Apparently not. On a command line, type:
date '+%G'
First Spamassassin's bug (now fixed, type "sa-update" as user root), and now this...
******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** *******************************************************************************
2010/1/2 Gilbert Sebenste sebenste@weather.admin.niu.edu:
Apparently not. On a command line, type: date '+%G'
Looks perfectly correct to me - from man strftime
%G is replaced by a year as a decimal number with century. This year is the one that contains the greater part of the week (Monday as the first day of the week).
Maybe you want %Y?
%Y is replaced by the year with century as a decimal number.
Ben
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
2010/1/2 Gilbert Sebenste sebenste@weather.admin.niu.edu:
Apparently not. On a command line, type: date '+%G'
Looks perfectly correct to me - from man strftime
%G is replaced by a year as a decimal number with century. This year is the one that contains the greater part of the week (Monday as the first day of the week).Maybe you want %Y?
%Y is replaced by the year with century as a decimal number.Ben
Ahhhh, that explains it. You are correct! Never mind. Thanks for the pointer!
******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** *******************************************************************************
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:44:38PM -0600, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Apparently not. On a command line, type:
date '+%G'
This is, I believe, correct. We're in ISO week 53 of year 2009
% date +"%V %G -- %c" 53 2009 -- Sat Jan 2 18:29:48 2010
% date +"%V %G -- %c" -d "today + 1 day" 53 2009 -- Sun Jan 3 18:29:59 2010
% date +"%V %G -- %c" -d "today + 2 days" 01 2010 -- Mon Jan 4 18:30:06 2010
-
Benjamin Donnachie -
Gilbert Sebenste -
Stephen Harris