripting languags, no databases.
Clear and to the point. Thanks. I might look into this as soon as time permits, which is a bit scarce at the moment. 8-/
-
John R Pierce -
Lucian＠lastdot.org -
Sorin Srbu